Association Among Subtypes of Bullying Status and Sexually-Risky Behaviors of Urban African American Adolescents in Chicago
- 550 Downloads
Bullying is found to be associated with various negative psychosocial outcomes. However, few studies have explored the association between bullying involvement and sexually-risky behaviors. Youth were recruited from three high schools, one youth church group, two community youth programs, and four public venues. Six hundred-and-thirty-eight urban African American adolescents (aged 12-22) in Chicago completed a self-report questionnaire. Major findings indicated that males were more likely than females to have sex with someone in exchange for drugs. Bullying perpetration, victimization, and perpetration–victimization were negatively associated with having sex with a condom. Older youth, and those identified as perpetrators and perpetrator-victims were more likely to have impregnated someone or been pregnant. Stress and coping framework should be considered. Bullying prevention should provide youth with several healthy coping strategies for reducing sexually-risky behaviors. Community-based and school-based violence prevention programs need to consider sexual risk outcomes associated with involvement in bullying.
KeywordsAfrican Americans Bullying Sexually-risky behaviors Violence Youth
This study was funded by Grants from the Center for Health Administration Studies and the STI/HIV Intervention Network at the University of Chicago, which were awarded to Dr. Dexter R. Voisin.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
All study procedure received full human subject approval from the University of Chicago, School of Social Service Administration Institutional Review Board. No identifying information was retained or reported on the study participants.
All youth provided informed assent prior to being enrolled in the study.
- 1.Robers S, Zhang A, Morgan RE, Musu-Gillette L. Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2014 (NCES 2015-072/NCJ 248036). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice; 2015.Google Scholar
- 2.Gladden RM, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Hamburger ME, Lumpkin CD. Bullying Surveillance among Youths: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education; 2014.Google Scholar
- 9.Kamen C, Bergstrom J, Vorasarun C, Mardini M, Patrick R, Lee S, Lazar R, Koopman C, Gore-Felton C. The impact of childhood bullying among HIV-positive men: psychosocial correlates and risk factors. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37:273–81. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.09.016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Espelage DL, Mebane SE, Swearer SM. Gender differences in bullying: moving beyond mean level differences. In: Espelage DL, Swearer SM, editors. Bullying in American schools: a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004. p. 15–35.Google Scholar
- 20.Friedman MS, Marshal MP, Guadamuz TE, Wei C, Wong CF, Saewyc EM, Stall R. A meta-analysis of disparities in childhood sexual abuse, parental physical abuse, and peer victimization among sexual minority and sexual nonminority individuals. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:1481–94. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.190009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kosciw JG, Greytak EA, Bartkiewicz MJ, Boesen MJ, Palmer NA. The 2011 national school climate survey: the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN; 2012.Google Scholar
- 22.Blake SM, Ledsky R, Lehman T, Goodenow C, Sawyer R, Hack T. Preventing sexual risk behaviors among gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents: the benefits of gay-sensitive HIV instruction in schools. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:940–6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.6.940.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Voisin D, Chen P, Fullilove R, Jackobson K. The relationship between community violence exposure and sexual behaviors among a nationally representative sample of adolescents: examining the moderating effects of gender and ethnicity. J Soc Serv Res. 2015;. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2014.987941.Google Scholar
- 35.Espelage DL, De La Rue L. Examining predictors of bullying and sexual violence perpetration among middle school female students. In: Russell BL, editor. Perceptions of female offenders: how stereotypes and social norms affect criminal justice responses. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Seth P, Raiji PT, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Rose E. Psychological distress as a correlate of a biologically confirmed STI, risky sexual practices, self-efficacy and communication with male sex partners in African-American female adolescents. Psychol Health Med. 2009;14:291–300. doi: 10.1080/13548500902730119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Sullivan TN, Farrell AD, Kliewer W. Peer victimization in early adolescence: association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18:119–37. doi: 10.1017/S095457940606007X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Alleyne-Green B, Coleman-Cowger VH, Henry DB. Dating violence perpetration and/or victimization and associated sexual risk behaviors among a sample of inner-city African American and hispanic adolescent females. J Interpers Violence. 2012;27:1457–73. doi: 10.1177/0886260511425788.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 51.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance: United States 2009. MMWR. 2010;59:1–142.Google Scholar
- 54.Achenbach TM. Integrative guide for the 1991 child behavior checklist I/4-18, YSR, and teacher report form profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry; 1991.Google Scholar
- 56.Muthen L, Muthen B. Mplus user’s guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen; 2011.Google Scholar
- 57.Little JR, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.Google Scholar
- 58.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman M, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final data for 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. .Google Scholar
- 63.Brown SS, Eisenberg L. (Eds.). The best intentions: unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington: National Academies Press;1995Google Scholar