Skip to main content
Log in

Immigrant Youth Have Significantly Lower Rates of Externalizing Behavior than Native-Born Americans: Differences by Region of Birth

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large proportion of Americans have the opinion that immigrants increase crime. Although past research has not found immigrant status to be associated with criminal behavior, American immigration policy has historically discriminated against certain groups based on their region of birth due to safety concerns. The purpose of the present study was to examine differences in externalizing behavior by immigrant’s region of birth. Data was used from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K), a nationally representative and longitudinal study of 21,260 kindergarteners. A series of Poisson regression models were used to predict externalizing behavior of fifth grade students from immigrant status and parent’s region of birth. Analyses controlled for demographic characteristics of the child and family and were adjusted by probability weights and primary sampling unit provided by the ECLS-K. After controlling for family income and parents’ educational status, immigrant youth had 0.04 lower externalizing behavior scores compared to native-born American youth (B = − 0.04, 95% CI − 0.06 to − 0.01). When considering differences by region of origin, youth from Asia (B = − 0.12, 95% CI − 0.17 to − 0.07) and Central America (B = − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.14 to − 0.05) had significantly lower externalizing behavior compared to native-born American youth, after controlling for covariates. In fifth grade, immigrant youth have significantly lower rates of externalizing behavior than native-born Americans. In particular, immigrant youth from Asia and Central America engaged in significantly less externalizing behavior than native-born Americans. No region of origin engaged in significantly more externalizing behavior than native-born youth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fry R, Lopez MH, Cohn V, Passel JS, Brown A. Modern immigration wave brings 59 million to US, driving population growth and change through 2065: views of immigration’s impact on US society mixed. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bersani BE, Loughran TA, Piquero AR. Comparing patterns and predictors of immigrant offending among a sample of adjudicated youth. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43:1914–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, DeLisi M, Maynard BR. The immigrant paradox: immigrants are less antisocial than native-born Americans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014;49(7):1129–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Schwartz SJ, Córdova D. An “immigrant paradox” for adolescent externalizing behavior? Evidence from a national sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(1):27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salas-Wright CP, Vaughn MG, Clark TT, Terzis LD, Córdova D. Substance use disorders among first-and second-generation immigrant adults in the United States: evidence of an immigrant paradox? J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014;75(6):958–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Almeida J, Biello KB, Pedraza F, Wintner S, Viruell-Fuentes E. The association between anti-immigrant policies and perceived discrimination among Latinos in the US: a multilevel analysis. SSM-Popul Health. 2016;2:897–903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pérez DJ, Fortuna L, Alegria M. Prevalence and correlates of everyday discrimination among US Latinos. J Community Psychol. 2008;36(4):421–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chilton LA, Handal GA, Paz-Soldan GJ, Granado-Villar DC, Gitterman BA, Brown JM, Cotton WH, Gambon TB, Gorski PA, Kraft CA, Kuo AA. Providing care for immigrant, migrant, and border children. Pediatrics 2013;131(6):e2028–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ayón C. Economic, social, and health effects of discrimination on Latino immigrant families. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kennedy S, Kidd MP, McDonald JT, Biddle N. The healthy immigrant effect: patterns and evidence from four countries. J Int Migr Integr. 2015;16(2):317–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farrington DP. Childhood aggression and adult violence: Early precursors and later-life outcomes. In: Pepler DJ, Rubin KH, editors. The development and treatment of childhood aggression. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1991. pp. 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deater-Deckard K, Dodge KA, Bates JE, Pettit GS. Multiple risk factors in the development of externalizing behavior problems: group and individual differences. Dev Psychopathol. 1998;10(3):469–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Webster-Stratton C, Hammond M. Conduct problems and level of social competence in Head Start children: prevalence, pervasiveness, and associated risk factors. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1998;1:101–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Conroy K, Sandel M, Zuckerman B. Poverty grown up: how childhood socioeconomic status impacts adult health. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2010;31(2):154–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tourangeau K, Nord C, Lê T, Sorongon AG, Najarian M. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS-K), combined user’s manual for the ECLS-K eighth-grade and K–8 full sample data files and electronic codebooks (NCES 2009–004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vaughn MG, Salas-Wright CP, Maynard BR, et al. Criminal epidemiology and the immigrant paradox: intergenerational discontinuity in violence and antisocial behavior among immigrants. J Crim Justice. 2014;42(6):483–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Butcher KF, Piehl AM. Cross-city evidence on the relationship between immigration and crime. J Policy Anal Manag. 1998;17:457–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hagan J, Palloni A. Sociological criminology and the mythology of Hispanic immigration and crime. Soc Probl. 1999;46:617–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez R, Rosenfeld R. Does immigration increase homicide? Negative evidence from three border cities. Sociol Q. 2001;42:559–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Raudenbush S. Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:224–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Piquero AR, Bersani BE, Loughran TA, Fagan J. Longitudinal patterns of legal socialization in first-generation immigrants, second-generation immigrants, and native-born serious youthful offenders. Crime Delinq. 2016;62:1403–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sampson RJ. Rethinking crime and immigration. Contexts 2008;7:28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tomé G, de Matos MG, Simões C, Camacho I, AlvesDiniz J. How can peer group influence the behavior of adolescents: explanatory model. Glob J Health Sci. 2012;4:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the United States. 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodore R. Kremer.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

The article makes use of publicly available secondary data that was collected by the National Center for Education Statistics, in which informed consent was obtained by the NCES from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kremer, T.R., Sutton, K. & Kremer, K.P. Immigrant Youth Have Significantly Lower Rates of Externalizing Behavior than Native-Born Americans: Differences by Region of Birth. J Immigrant Minority Health 21, 716–722 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0786-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0786-6

Keywords

Navigation