Skip to main content
Log in

Participation and Risk of High Grade Cytological Lesions Among Immigrants and Italian-Born Women in an Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Central Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies analyzed the risk for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) among immigrants and natives attending organized cervical cancer (CC) screening programs (SP). We evaluated participation and diagnosis of HSIL+ by country of birth with logistic models. Overall 540,779 invitation letters were delivered to target women of Florence SP in three screening rounds (years 2000–2002, 2003–2005, 2006–2008). The probability of attending screening was lower for immigrants than natives, but the difference decreased from 35 % (1st round) to 20 % (2nd–3rd round) for women born in high migration pressure (HMP) countries. The risk of HSIL+ was double than natives for HMP-born women from countries with high prevalence of human papillomavirus, even adjusting for age and previous history of Pap test. This is an important public health problem due to an increasing proportion over time of immigrant women with a lower attendance and greater risk for CC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT)—La popolazione straniera residente in Italia 1° gennaio 2008. http://www3.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20081009_00/testointegrale20081009.pdf.

  2. The Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT)—La popolazione straniera residente in Italia al 1° gennaio 2013. http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/96694.

  3. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Italian Association of Cancer Registries (AIRTUM). I numeri del cancro in Italia 2013. http://www.registri-tumori.it/PDF/AIOM2013/I_numeri_del_cancro_2013.pdf.

  5. Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Second edition-summary document. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:448–58.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zappa M, Visioli CB, Ciatto S, et al. Lower protection of cytological screening for adenocarcinomas and shorter protection for younger women: the results of a case–control study in Florence. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1784–6.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Crocetti E, Manneschi G, Visioli CB, et al. Risk of invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III in central Italy by area of birth. J Med Screen. 2010;17:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. La salute della popolazione immigrata: metodologia di analisi. Progetto: Promozione della Salute della Popolazione Immigrata in Italia. Accordo Ministero della Salute/CCM-Regione Marche 2007–2009. http://www.ccm-network.it/documenti_Ccm/prg_area5/Prg_5_Immigrati_metodologia.pdf.pdf.

  10. Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Ferrer E, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1789–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012;12:308–31. http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0260.

  12. Margins postestimation. In: StataCorp. 2011. Stata: Release 12 Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. https://files.nyu.edu/nnm231/public/Stata/Additional%20Resources/IntroToSTATA.pdf.

  13. Determination of the Italian Medicines Agency of 20 March 2008 (in Italian). Official Gazette of the Italian Republic. General Series No. 76; 31 March 2008.

  14. GISCI. Gruppo Italiano Screening Cervicale (GISCi). Survey about Migrant women. http://www.gisci.it/documenti/convegni/rivadelgarda2013/20130523/campari_gisci_20130523.pdf.

  15. Valsecchi M, Cogo C, Saugo M, et al. Donne immigrate e screening cervicale nel Veneto. Ann Ig 2013;25 Suppl 1:1–8.

  16. Iossa A, Visioli CB, Carozzi FM, et al. I programmi di screening cervicale in Toscana. In: Mantellini P, editors. I programmi di screening della regione Toscana. Quatordicesimo Rapporto Annuale. Risultati e attività di ricerca (dati 2012). Firenze: Scientific Press; 2013:39–68.

  17. Rondet C, Lapostolle A, Soler M, Grillo F, Parizot I, Chauvin P. Are immigrants and nationals born to immigrants at higher risk for delayed or no lifetime breast and cervical cancer screening? The results from a population-based survey in Paris metropolitan area in 2010. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e87046.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodríguez-Salés V, Roura E, Ibañez R, Peris M, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. Coverage of cervical cancer screening in Catalonia for the period 2008–2011 among immigrants and Spanish-born women. Front Oncol. 2013;3:297.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khadilkar A, Chen Y. Rate of cervical cancer screening associated with immigration status and number of years since immigration in Ontario Canada. J Immigr Minor Health. 2013;15:244–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Azerkan F, Sparén P, Sandin S, et al. Cervical screening participation and risk among Swedish-born and immigrant women in Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:937–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lofters AK, Moineddin R, Hwang SW, et al. Predictors of low cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario Canada. BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:20.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pons-Vigués M, Puigpinós-Riera R, Rodríguez-Sanz M, et al. Preventive control of breast and cervical cancer in immigrant and native women in Spain: the role of country of origin and social class. Int J Health Serv. 2011;41:483–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanz-Barbero B, Regidor E, Galindo S. Impact of geographic origin on gynecological cancer screening in Spain. Rev Saude Publica. 2011;45:1019–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Swan J, Breen N, Graubard BI, et al. Data and trends in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2010;116:4872–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Norredam M, Nielsen SS, Krasnik A. Migrants’ utilization of somatic healthcare services in Europe–a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:555–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Latif E. Recent immigrants and the use of cervical cancer screening test in Canada. J Immigr Minor Health. 2010;12:1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Casamitjana M, Sala M, Ochoa D, et al. Results of a cervical cancer screening programme from an area of Barcelona (Spain) with a large immigrant population. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19:499–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van der Aa MA, Siesling S, Louwman MW, et al. Geographical relationships between sociodemographic factors and incidence of cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989–2003. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17:453–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Cervical cancer screening by immigrant and minority women in Canada. J Immigr Minor Health. 2007;9:323–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Woltman KJ, Newbold KB. Immigrant women and cervical cancer screening uptake: a multilevel analysis. Can J Public Health. 2007;98:470–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsui J, Saraiya M, Thompson T, et al. Cervical cancer screening among foreign-born women by birthplace and duration in the United States. J Women’s Health. 2007;16:1447–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van Leeuwen AW, de Nooijer P, Hop WC. Screening for cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;105:270–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. De Alba I, Hubbell FA, McMullin JM, et al. Impact of US citizenship status on cancer screening among immigrant women. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:290–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goel MS, Wee CC, McCarthy EP, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening: the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:1028–35.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. GISCI. Gruppo Italiano Screening Cervicale (GISCi). La survey 2012. Dati di estensione e adesione. Convegno Nazionale Gruppo Italiano Screeening Cervicarcinoma (GISCI) 2013. http://www.gisci.it/documenti/convegni/rivadelgarda2013/20130523/giorgi-rossi_gisci_20130523.pdf.

  36. Schoueri-Mychasiw N, McDonald PW. Factors associated with underscreening for cervical cancer among women in Canada. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:6445–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. White K, Garces IC, Bandura L, McGuire AA, Scarinci IC. Design and evaluation of a theory-based, culturally relevant outreach model for breast and cervical cancer screening for Latina immigrants. Ethn Dis. 2012;22:274–80.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Redwood-Campbell L, Fowler N, Laryea S, Howard M, Kaczorowski J. ‘Before you teach me, I cannot know’: immigrant women’s barriers and enablers with regard to cervical cancer screening among different ethnolinguistic groups in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2011;102:230–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiu LF. Inequalities of access to cancer screening: a literature review. In: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes. Cancer Screening Series 1, 2003. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/publications/cs1.html.

  40. IARC Handbook of Cancer Prevention. Cervix cancer screening. Int Agency Res Cancer. 2005;10:201–12.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aminisani N, Armstrong BK, Egger S, Canfell K. Impact of organised cervical screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in migrant women in Australia. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:491.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tornesello ML, Giorgi Rossi P, Buonaguro L, Buonaguro FM, HPV Prevalence Italian Working Group. Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Neoplasia among Migrant Women Living in Italy. Front Oncol. 2014;4:31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Arnold M, Razum O, Coebergh JW. Cancer risk diversity in non-western migrants to Europe: an overview of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:2647–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Report PASSI (Progressi delle Aziende Sanitarie per la Salute in Italia) 2009. http://www.epicentro.iss.it/passi/rapporto2009/cervicale/Passi_cervice.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Guido Miccinesi for his statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Beatriz Visioli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Visioli, C.B., Crocetti, E., Zappa, M. et al. Participation and Risk of High Grade Cytological Lesions Among Immigrants and Italian-Born Women in an Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Central Italy. J Immigrant Minority Health 17, 670–678 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0050-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0050-7

Keywords

Navigation