Second and Thirdhand Smoke Exposure, Attitudes and Protective Practices: Results from a Survey of Hispanic Residents in Multi-unit Housing
Secondhand and third hand smoke (SHS, THS) exposure is prevalent in multi-unit housing (MUH). Minorities and low-income MUH residents are disproportionally exposed to SHS and THS compared to other populations. This study describes the characteristics, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to SHS, THS and marijuana smoke exposure (MSHS) of a sample of Hispanic tenants in randomly selected MUH units in eastern metro Los Angeles (n = 402). Although most participants (97%) banned smoking inside their homes, 80% reported infiltration of SHS inside their apartments within the last year. Most (85%) favored a complete ban on smoking in apartment buildings. Twenty-eight percent did not know that marijuana (MSHS) smoke exposure is also harmful to their health. Knowledge scores were higher among Spanish-speakers (p < 0.05). Given the interpersonal barriers to advocating for change, widespread policy and communication interventions are also necessary to protect Hispanic MUH residents’ rights to clean air in their living space.
KeywordsSecondhand smoke Thirdhand smoke Hispanics Multi-unit housing Marihuana secondhand smoke
This study was funded by the Tobacco Related Disease Research Program (Grant: 21RT-0119) and the TRDRP Cornelius Hopper Diversity Award.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest. Authors Jennifer B. Unger, Tess Boley Cruz, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati, Daniel Soto, and Angelica Delgado Rendon have received research grants from the Tobacco Related Disease Research Program for this and other research studies. Other than this the authors declare that they do not have any other conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.California Department of Public Health, C.T.C.P., California Tobacco Facts and Figs. 2015. 2015: Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
- 9.Winickoff JP, Friebely J, Tanski SE, Sherrod C, Matt GE, Hovell MF, McMillen RC. Beliefs About the Health Effects of “Thirdhand” Smoke and Home Smoking Bans. Pediatrics, 2009. 123(1): p. e74 - e79.Google Scholar
- 14.ANRF. Summary of 100 % Smokefree State Laws and Population Protected by 100 % U.S. Smokefree Laws. Smokefree Lists, Maps, and Data 2016 February 24, 2016. Accessed 7 Mar 2016.Google Scholar
- 16.Drach LL, et al. The Acceptability of Comprehensive Smoke-Free Policies to Low-Income Tenants in Subsidized Housing. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(3) : 1–3.Google Scholar
- 18.King BA, Patel R, Babb SD. Prevalence of Smokefree Home Rules - United States, 1992–1993 and 2010–2011. In:Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, C.f.D.C.A. Prevention, Editor. 2014, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta 30329–4027.765–9.Google Scholar
- 31.Office of the Assessor, L.A.C. Apartment House Listing. http://assessor.lacounty.gov/extranet/outsidesales/apartholist.aspx. Accessed 10 Jan 2012Google Scholar
- 32.Cuéllar I, Arnold B, Maldonado R. Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II: A Revision of the Original ARSMA Scale. Hisp J Behav Sci. 1995. 17(3).Google Scholar
- 35.National Institutes of Health, U.S.F.a.D.A., Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study: Final adult baseline (Wave 1) Questionnaire. 2013, National Institutes of Health: Bethesda.Google Scholar
- 36.StataCorp Stata. Statistical Software: Release 13, SLP., Editor. 2013: College Station.Google Scholar
- 37.Homa DM, et al. Vital Signs: Disparities in Nonsmokers’ Exposure to Secondhand Smoke - United States, 1999–2012. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(4): 103–8.Google Scholar