Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1042–1049 | Cite as

Local-Level Immigration Enforcement and Food Insecurity Risk among Hispanic Immigrant Families with Children: National-Level Evidence

  • Stephanie PotochnickEmail author
  • Jen-Hao Chen
  • Krista Perreira
Original Paper


Local-level immigration enforcement generates fear and reduces social service use among Hispanic immigrant families but the health impacts are largely unknown. We examine the consequence of 287(g), the foundational enforcement program, for one critical risk factor of child health—food insecurity. We analyze nationally representative data on households with children from pooled cross-sections of the Current Population Survey Food Supplemental Survey. We identify the influence of 287(g) on food insecurity pre-post-policy accounting for metro-area and year fixed-effects. We find that 287(g) is associated with a 10 percentage point increase in the food insecurity risk of Mexican non-citizen households with children, the group most vulnerable to 287(g). We find no evidence of spillover effects on the broader Hispanic community. Our results suggest that local immigration enforcement policies have unintended consequences. Although 287(g) has ended, other federal-local immigration enforcement partnerships persist, which makes these findings highly policy relevant.


Immigrant health Local immigration policy Food insecurity 



We thank Juan Pedroza for his thoughtful insight and support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Passel JS, Cohn DV. Trends in unauthorized immigration: undocumented inflow now trails legal inflow, vol. 2. Washington: Pew Hispanic Center; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brabeck K, Xu Q. The impact of detention and deportation on Latino immigrant children and families: a quantitative exploration. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2010;32(3):341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dreby J. The burden of deportation on children in Mexican immigrant families. J Marriage Fam. 2012;74(4):829–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Landale NS, Hardie JH, Oropesa R, Hillemeier MM. Behavioral functioning among Mexican-origin children does parental legal status matter? J Health Soc Behav. 2015;56(1):2–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ortega AN, Horwitz SM, Fang H, Kuo AA, Wallace SP, Inkelas M. Documentation status and parental concerns about development in young US children of Mexican origin. Acad Pediatr. 2009;9(4):278–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshikawa H, Kalil A. The effects of parental undocumented status on the developmental contexts of young children in immigrant families. Child Dev Perspect. 2011;5(4):291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook JT, Frank DA. Food security, poverty, and human development in the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136(1):193–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gundersen C, Kreider B, Pepper J. The economics of food insecurity in the United States. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2011;33(3):281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chilton M, Black MM, Berkowitz C, Casey PH, Cook J, Cutts D, et al. Food insecurity and risk of poor health among US-born children of immigrants. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(3):556–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capps R, Koball H, Campetella A, Perreira K, Hooker S, Pedroza JM. Implications of Immigration Enforcement Activities for the well-being of children in immigrant families. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Institute; 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martinez O. Immigration policy and access to health services. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16:563–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kohli A, Markowitz PL, Chavez L. Secure communities by the numbers: an analysis of demographics and due process. Berkeley: The Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy; 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hagan JM, Rodriguez N, Castro B. Social effects of mass deportations by the United States government, 2000–10. Ethn Racial Stud. 2011;34(8):1374–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koball H, Capps R, Perreira K, Campetella A, Hooker S, Pedroza JM, et al. Health and social service needs of US-citizen children with detained or deported immigrant parents. Washington: Urban Institute and Migration Policy Institute; 2015.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rhodes SD, Mann L, Simán FM, Song E, Alonzo J, Downs M, et al. The impact of local immigration enforcement policies on the health of immigrant hispanics/latinos in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(2):329–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Capps R, Rosenblum MR, Rodriguez C, Chishti M. Delegation and divergence: a study of 287 (g) state and local immigration enforcement. Washington: Migration Policy Institute; 2011.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gill H, Nguyen MT, Parker KL, Weissman D. Legal and social perspectives on local enforcement of immigration under the section 287 (g) program. Pop Gov. 2009;74(3):1–14.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lopez W, Kruger D, Delva J, Llanes M, Ledon C, Waller A, et al. Health Implications of an immigration raid: findings from a Latino community in the Midwestern United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0390-6.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perreira KM, Crosnoe R, Fortuny K, Pedroza J, Ulvestad K, Weiland C, et al. Barriers to immigrants’ access to health and human services programs. ASPE Research Brief. Washington: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. (2012).
  20. 20.
    Watson T. Inside the refrigerator: immigration enforcement and chilling effects in medicaid participation. Am Econ J. 2014;6(3):313–38.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    White K, Yeager VA, Menachemi N, Scarinci IC. Impact of Alabama’s immigration law on access to health care among Latina immigrants and children: implications for national reform. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):397–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hacker K, Chu J, Arsenault L, Marlin RP. Provider’s perspectives on the impact of immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) activity on immigrant health. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(2):651.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hardy LJ, Getrich CM, Quezada JC, Guay A, Michalowski RJ, Henley E. A call for further research on the impact of state-level immigration policies on public health. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1250–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Valdez CR, Lewis Valentine J, Padilla B. Why we stay: immigrants’ motivations for remaining in communities impacted by anti-immigration policy. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2013;19(3):279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cavazos-Rehg PA, Zayas LH, Spitznagel EL. Legal status, emotional well-being and subjective health status of Latino immigrants. J Nat Med Assoc. 2007;99(10):1126.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lopez MH, Minushkin S, Center PH. Hispanics see their situation in US deteriorating; oppose key immigration enforcement measures. Washington: Pew Hispanic Center; 2008.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martin KS, Rogers BL, Cook JT, Joseph HM. Social capital is associated with decreased risk of hunger. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(12):2645–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Viruell-Fuentes EA. Beyond acculturation: immigration, discrimination, and health research among Mexicans in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(7):1524–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Toomey RB, Umaña-Taylor AJ, Williams DR, Harvey-Mendoza E, Jahromi LB, Updegraff KA. Impact of Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law on utilization of health care and public assistance among Mexican-origin adolescent mothers and their mother figures. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(S1):S28–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vargas ED. Immigration enforcement and mixed-status families: the effects of risk of deportation on Medicaid use. Child Youth Serv Rev Edw. 2015;57:83–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kostandini G, Mykerezi E, Escalante C. The impact of immigration enforcement on the US Farming sector. Am J Agric Econ. 2014;96(1):172–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Neil KS. Immigration enforcement by local police under 287 (g) and growth of unauthorized immigrant and other populations. Available at SSRN 2210765 2013.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parrado EA. Immigration enforcement policies, the economic recession, and the size of local Mexican immigrant populations. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 2012;641(1):16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu Z, Dow WH, Norton EC. Effect of drive-through delivery laws on postpartum length of stay and hospital charges. J Health Econ. 2004;23(1):129–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT press; 2010.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pham H, Van PH. Economic impact of local immigration regulation: an empirical analysis. Immigr Nat’lity L Rev. 2010;31:687.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Walker KE, Leitner H. The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography. 2011;32(2):156–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wong TK. 287 (g) and the politics of interior immigration control in the United States: explaining local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2012;38(5):737–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kimbro RT, Denney JT, Panchang S. Individual, family, and neighborhood characteristics and children’s food insecurity. J Appl Res Child. 2012;3(1):8.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    (FOIA) FoIAR. ICE FOIA Case Number 2015-ICFO-89811. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; 2015.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoynes HW, Miller DL, Schaller J. Who suffers during recessions?. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    (ICE) IaCE. 287(g) Master Stats-Oct. 31, 2010. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Potochnick
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jen-Hao Chen
    • 2
  • Krista Perreira
    • 3
  1. 1.Truman School of Public AffairsUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Sciences, Truman School of Public AffairsUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Public PolicyUniversity of North Carolina Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations