Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Comparison of Risk Factors and Prevalence in Native and Migrant Mothers of Portuguese Generation XXI Birth Cohort

Abstract

Epidemiological studies report conflicting findings regarding association between maternal immigration status and pregnancy outcomes. In this study we compared risk factors and prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in native Portuguese and migrants. Cross-sectional analysis was conducted using information collected at delivery from the participants of Generation XXI birth cohort. Logistic regression models were fitted to assess the association between migrant status and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Prevalence of risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes varied between native Portuguese and migrants: teenage mothers (5.6 and 2.0%), primiparae (57.1 and 63.9%), smoking during pregnancy (23.0 and 19.1%), twins (3.2 and 8.0%), and caesarean section (35.2 and 45.7%). Among singleton births, prevalence of low birthweight, preterm birth and small for gestational age were 7.3 and 3.9%, 7.5 and 6.2%, and 15.1 and 7.6%, respectively for native Portuguese and migrants. The native Portuguese had an adjusted significantly higher risk of low birthweight (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.30, 5.48) and small for gestational age (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.26, 3.21), but a similar risk for preterm birth (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.81, 2, 34). Migrant mothers presented a lower risk of low birthweight and small for gestation and data suggest a healthy immigrant effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Gissler M, Alexander S, MacFarlane A, Small R, Stray-Pedersen B, Zeitlin J, Zimbeck M, Gagnon A. Stillbirths and infant deaths among migrants in industrialized countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(2):134–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kim D, Saada A. The social determinants of infant mortality and birth outcomes in Western developed nations: a cross-country systematic review. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2013;10(6):2296–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pedersen GS, Mortensen LH, Gerster M, Rich-Edwards J, Andersen AM. Preterm birth and birthweight-for-gestational age among immigrant women in Denmark 1978–2007: a nationwide registry study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(6):534–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Auger N, Luo ZC, Platt RW, Daniel M. Do mother’s education and foreign born status interact to influence birth outcomes? Clarifying the epidemiological paradox and the healthy migrant effect. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62(5):402–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Castello A, Rio I, Martinez E, Rebagliato M, Barona C, Llacer A, Bolumar F. Differences in preterm and low birth weight deliveries between spanish and immigrant women: influence of the prenatal care received. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(3):175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Keygnaert I, Ivanova O, Guieu A, Van Parys AS, Leye E, Roelens K. What is the evidence on the reduction of inequalities in accessibility and quality of maternal health care delivery for migrants? A review of the existing evidence in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gagnon AJ, Zimbeck M, Zeitlin J, Alexander S, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, Desmeules M, Di Lallo D, Gagnon A, Gissler M, et al. Migration to western industrialised countries and perinatal health: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2009, 69(6):934–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Merry L, Small R, Blondel B, Gagnon AJ. International migration and caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Puthussery S. Perinatal outcomes among migrant mothers in the United Kingdom: Is it a matter of biology, behaviour, policy, social determinants or access to health care? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;32:39–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Almeida LM, Caldas J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Salcedo-Barrientos D, Dias S. Maternal healthcare in migrants: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Blumenshine P, Egerter S, Barclay CJ, Cubbin C, Braveman PA. Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3):263–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Urquia ML, O’Campo PJ, Heaman MI. Revisiting the immigrant paradox in reproductive health: the roles of duration of residence and ethnicity. Soc Sci Med (1982) 2012, 74(10):1610–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bollini P, Pampallona S, Wanner P, Kupelnick B. Pregnancy outcome of migrant women and integration policy: a systematic review of the international literature. Soc Sci Med (1982) 2009;68(3):452–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Bell R, Pearce MS, Parker L. Temporal changes in the distribution of population risk factors attenuate the reduction in perinatal mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(12):1299–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Varea C, Teran JM, Bernis C, Bogin B, Gonzalez-Gonzalez A. Is the economic crisis affecting birth outcome in Spain? Evaluation of temporal trend in underweight at birth (2003–2012). Ann Hum Biol. 2016;43(2):169–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gotsens M, Malmusi D, Villarroel N, Vives-Cases C, Garcia-Subirats I, Hernando C, Borrell C. Health inequality between immigrants and natives in Spain: the loss of the healthy immigrant effect in times of economic crisis. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(6):923–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gunnlaugsson G. Child health in Iceland before and after the economic collapse in 2008. Arch Dis Childhood. 2015;101:489–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zilko CE. Economic contraction and birth outcomes: an integrative review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(4):445–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dawson AL, Razzaghi H, Arth A, Canfield MA, Parker SE, Reefhuis J. Maternal exposures in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study: time trends of selected exposures. Birth Defects Res A. 2015;103(8):703–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhao G, Ford ES, Tsai J, Li C, Ahluwalia IB, Pearson WS, Balluz LS, Croft JB. Trends in health-related behavioral risk factors among pregnant women in the United States: 2001–2009. J Women’s Health. 2002;21(3):255–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Beck LF, Morrow B, Lipscomb LE, Johnson CH, Gaffield ME, Rogers M, Gilbert BC. Prevalence of selected maternal behaviors and experiences, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries (Washington, DC: 2002). 2002;51(2):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Racape J, Schoenborn C, Sow M, Alexander S, De Spiegelaere M. Are all immigrant mothers really at risk of low birth weight and perinatal mortality? The crucial role of socio-economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Verropoulou G, Tsimbos C. Modelling the effects of maternal socio-demographic characteristics on the preterm and term birth weight distributions in Greece using quantile regression. J Biosoc Sci. 2013;45(3):375–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ, Singh G, Shah R, Redelmeier DA. Results of the recent immigrant pregnancy and perinatal long-term evaluation study (RIPPLES). CMAJ. 2007, 176(10):1419–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Baron R, Mannien J, te Velde SJ, Klomp T, Hutton EK, Brug J. Socio-demographic inequalities across a range of health status indicators and health behaviours among pregnant women in prenatal primary care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zeitlin J, Wildman K, Breart G, Alexander S, Barros H, Blondel B, Buitendijk S, Gissler M, Macfarlane A. PERISTAT: indicators for monitoring and evaluating perinatal health in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13(3 Suppl):29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Larsen PS, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Adamson A, Barros H, Bonde JP, Brescianini S, Brophy S, Casas M, Charles MA, Devereux G, et al. Pregnancy and birth cohort resources in europe: a large opportunity for aetiological child health research. Paediatric Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(4):393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Alves E, Correia S, Barros H, Azevedo A. Prevalence of self-reported cardiovascular risk factors in Portuguese women: a survey after delivery. Int J Public Health. 2012;57(5):837–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Teixeira C, Correia S, Victora CsG, Barros H. The Brazilian preference: cesarean delivery among immigrants in Portugal. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e60168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kramer MS, Platt RW, Wen SW, Joseph KS, Allen A, Abrahamowicz M, Blondel B, Breart G. A new and improved population-based Canadian reference for birth weight for gestational age. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):E35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Correia S, Rodrigues T, Montenegro N, Barros H. Critical evaluation of national vital statistics: the case of preterm birth trends in Portugal. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(11):1215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. (0042-9686 (Print)).

  34. 34.

    Sobotka T, Zemen K, Lesthaeghe R, Frejka T, Neels K. Postponement and recuperation in cohort fertility: Austria, Germany and Switzerland in a European Context. Comp Popul Studies. 2011;36(2–3):417–52.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663–737.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Restrepo-Mendez MC, Lawlor DA, Horta BL, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Menezes AM, Barros FC, Victora CG. The association of maternal age with birthweight and gestational age: a cross-cohort comparison. Paediatric Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29(1):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nair M, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Establishing a national maternal morbidity outcome indicator in England: a population-based study using routine hospital data. (1932–6203 (Electronic)).

  38. 38.

    Bandyopadhyay M, Small R, Watson LF, Brown S. Life with a new baby: how do immigrant and Australian-born women’s experiences compare? Australian New Zealand J Public Health. 2010;34(4):412–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Braveman PA. Monitoring equity in health and healthcare: a conceptual framework. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21(3):181–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Higginbottom GM, Vallianatos H, Forgeron J, Gibbons D, Mamede F, Barolia R. Food choices and practices during pregnancy of immigrant women with high-risk pregnancies in Canada: a pilot study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:370.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lindsay AC, Wallington SF, Greaney ML, Hasselman MH, Tavares Machado MM, Mezzavilla RS. Brazilian immigrant mothers’ beliefs and practices related to infant feeding: a qualitative study. J Human Lact. 2016;33(3):595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kramer MS. The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. J Nutr. 2003;133(5 Suppl 2):1592s–6s.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also wish to express their gratitude to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology for supporting their institution, the Epidemiology Research Unit of Institute of Public Health University of Porto (UID/DTP/04750/2013), and specific Grant awards (SFRH/BPD/75918/2011, PTDC/DTPSAP/ 6384/2014 and SFRH/BSAB/113778/2015).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HB was responsible for the design and assembling of Generation XXI birth cohort. MK and HB conceived and designed the study and analysis. MK, SC and HB prepared the datasets and analysed the data. MK drafted the manuscript. HB reviewed, edited and revised the manuscript as well as supervised all the processes. All authors interpreted data and revised the manuscript critically for intellectual content. Finally, all the authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Musa Abubakar Kana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kana, M.A., Correia, S. & Barros, H. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Comparison of Risk Factors and Prevalence in Native and Migrant Mothers of Portuguese Generation XXI Birth Cohort. J Immigrant Minority Health 21, 307–314 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0761-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Migrants
  • Portuguese
  • Risk factors
  • Adverse pregnancy outcomes