Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 1025–1032 | Cite as

Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Measure of Globalization Influence on Health Risk (MGIHR) Among Mexican Women with Breast Cancer

  • Jesse N. Nodora
  • Scott C. Carvajal
  • Rebeca Robles-Garcia
  • Francisco Páez Agraz
  • Adrian Daneri-Navarro
  • Maria Mercedes Meza-Montenegro
  • Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan
  • Maria Elena Martinez
Original Paper
  • 249 Downloads

Abstract

Lacking in the literature are data addressing the extent to which changes in reproductive and lifestyle factors predispose women in developing nations to higher breast cancer rates, and the degree to which these are due to globalization influences. This article describes the development and psychometric assessment of an instrument intended to measure global, predominantly U.S., influences on breast cancer risk profile among women residing in Mexico. Using investigator consensus and a focus group methodology, the Measure of Globalization Influence on Health Risk (MGIHR) was developed and completed by 341 women. Psychometric analysis support the use of an 11-item Consumerism and Modernity scale and 7-item Reproductive Control and Gender Role scale. The MGIHR is a valid and reliable instrument for understanding changing lifestyle and reproductive factors for breast cancer risk and may provide a more complete understanding of breast cancer development and needed interventions.

Keywords

Mexican women Breast cancer risk factors Scale validation Globalization Westernization 

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10. 2010 Institution Lyon, France Nov 28 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chavarri-Guerra Y, Villarreal-Garza C, Liedke PE, Knaul F, Mohar A, Finkelstein DM, Goss PE. Breast cancer in Mexico: a growing challenge to health and the health system. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):e335–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parkin D, Whelan S, Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. 5. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(3):133–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vona-Davis L, Rose DP. The influence of socioeconomic disparities on breast cancer tumor biology and prognosis: a review. J Women’s Health. 2009;18(6):883–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porter P. “Westernizing” women’s risks? Breast cancer in lower-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(3):213–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howitt P, Darzi A, Yang GZ, Ashrafian H, Atun R, Barlow J, Blakemore A, Bull AM, Car J, Conteh L, Cooke GS, Ford N, Gregson SA, Kerr K, King D, Kulendran M, Malkin RA, Majeed A, Matlin S, Merrifield R, Penfold HA, Reid SD, Smith PC, Stevens MM, Templeton MR, Vincent C, Wilson E. Technologies for global health. Lancet. 2012;380(9840):507–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de la Fuente JR. The impact of globalization on mental health. Gac Med Mex. 2012;148(6):586–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eckersley R. Is modern Western culture a health hazard? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(2):252–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cui X, Dai Q, Tseng M, Shu XO, Gao YT, Zheng W. Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk in the shanghai breast cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(7):1443–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Craven KL, Hawks SR. Cultural and western influences on the nutrition transition in Thailand. Promot Educ. 2006;13(1):14–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chia KS, Reilly M, Tan CS, Lee J, Pawitan Y, Adami HO, Hall P, Mow B. Profound changes in breast cancer incidence may reflect changes into a Westernized lifestyle: a comparative population-based study in Singapore and Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2005;113(2):302–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woo KS, Chook P, Raitakari OT, McQuillan B, Feng JZ, Celermajer DS. Westernization of Chinese adults and increased subclinical atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(10):2487–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villarreal A, Hamilton ER. Rush to the border? Market liberalization and urban- and rural-origin internal migration in Mexico. Soc Sci Res. 2012;41(5):1275–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark SE, Hawkes C, Murphy SM, Hansen-Kuhn KA, Wallinga D. Exporting obesity: US farm and trade policy and the transformation of the Mexican consumer food environment. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2012;18(1):53–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohut A.: Global opinion of obama slips, international policies faulted pew research center global attitudes project 2012 http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2012/06/Pew-Global-Attitudes-U.S.-Image-Report-FINAL-June-13-2012.pdf.
  18. 18.
    McMichael AJ, Beaglehole R. The changing global context of public health. Lancet. 2000;356(9228):495–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martinez ME, et al. Comparative study of breast cancer in Mexican and Mexican-American women. Health. 2010;2(9):1040–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Currie C, Ahluwalia N, Godeau E, Gabhainn SN, Due P, Currie DB. Is obesity at individual and national level associated with lower age at menarche? Evidence from 34 countries in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(6):621–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    PASW Statistics 18.: 2009, IBM SPSS Inc: Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bentler PM.: EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual Multivariate Software, Inc. 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmitt T. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2011;29(4):304–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Hispanic Population.: 2010. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010 Census Brief. 2011 Institution Nov 2012. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-04.pdf.
  26. 26.
    Abundez C Resultados de Nutrición de la ENSANUT 2006 2007.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295(13):1549–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee SY, Poon WY, Bentler PM. A two-stage estimation of structural equation models with continuous and polytomous variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1995;48(Pt 2):339–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesse N. Nodora
    • 1
  • Scott C. Carvajal
    • 2
  • Rebeca Robles-Garcia
    • 3
  • Francisco Páez Agraz
    • 4
  • Adrian Daneri-Navarro
    • 5
  • Maria Mercedes Meza-Montenegro
    • 6
  • Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan
    • 7
  • Maria Elena Martinez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Moores UCSD Cancer CenterUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA
  2. 2.Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public HealthUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la FuenteCiudad de MexicoMexico
  4. 4.Focus Salud México S.C.Ciudad de MexicoMexico
  5. 5.Universidad de GuadalajaraGuadalajaraMexico
  6. 6.Instituto Tecnológico de SonoraCiudad ObregónMexico
  7. 7.Universidad de SonoraHermosilloMexico

Personalised recommendations