Immigrant Youth Have Significantly Lower Rates of Externalizing Behavior than Native-Born Americans: Differences by Region of Birth
- 124 Downloads
A large proportion of Americans have the opinion that immigrants increase crime. Although past research has not found immigrant status to be associated with criminal behavior, American immigration policy has historically discriminated against certain groups based on their region of birth due to safety concerns. The purpose of the present study was to examine differences in externalizing behavior by immigrant’s region of birth. Data was used from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort (ECLS-K), a nationally representative and longitudinal study of 21,260 kindergarteners. A series of Poisson regression models were used to predict externalizing behavior of fifth grade students from immigrant status and parent’s region of birth. Analyses controlled for demographic characteristics of the child and family and were adjusted by probability weights and primary sampling unit provided by the ECLS-K. After controlling for family income and parents’ educational status, immigrant youth had 0.04 lower externalizing behavior scores compared to native-born American youth (B = − 0.04, 95% CI − 0.06 to − 0.01). When considering differences by region of origin, youth from Asia (B = − 0.12, 95% CI − 0.17 to − 0.07) and Central America (B = − 0.10, 95% CI − 0.14 to − 0.05) had significantly lower externalizing behavior compared to native-born American youth, after controlling for covariates. In fifth grade, immigrant youth have significantly lower rates of externalizing behavior than native-born Americans. In particular, immigrant youth from Asia and Central America engaged in significantly less externalizing behavior than native-born Americans. No region of origin engaged in significantly more externalizing behavior than native-born youth.
KeywordsImmigrant Externalizing behavior Anger Aggression
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The article makes use of publicly available secondary data that was collected by the National Center for Education Statistics, in which informed consent was obtained by the NCES from all individual participants included in the study.
Research Involving Human and Animal Participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Fry R, Lopez MH, Cohn V, Passel JS, Brown A. Modern immigration wave brings 59 million to US, driving population growth and change through 2065: views of immigration’s impact on US society mixed. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015.Google Scholar
- 8.Chilton LA, Handal GA, Paz-Soldan GJ, Granado-Villar DC, Gitterman BA, Brown JM, Cotton WH, Gambon TB, Gorski PA, Kraft CA, Kuo AA. Providing care for immigrant, migrant, and border children. Pediatrics 2013;131(6):e2028–34.Google Scholar
- 9.Ayón C. Economic, social, and health effects of discrimination on Latino immigrant families. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute; 2015.Google Scholar
- 11.Farrington DP. Childhood aggression and adult violence: Early precursors and later-life outcomes. In: Pepler DJ, Rubin KH, editors. The development and treatment of childhood aggression. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1991. pp. 5–29.Google Scholar
- 15.Tourangeau K, Nord C, Lê T, Sorongon AG, Najarian M. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS-K), combined user’s manual for the ECLS-K eighth-grade and K–8 full sample data files and electronic codebooks (NCES 2009–004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2015.Google Scholar
- 25.Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the United States. 2016.Google Scholar