Recent Immigrants and the Use of Cervical Cancer Screening Test in Canada

  • Ehsan LatifEmail author
Original Paper


Using data from Canadian National Population Health Survey (1998–1999), this paper examined the factors that cause gap in Pap test utilization rate between recent immigrants and other Canadians. The Fairlie non linear decomposition analysis suggests that group differences in the mean values of the variables representing race, language, having regular physician, insurance ownership, and income level are the major factors behind the gap between other Canadians and recent immigrants. The results of the study also show that the Pap test utilization gap between other Canadians and recent immigrants narrows down over time though the process is quite slow.


Cervical cancer screening Canada 


  1. Blinder AS. Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural variables. J Hum Resour. 1973;8:436–55. doi: 10.2307/144855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan TB. From perceived surplus to perceived shortage: what happened to Canada’s physician workforce in the 1990s? Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Health Information; 2002. 978-897463-16-SBN 978-1-897463-16-1. Google Scholar
  3. Fairlie RW. An extension of the blinder-Oaxaca decomposition technique to logit and probit models. J Econ Soc Meas. 2005;30:305–16.Google Scholar
  4. Gandjour A, Lauterbach KW. Preventive care and the prospect of cost savings. Eur J Health Econ. 2006;3(1):1–2.Google Scholar
  5. Goel V. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the ontario health survey. Can J Public Health. 1994;85:125–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Harlan L, Bernstein A, Kessler L. Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why? Am J Public Health. 1991;81:885–91. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.81.7.885. II SSBNSBN.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Health Council of Canada. Why health care renewal matters: learning from canadians with chronic conditions. Toronto: Health Council. I; 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Katz SJ, Hoper TP. Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 1994;272(7):530–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.7.530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kenkel D. The demand for preventive care. Appl Econ. 1994;26(4):313–25. doi: 10.1080/00036849400000078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luke K. Cervical cancer screening; meeting the needs of minority ethnic women. Br J Cancer. 1996;74(supp):47–50.Google Scholar
  11. Maxwell C, Kozak J, Desjardins-Denault S, Parboosingh J. Factors important in promoting mammography screening among Canadian women. Can J Public Health. 1997;88(5):346–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mercer S, Goel V. Factors associated with mammography utilization: Results from the Ontario health survey, ICES Working Paper #22. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Nordin M, Hiebert R, Pietrek M, Alexander M, Crane M, Lewis S. Association of comorbidity and outcome in episodes of nonspecific low back pain in occupational populations. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(7):677–84. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200207000-00015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Oaxaca R. Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Intern Econ Rev. 1973;14:693–709. doi: 10.2307/2525981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Picone G, Sloan F, Taylor D Jr. Effects of risk and time preferences and expected longevity on demand for medical tests. J Risk Uncertain. 2004;28(1):39–53. doi: 10.1023/B:RISK.0000009435.11390.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Statistics Canada. The Canadian immigrant labour market in 2007: Analysis by region of postsecondary education. The immigrant labour force analysis Series (71-606-XWE2008004); 2008.Google Scholar
  17. Savage C. Provincial screening programs. Cancer Advocacy Coalition Canada Rep Card. 2005;8:17–20.Google Scholar
  18. Statistics Canada. Census of Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
  19. Statistics Canada. Census of Canada; 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Statistics Canada. National Population Health Survey; 1998–1999.Google Scholar
  21. Statistics Canada. How healthy are Canadians? Annual report; 2002.Google Scholar
  22. Statistics Canada. Canadian demographics at a glance. Catalogue No. 91-003-XWE; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Vikky Q, Phillips SP, Hopman WM. Determinants of healthy lifestyle and use of preventive screening. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:275. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Witt J. The effect of information in the utilization of preventive health- care strategies: an application to breast cancer. Health Econ. 2007;17(6):721–31. doi: 10.1002/hec.1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu S. Sickness and preventive medical behavior. J Health Econ. 2003;22(4):675–89. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00042-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zuberik R, Eisen G, Zuberik J, Teal C, Benjamin S, Glaser M, et al. Education improves colorectal cancer screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy in an inner city population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;95(2):509–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.t01-1-01776.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThompson Rivers UniversityKamloopsCanada

Personalised recommendations