Abstract
Miscarriage is one of the most relevant adverse events in women’s reproductive life. The purpose of the study was to describe miscarriage trend in Italy during the last years among Italian and immigrant women, to compare miscarriage rates of the two groups and to evaluate the effect of age, nationality and educational level on the incidence of having a miscarriage. Then, a brief critical review of other miscarriage risk factors was performed. This study is based on ISTAT database. All data were analyzed through the statistical software SPSS and the following analytical techniques were used: multivariate logistic regression, factorial analysis of variance and Chi square test. Immigrant miscarriage rates resulted higher than Italian ones and they decreased from 2003 to 2009 unlike Italian ones, which remained unchanged. The effect of maternal age on the miscarriage incidence resulted different, depending on the nationality; for Italian women it increased with increasing of age and for immigrant women the opposite trend was found. Moreover, miscarriage incidence resulted significantly different depending on the maternal educational level. Whereas immigrant women considered did not belong to the same ethnic group, biological or genetic factors underlying these differences were excluded and a socioeconomic explanation was provided. Finally, in order to provide more complete information, other miscarriage risk factors were discussed through a brief review of the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(5):839–54.
Goddijn M, Leschot NJ. Genetic aspects of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14(5):855–65.
World Health Organization. Manual of the international statistical classification of diseases, injuries, and causes of death, ninth revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1977.
Jl Simpson. Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet. 1990;35(2):165–73.
Mishell DR. Recurrent abortion. J Reprod Med. 1993;38(4):250–9.
Fignon A, Hamamah S, Delaigue H, et al. Repeated spontaneous abortion: discussion on its etiologies. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1995;23(1):50–8.
Zinaman MJ, Clegg ED, Brown CC, et al. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 1996;65(3):503–9.
Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(4):189–94.
Osborn JF, Cattaruzza MS, Spinelli A. Risk of spontaneous abortion in Italy, 1978–1995, and the effect of maternal age, gravidity, marital status, and education. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(1):98–105.
van der Beerg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, et al. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(12):1951–9.
Lee RM, Silver RM. Recurrent pregnancy loss: summary and clinical recommendations. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):433–40.
ISTAT data. http://www.istat.it/it/.
Lauria L, Andreozzi S (Ed.). Percorso nascita e immigrazione in Italia: le indagini del 2009. Roma: Istituto Superiore di Sanità; 2011. (Rapporti ISTISAN 11/12). http://www.iss.it/publ/rapp/cont.php?id=2500&tipo=5&lang=1.
Yan J, Wu K, Tang R, et al. Effect of maternal age on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Sci China Life Sci. 2012;55(8):694–8.
Relazione del Ministro della Salute al Parlamento sullo stato di attuazione della legge contenente norme in materia di procreazione medicalmente assistita (legge 19 febbraio 2004, n. 40, articolo 15), Roma; 2011. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1568_allegato.pdf.
Norsker FN, Espenhain L, A Rogvi S, et al. Socioeconomic position and the risk of spontaneous abortion: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. BMJ Open 2012;2(3). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001077.
Kumar S. Occupational, environmental and lifestyle factors associated with spontaneous abortion. Reprod Sci. 2011;18(10):915–30.
Rasch V. Cigarette, alcohol, and caffeine consumption: risk factors for spontaneous abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(2):182–8.
Farioli A, Curti S, Violante FS, et al. Smoking and miscarriage risk. Epidemiology. 2010;21(6):918.
Blanco-Muñoz J, Torres-Sánchez L, López-Carrillo L. Exposure to maternal and paternal tobacco consumption and risk of spontaneous abortion. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(2):317–22.
Rapporto DOXA-ISS-OSSFAD sul fumo 2012. http://www.iss.it/binary/fumo/cont/Rapporto_annuale_sul_fumo_2012.pdf.
Windham GC, Fenster L, Swan SH. Moderate maternal and paternal alcohol consumption and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology. 1992;3(4):364–70.
Windham GC, Von Behren J, Fenster L, et al. Moderate maternal alcohol consumption and risk of spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology. 1997;8(5):509–14.
Parazzini F, Chatenoud L, Di Cintio E, et al. Coffee consumption and risk of hospitalized miscarriage before 12 weeks of gestation. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(8):2286–91.
Parazzini F, Bocciolone L, La Vecchia C, et al. Maternal and paternal moderate daily alcohol consumption and unexplained miscarriages. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(7):618–22.
Nelson DB, Grisso JA, Joffe MM, et al. Does stress influence early pregnancy loss? Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(4):223–9.
Neugebauer R, Kline J, Stein Z, et al. Association of stressful life events with chromosomally normal spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(6):588–96.
Fenster L, Schaefer C, Mathur A, et al. Psychologic stress in the workplace and spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(11):1176–83.
Ezra Y, Schenker JG. Abortion rate in assisted reproduction-true increase? Early Pregnancy. 1995;1(3):171–5.
Caserta D, Marci R, Tatone C, et al. IVF pregnancies: neonatal outcomes after the new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (law 40/2004). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(9):935–9.
Simon C, Landeras J, Zuzuarregui J, et al. Early pregnancy losses in in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(6):1061–5.
Wang JX, Norman RJ, Wilcox A. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among pregnancies produced by assisted reproductive technology. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(2):272–7.
Mantovani A, Stazi AV, Macri C, et al. Problems in testing and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals with regard to developmental toxicology. Chemosphere. 1999;39(8):1293–300.
Weselak M, Arbuckle TE, Walker MC, et al. The influence of the environment and other exogenous agents on spontaneous abortion risk. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2008;11(3–4):221–41.
Zheng YM, Wang Y, Zhao J, et al. Association between serum Bisphenol A and recurrent spontaneous abortion: a 1:2 case-control study, China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2012;33(8):841–5.
Liu YM, Shen YP, Liang H, et al. A correlative study on Bisphenol A and recurrent spontaneous abortion. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011;45(4):344–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present paper sought to suggest different promising interventions, which could decrease miscarriages rates in Italy, both in immigrant and in Italian women.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caserta, D., Ralli, E., Matteucci, E. et al. The Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Miscarriage Incidence Among Italian and Immigrant Women: A Critical Analysis from Italy. J Immigrant Minority Health 17, 843–851 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0005-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-014-0005-z