Advertisement

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 68–73 | Cite as

Racial Sexual Mixing and Factors Associated with Condom Use Among Middle Eastern-Canadians

  • Nour Schoueri
  • Sandra L. BullockEmail author
  • Joel A. Dubin
Original Paper

Abstract

Background: Interracial relationships in Canada have increased over the years. However, little research has focused on comparing STI/HIV risk and condom use between those in intra- and interracial relationships, specifically among Middle Eastern-Canadians. Methods: A web-based survey was administered to Middle Eastern-Canadians. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with consistent condom use. Analyses were stratified by partner’s race (Middle Eastern or non-Middle Eastern). Results: The analysis sub-sample consisted of 92 participants. Factors associated with consistent condom use varied between the stratified groups. Among those with Middle Eastern partners, attitude towards marriage and the family and control in the relationship were associated with condom use. Among participants with non-Middle Eastern partners, acculturation and HIV knowledge were found to be associated with condom use. Discussion: Factors associated with condom use varied between Middle Eastern-Canadians in intra- and interracial relationships. These differences illustrate the need for tailored interventions aimed at increasing condom use among this racial group.

Keywords

Condoms Sexual behaviour Sexual risk Middle Easterners 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the University of Waterloo/Social Science and Humanities Research Council (UW/SSHRC) Institutional Grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Statistics Canada. Ethnic diversity survey: portrait of a multicultural society. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milan A, Hamm B. Mixed unions. Can Soc Trends. 2004;(73):2–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aral SO, Hughes JP, Stoner B, Whittington W, Handsfield HH, Anderson RM, et al. Sexual mixing patterns in the spread of gonococcal and chlamydial infections. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(6):825–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    PHAC. HIV and AIDS in Canada: surveillance report to June 30, 2006. Ottawa: Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division, Center for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC); 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Busulwa R, Takiyaddin MY, Azzubeidi AA, El Zein El Mousaad H, Tawillah J, et al. Perceptions of the condom as a method of HIV prevention in Yemen. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12(Suppl 2):S64–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chemtob D, Damelin B, Bessudo-Manor N, Hassman R, Amikam Y, et al. “Getting AIDS: not in my back yard.” Results from a national knowledge, attitudes and practices survey. Isr Med Assoc J. 2006;8(9):610–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kabbash IA, El-Sayed NM, Al-Nawawy AN, Shady IK, Abou Zeid MS. Condom use among males (15–49 years) in Lower Egypt: knowledge, attitudes and patterns of use. East Mediterr Health J. 2007;13(6):1405–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Todd CS, Barbera-Lainez Y, Doocy SC, Ahmadzai A, Delawar FM, et al. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus infection, risk behavior, and HIV knowledge among tuberculosis patients in Afghanistan. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(11):878–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans BA, Kell PD, Bond RA, MacRae KD. Racial origin, sexual lifestyle, and genital infection among women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic in London (1992). Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74(1):45–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26(5):250–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Educ Behav. 2000;27(5):539–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Statistics Canada. Low-income cut-offs for 2005 and low income measures for 2004. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loue S, Cooper M, Traore F, Fiedler J. Locus of control and HIV risk among a sample of Mexican and Puerto Rican women. J Immigr Health. 2004;6(4):155–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devos-Comby L, McCarthy D, Ferris H, Salovey P. Integrated theory of reasoned action predicts later condom use among low-income inner-city women. Presented at CIRA AIDS Science Day, Yale University; 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(7):439–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Takahashi M, Tanaka K, Miyaoka H. Reliability and validity of communication skills questionnaire (CSQ). Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60(2):211–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Leary A, Goodhart F, Jemmott LS, Boccher-Lattimore D. Predictors of safer sex on the college campus: a social cognitive theory analysis. J Am Coll Health. 1992;40(6):254–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sherman SG, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA. Power and attitudes in relationships (PAIR) among a sample of low-income, African-American women: implications for HIV/AIDS prevention. Sex Roles. 2000;42(3–4):283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Caron SL, Davis CM, Halteman WA, Stickle M. Predictors of condom-related behaviors among first-year college students. J Sex Res. 1993;30(3):252–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hojat M, Shapurian R, Foroughi D, Nayerahmadi H, Farzaneh M, Shafieyan M, et al. Gender differences in traditional attitudes toward marriage and the family. J Fam Issues. 2000;21(4):419–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sikkema KJ, Heckman TG, Kelly JA, Anderson ES, Winett RA, Solomon LJ, et al. HIV risk behaviors among women living in low-income, inner-city housing developments. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1123–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Delaney ME, Langille DB, Richardson HRL, Beazley RP. Factors influencing condom use among students attending high school in Nova Scotia. Can J Hum Sex. 1997;6(3):185–96.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    SAS Institute I. SAS user’s guide: statistics, version 9.1.3 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gordis L. Epidemiology: updated edition. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cooper TV, DeBon M, Haddock CK, Esquivel DR, Klesges RC, Lando H, et al. Demographics and risky lifestyle behaviors associated with willingness to risk sexually transmitted infection in Air Force recruits. Am J Health Promot. 2008;22(3):164–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Novak DP, Karlsson RB. Gender differed factors affecting male condom use. A population-based study of 18-year-old Swedish adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2005;17(4):379–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mmbaga EJ, Leyna GH, Mnyika KS, Klepp KI. Knowledge of sexually transmitted infections complications strongly predict risky sexual behaviours and HIV serostatus: results from rural Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(3):224–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Knipper E, Rhodes SD, Lindstrom K, Bloom FR, Leichliter JS, Montano J. Condom use among heterosexual immigrant Latino men in the southeastern United States. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007;19(5):436–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    James CA, Lima MD, Hart TA, Roberts KE, Ghai A. Demographic predictors of unprotected vaginal intercourse (UVI) in university students: the importance of religion. Poster presented at the 17th annual Canadian conference on HIV/AIDS research. Montreal, Canada; 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nour Schoueri
    • 1
  • Sandra L. Bullock
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joel A. Dubin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Studies & Gerontology, BMHUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science, and Health Studies & GerontologyUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations