Skip to main content
Log in

Complementary Medicine Use and Self-perceived Discrimination Among Asylum Seekers in Switzerland: A Cross-sectional Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scarce data exist on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by asylum seekers in Switzerland and their perception of discrimination. A cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence and type of CAM used by asylum seekers in one region of Switzerland and evaluated their self-perceived discrimination. Among the 61 asylum seekers who participated, lifetime prevalence of CAM use was 46%, with 28% reporting its use during the last year. Herbal medicine was the most frequently used CAM. Self-perceived discrimination was reported by 36% of asylum seekers, mainly related to their national origins. CAM users had a tendency to report more discrimination than non-users (44% vs. 30%). CAM use is prevalent among asylum seekers. Considering the importance of herbal medicine use and that only half of the respondents disclosed CAM use to their physician, clinicians should ask about it, notably because of potential risks of herb–drug interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacDuff S, Grodin MA, Gardiner P. The use of complementary and alternative medicine among refugees: a systematic review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2011;13(3):585–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shippee TP, Schafer MH, Ferraro KF. Beyond the barriers: racial discrimination and use of complementary and alternative medicine among Black Americans. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(8):1155–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC, Mickelson KD, Williams DR. The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40:208–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchwald D, Panwala S, Hooton TM. Use of traditional health practices by Southeast Asian refugees in a primary care clinic. West J Med. 1992;156(5):507–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Klein SD, et al. Usage of complementary medicine in Switzerland: results of the Swiss Health Survey 2012 and development since 2007. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0141985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foley H, et al. Disclosure of complementary medicine use to medical providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadley C, Patil C. Perceived discrimination among three groups of refugees resettled in the USA: associations with language, time in the USA, and continent of origin. J Immigr Minor Health. 2009;11(6):505–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pascoe EA, Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(4):531–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Langlois EV, et al. Refugees: towards better access to health-care services. Lancet. 2016;387(10016):319–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaffee KD, Shires DA, Stroumsa D. Discrimination and delayed health care among transgender women and men: implications for improving medical education and health care delivery. Med Care. 2016;54(11):1010–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Muller M, et al. Understanding refugees’ health. Semin Neurol. 2018;38(2):152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gabriel P, Kaczorowski J, Berry N. Recruitment of refugees for health research: a qualitative study to add refugees’ perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all collaborators of the Etablissement vaudois d’accueil des migrants (EVAM) and of the Réseau de santé et migration (RESAMI), as well as the USMi (Unité de Soins aux Migrants) team. We wish also to thank Muaamar Al-Gobari, MPH, PhD, for performing statistical analyses; Julie Dubois, MA, for her careful reading of the manuscript; and all participating asylum seekers.

Funding

This study was internally funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Yves Rodondi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed Consent

Participants gave their oral consent before participating in this study.

Ethical Approval

The research ethics committee of the canton of Vaud approved the study (date of approval: 07/23/2015).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walthert, L., Bodenmann, P., Burnand, B. et al. Complementary Medicine Use and Self-perceived Discrimination Among Asylum Seekers in Switzerland: A Cross-sectional Study. J Immigrant Minority Health 22, 61–65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00895-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00895-5

Keywords

Navigation