Immigrant Generational Status and Developmental Problems among Prematurely Born Children

  • Phylicia T. Bediako
  • Rhonda BeLue
  • Marianne M. Hillemeier
Original Paper

Abstract

Immigrants in the U.S. often have comparatively favorable health outcomes despite relative socioeconomic disadvantage- a phenomenon termed the Immigrant Paradox. This study examined the relationship between family immigrant status and developmental problems among children born preterm. The 2011–2012 National Survey of Children’s Health data collected through a telephone based survey based on parental report of prematurity and other comorbidities were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to examine seven developmental outcomes. Preterm 1st/2nd generation children had fewer developmental problems than preterm 3rd generation children. Controlling for socioeconomic status and other covariates, 1st/2nd generation children had significantly lower odds of developmental delay, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and hearing problems. Consistent with the Immigrant Paradox, prematurely born children of immigrants had comparable or better developmental outcomes than preterm children of US born parents despite socioeconomic disadvantage. Further research to explicate mechanisms responsible for the protective health effects observed is warranted.

Keywords

Health disparities Preterm birth Child development Immigrant Paradox 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project described was supported by awards T32 DA017629 and P50 DA010075 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Infrastructure support was provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Grant R24HD041025. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, or the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. 1.
    Fawke J. Neurological outcomes following preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;12:374–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salt A, Redshaw M. Neurodevelopmental follow-up after preterm birth: follow up after two years. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:185–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of children of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Semin Neonatol. 2000;5:89–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun Y, Vestergaard M, Pedersen CB, Christensen J, Basso O, Olsen J. Gestational age, birth weight, intrauterine growth, and the risk of epilepsy. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;167:262–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson S, Hollis C, Kochhar P, Hennessy E, Wolke D, Marlow N. Autism spectrum disorders in extremely preterm children. J Pediatr. 2010;156:525–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson S, Hollis C, Kochhar P, Hennessy E, Wolke D, Marlow N. Psychiatric disorders in extremely preterm children: longitudinal finding at age 11 years in the EPICure study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49:453–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Larsson HJ, Eaton WW, Madsen KM, Vestergaard M, Olesen AV, Agerbo E, et al. Risk factors for autism: perinatal factors, parental psychiatric history, and socioeconomic status. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:916–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Limperopoulos C, Bassan H, Sullivan NR, Soul JS, Robertson RL, Moore M, et al. Positive screening for autism in ex-preterm infants: prevalence and risk factors. Pediatrics. 2008;121:758–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. The Lancet. 2008;371:261–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schendel D, Bhasin TK. Birth weight and gestational age characteristics of children with autism, including a comparison with other developmental disabilities. Pediatrics. 2008;121:1155–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Chir A, Gibson AT, Wilkinson AR, et al. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:378–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cervantes A, Keith L, Wyshak G. Adverse birth outcomes among native-born and immigrant women: replicating national evidence regarding Mexicans at the local level. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3:99–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Preterm birth 1: epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. The Lancet. 2008;371:75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guendelman S, English PB. Effect of United States residence on birth outcomes among Mexican immigrants: an exploratory study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:S30–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guendelman S, Buekens P, Blondel B, Kaminski M, Notzon FC. Birth outcomes of immigrant women in the United States, France, and Belgium. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3:177–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zambrana RE, Scrimshaw SC, Collins NL, Dunkel-Schetter C. Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: the role of acculturation. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1022–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Teruya SA, Bazargan-Hejazi S. The immigrant and Hispanic paradoxes: a systematic review of their predictions and effects. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2013;35:486–509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abraido-Lanza AF, Dohrenwend BP, Ng-Mak DS, Turner JB. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypothesis. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1543–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forna F, Jamieson DJ, Sanders D, Lindsay MK. Pregnancy outcomes in foreign-born and US-born women. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;83:257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gould JB, Madan A, Qin C, Chavez G. Perinatal outcomes in two dissimilar immigrant populations in the United States: A dual epidemiological paradox. Pediatrics. 2003;111:e676–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Janevic T, Savitz DA, Janevic M. Maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among immigrant women to the United States from Eastern Europe: a test of the healthy migrant hypothesis. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:429–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh GK, Yu SM. Adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences between US- and foreign-born women in major US racial and ethnic groups. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:837–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guendelman S. Health and disease among Hispanics. In: Loue S, editor. Handbook Immigrant Health. New York: Plenum Press; 1998. p. 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Padilla YC, Hamilton ER, Hummer RA. Beyond the epidemiological paradox: the health of Mexican-American children at age five. Soc Sci Q. 2009;90:1072–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Padilla YC, Boardman JD, Hummer RA, Espitia M. Is the Mexican American “epidemiologic paradox” advantage at birth maintained through early childhood? Soc Forces. 2002;80:1101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Center for Health Statistics. The National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) 2011/12: The Public Use Data File. Hyattsville: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative (CAHMI). 2011–2012 NSCH: Child Health Indicator and Subgroups SAS Codebook, Version 1.0 [Internet]. Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health, sponsored by the Maternal and Child Health Bureau; 2013. Available from: http://www.childhealthdata.org.
  28. 28.
    BeLue R, Miranda P, Elewonibi M, Hillemeier MM. Reasons and barriers to obtaining insurance among US children: The role of generational status. Health Women Child. Fam. Boston, MA; 2014.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taverno SE, Rollins BY, Francis LA. Generation, language, body mass index, and activity patterns in Hispanic children. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:145–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu SM, Lin SC, Adirim T. Selected health status measures of children from US immigrant families. ISRN Pediatr. 2013;2013:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cherry K. Erik Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development: The eight stages of psychosocial development [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://psychology.about.com/od/psychosocialtheories/a/psychosocial.htm.
  32. 32.
    University of Michigan Developmental milestones [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.med.umich.edu/yourchild/topics/devmile.htm#whatis.
  33. 33.
    SAS Institute. Inc. SAS/STAT 9.2 User’s Guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2008.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mandell DS, Listerud J, Levy SE, Pinto-Martin JA. Race differences in the age at diagnosis among medicaid-eligible children with autism. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41:1447–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morgan PL, Staff J, Hillemeier MM, Farkas G, Maczuga S. Racial and ethnic disparities in adhd diagnosis from kindergarten to eighth grade. Pediatrics. 2013;132:85–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arpino C, Compagnone E, Montanaro ML, Cacciatore D, De Luca A, Cerulli A, et al. Preterm birth and neurodevelopmental outcome: a review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26:1139–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJS. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:728–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johnson S. Cognitive and behavioural outcomes following very preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;12:363–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pugliese M, Rossi C, Guidotti I, Gallo C, Della Casa E, Bertoncelli N, et al. Preterm birth and developmental problems in infancy and preschool age Part II: cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1653–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Acevedo-Garcia D, Soobader M-J, Berkman LF. The differential effect of foreign-born status on low birth weight by race/ethnicity and education. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e20–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vega WA, Kolody B, Hwang J, Noble A, Porter PA. Perinatal drug use among immigrant and native-born Latinas. Subst Use Misuse. 1997;32:43–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Perreira KM, Cortes KE. Race/ethnicity and nativity differences in alcohol and tobacco use during pregnancy. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1629–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Madan A, Palaniappan L, Urizar G, Wang Y, Fortmann SP, Gould JB. Sociocultural factors that affect pregnancy outcomes in two dissimilar immigrant groups in the United States. J Pediatr. 2006;148:341–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yoshikawa H. Immigrants raising citizens: undocumented parents and their young children. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phylicia T. Bediako
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rhonda BeLue
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marianne M. Hillemeier
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and AdministrationPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Population Research InstitutePennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations