Participants
Participants were recruited for the HEY Man (Health Evaluation in Young Men) Study, a population-based, cross sectional survey of HIV infection, STIs including HBV, and associated risk behaviors in men aged 18 to 35 years residing in low income neighborhoods in five northern California counties.
Data Collection
The study design followed a protocol similar to the Northern California Young Women’s Survey. [13] In brief, men, age 18–35 years, were recruited within a low-income target area defined as U.S. Census block groups with median household income below the 10th percentile for five San Francisco Bay Area counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, San Joaquin and San Mateo. Because the 2000 U.S. Census data were not available at the time of planning the survey, median household income levels were obtained for the year 2002 using commercially available estimates (Claritas, San Diego, CA). Block group boundaries used the 1990 U.S. Census. We later verified that the target areas were not substantially changed after the 2000 U.S. Census data were made available. First, we examined how much the overall boundaries of the target area changed from 1990 to 2000. These boundaries made only minor changes to the total target area and did not include or omit any new neighborhoods. Second, we examined how many actually sampled city blocks fell outside the 2,000 target boundaries and found that none did. Within the target area, a simple random sample of city blocks was selected.
Field staff contacted all households within the sampled city blocks to identify eligible male residents. Residents were eligible if they spent the previous night in the household and had no other residence, and were 18 to 35 years of age. Of 17,295 households identified, 85.8% were successfully contacted (range 76.8% in Alameda to 96.6% in San Joaquin). Of 2,937 eligible men identified, 60.6% agreed to enroll in the study (range 53.3% in Alameda to 69.2% in Contra Costa).
Measures
Field staff administered structured interviews in Spanish or English based on the subject’s preference. Interviewers assessed demographic characteristics, sexual risk behaviors, substance use and access to medical care including prior HBV vaccinations. All men provided urine to test for gonococcal and chlamydial infection using nucleic acid amplification testing and serum for HBV core antibody (anti-HBc), syphilis testing using RPR and HIV ELISA. All serum specimens found to be positive for anti-HBc, were tested for HBsAg. Participants were considered to have past HBV infection if they tested positive with an isolated anti-HBc and to have chronic HBV infection if they tested positive for both anti-HBc and HBsAg.
Latino immigrants were defined as men who were born outside the U.S. and identified their ethnicity as “Latino or Hispanic.” Asian immigrants were defined as men who were born outside the U.S. and identified their ethnicity as “Asian or Pacific Islanders.” In the current report, we compare HBV risk related behaviors and HBV prevalence among Latino immigrant, Asian immigrant and US-born low-income men.
Analysis
Point prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to account for the 1-stage, cluster sample design. Probability weights were constructed using the relative probability of being included in the sample and were based on the sizes of the target populations by county (males aged 18–34 years with household median income below the 10th percentile) as estimated in the 1990 census. Statistical tests (Chi-square, Fisher’s exact) for comparisons among the three groups used two-sided P values. Because crude prevalence estimates in the sample differed from the survey-adjusted estimates, we present only weighted percentages. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess independent associations between prior HBV infection and predictor variables including demographic, access to medical care, and risk exposures and prior HBV infection using forward and backward stepwise selection methods. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 8.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
The study protocol was approved by the human subjects committees of the University of California San Francisco and the State of California Health and Welfare Agency. All interviewed men provided signed informed consent.