Results from a Community-based Occupational Health Survey of Vietnamese-American Nail Salon Workers
A community-university collaborative partnership assessed self-reported work-related health effects and environmental factors in Boston’s Vietnamese immigrant community via an interviewer-assisted survey. Seventy-one nail technicians responded. Musculoskeletal disorders, skin problems, respiratory irritation and headaches were commonly reported as work-related, as were poor air quality, dusts and offensive odors. The reporting of a work-related respiratory symptom was significantly associated with the reporting of exposure factors such as poorer air quality. Absence of skin disorders was associated with glove use and musculoskeletal symptoms were associated with years worked as a nail technician. Work-related health effects may be common in nail salon work. Chemical and musculoskeletal hazards should be reduced through product and equipment redesign.
KeywordsImmigrant Occupational health Nail salon Vietnamese-American
- 1.Federman MN, Harrington DE, Krynski KJ. Vietnamese manicurists: displacing natives or finding new nails to polish? Ind Labor Relat Rev 2006;59(2):302–18.Google Scholar
- 2.Nails Magazine Nails fact book 2004–2005. Torrance: Nails Magazine; 2004.Google Scholar
- 3.Cosmetic Industry Review Expert Panel Amended final report on the safety assessment of ethyl methacrylate. Int J Toxicol 2002;21(Supp 1):63–79.Google Scholar
- 4.Methacrylate Producers Association. The methacrylate producers association’s position on use of methacrylic acid and unreacted methacrylate monomers liquid form in cosmetic products; 2002 http://www.mpausa.org/mpapos.htm.
- 5.Hazardous Substances Data Bank. Methyl methacrylate; hazardous substances databank number:195: Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2005: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB.
- 12.Froines JR, Garabrant DH. Quantitative evalutaion of manicurists exposure to methyl, ethyl and isobutyl methacrylates during production of synthetic fingernails. Appl Ind Hyg 1986;1(2):70–4.Google Scholar
- 21.Environmental Working Group. Skin deep: a safety assessment of ingredients in personal care products; 2004 http://www.ewg.org/reports/skindeep.
- 22.California safe cosmetics act of 2005; 2005 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=53453324010+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve.
- 25.SAS Institute I SAS statistical software. Cary, NC; 2001.Google Scholar
- 26.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National health and nutrition examination survey data: Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2004 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/rdq_c.pdf.
- 27.McDonald C, Checkoway H. Methodology: 18 study design. In: McDonald C, editor. Epidemiology of work related diseases. London: BMJ Books; 2000. p. 385.Google Scholar
- 28.National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system online prevalence data: Atlanta, GA; 2003.Google Scholar
- 29.NIOSH. Hazard controls: Controlling chemical hazards during the application of artificial fingernails: Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1999.Google Scholar
- 30.OPI Products. Material safety data sheet: Nail lacquer. 1996.Google Scholar
- 31.Nail Systems International. Material safety data sheet: NSI universal nail liquid; 2002.Google Scholar
- 32.Feeney M. Ventilation—methods for investigating odor complaints related to nail salons: Bureau of Environmental Health Assessment, MA Dept. of Public Health; 2002 http://www.state.ma.us/dph/beha/iaq/nails/nails.htm.