Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Employment Versus Home-Stay and the Happiness of Women in the South Caucasus

Journal of Happiness Studies volume 23, pages 4027–4071 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Modern women often face an uneasy choice: dedicating their time to reproductive household work or joining the workforce and spending time away from home and household duties. Both choices are associated with benefits, as well as non-trivial costs, and necessarily involve some trade-offs, influencing the general feeling of happiness women experience given their decision. The trade-offs are especially pronounced in traditional developing countries, where both the pressure for women to stay at home and the need to earn additional income are strong, making the choice even more controversial. To understand the implications of this choice on the happiness of women in these types of countries we compare housewives and working women of the South Caucasus region. The rich data collected annually by the Caucasus Research Resource Center allows us to match working women with their housewife counterparts and to compare the level of happiness across the two groups—separately for each country as well as for Armenian and Azerbaijani minorities residing in Georgia. We find a significant negative happiness gap for working women in Armenia and in Azerbaijan, but not in Georgia. The absence of such a gap among the Armenian and Azerbaijani minorities of Georgia indicates that the gap is mostly a country-rather than an ethnicity-specific effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Data Availability

Data and coding (in STATA) associated with the manuscript are available from the authors upon request.

Notes

  1. Unlike Armenia and Azerbaijan, Georgia is an ethnically diverse country: it is home to several ethnic minorities. The two largest minority groups are Armenians and Azerbaijanis. According to the 2014 Census, 5% of the Georgian population were ethnic Armenians and 6% were ethnic Azerbaijanis (GEOSTAT, 2016).

  2. All models are estimated using Stata 16. For detailed introductions to propensity score matching, see Smith (1997). For additional technical details about estimation, see Becker and Ichino (2002).

  3. For comparison, while more than 70 percent of Armenians and Azerbaijanis voted in national elections, the corresponding average participation in voting in EU countries was around 63 percent, and in the six post-Soviet countries included in our descriptive analysis (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Russian Federation, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan) was less than 60 percent. Authors’ calculations based on data collected by the Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA): https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout (retrieved on the 31st of January 2022).

Abbreviations

ATT:

Average treatment effects on the treated

CB:

Caucasus Barometer

CRRC:

Caucasus Research Resource Center

GDP:

Gross Domestic Product

EU:

European Union

FSU:

Former Soviet Union

ILO:

International Labor Organization

SC:

South Caucasus

USSR:

Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

USA:

United States of America

WDI:

World Development Indicators

WVS:

World Values Survey

References

  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Borrego, C., & Carrasco, R. (2017). Employment and the risk of domestic violence: Does the breadwinner’s gender matter? Applied Economics, 49(50), 5074–5091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., & Chernova, K. (2008). Absolute income, relative income, and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., & Tai, T.-O. (2016). Inequalities in unpaid work: A cross-national comparison. In M. L. Connerley & J. Wu (Eds.), Handbook on well-being of working women. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The stata journal, 2, 358–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beblo, M., & Beninger, D. (2017). Do husbands and wives pool their incomes? A couple experiment. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(3), 779–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behtoui, A. (2007). The distribution and return of social capital: Evidence from Sweden. European Societies, 9(3), 383–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winkler, A. (2006). The economics of women, men and work. Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnke, P. (2005). First European quality of life survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., & Ours, J. C. (2008). Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part-time work puzzle. Economic Journal, 118(526), F77–F99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., & Ours, J. C. (2009). Hours of work and gender identity: Does part-time work make the family happier? Economica, 76(301), 176–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M., & Cech, E. (2010). Cross-national beliefs about maternal employment. In J. Treas & S. Drobnič (Eds.), Dividing the domestic: Men, women, and housework in cross-national perspective (pp. 147–174). Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2005). The new gender essentialism: Domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes. British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 601–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, U., & Mani, S. (2015). Only mine or all ours: Do stronger entitlements affect altruistic choices in the household. World Development, 67, 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being research. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1973). Does money buy happiness? The Public Interest, 30, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. (2007). Women, work, and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(2–3), 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEOSTAT (2016). 2014 General Population Census. Main Results. Tbilisi: The National Statistics Office of Georgia. (GEOSTAT). http://census.ge/files/results/Census_release_ENG.pdf

  • Graham, C. (2005). The economics of happiness-insights on globalization from a novel approach. World Economics, 6(3), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guendouzi, J. (2006). ‘The guilt thing’: Balancing domestic and professional roles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 900–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg, A., & Stone, P. (2008). The media depiction of women who opt out. Gender & Society, 22(4), 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenze, J., & Klasen, S. (2017). Does women’s labor force participation reduce domestic violence? Evidence from Jordan. Feminist Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2016.1211305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Clarke, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2004). Unemployment alters the set-point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, E. F. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 963–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majlesi, K. (2016). Labor market opportunities and women’s decision making power within households. Journal of Development Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencarini, L., & Vignoli, D. (2018). Employed women and marital union stability: It helps when men help. Journal of Family Issues, 39(5), 1348–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzakis, E., & Moro, M. (2009). The poor, the rich and the happy: Exploring the link between income and subjective well-being. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C. W., & Kim, S.-W. (2008). The contented female worker: Still a paradox? Advances in Group Processes, 25, 117–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathawat, S., & Mathur, A. (1992). Marital adjustment and subjective well-being in Indian-educated housewives and working women. Journal of Psychology, 127(3), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomaguchi, K. M., Milkie, M. A., & Bianchi, S. (2005). Time strains and psychological well-being: Do dual-earner mothers and fathers differ? Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 756–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oduro, A., Deere, C., & Catanzarite, Z. (2015). Women’s wealth and intimate partner violence: Insights from Ecuador and Ghana. Feminist Economics, 21(2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, F., & Verashchagina, A. (2011). When does transition increase the gender wage gap? An application to Belarus. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 19(2), 333–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. J., & DeBoer, D. (2001). Changes in wives’ income: Effects on marital happiness, psychological well-being, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(2), 458–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., Rogers, S. J., & Amato, P. R. (2006). Wives’ employment and spouses’ marital happiness: Assessing the direction of influence using longitudinal couple data. Journal of Family Issues, 27(4), 506–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L. (1997). Matching with multiple controls to estimate treatment effects in observational studies. Sociological methodology, 27, 325–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. P., Minnotte, K. L., Mannon, S. E., & Kiger, G. (2007). Examining the “neglected side of the work-family interface": Antecedents of positive and negative family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Issues, 28(2), 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch-Römer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., van der Lippe, T., & Tai, T. C. (2011). The happy homemaker? Married women’s well-being in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 90(1), 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., & Widmer, E. (2000). Married women’s employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78(4), 1409–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lippe, T., & Peters, P. (2007). Competing claims in work and family life. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beja, E. (2012). Who is happier: The housewife or working wife? Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper.

  • Booth, A., & Van Ours, J. (2010). Part-time jobs: What women want?. Discussion Paper No. 4686.

  • Brodeur, A., & Connolly, M. (2012). Do higher childcare subsidies improve parental well-being? Evidence from Québec's family policies. IZA Discussion Paper Series 6804.

  • Center for Tolerance Under the Public Defender of Georgia. (2008). Ethnic groups in Georgia. Tbilisi: Center for Tolerance under the Public Defender of Georgia.

  • CRRC. (2022). In the Caucasus we count. Retrieved from Caucasus Research Resource Center: http://www.crrccenters.org/20119/Project-Overview.

  • CRRC Georgia. (2021). Future of Georgia—Survey report. Tbilisi: Caucasus Research Resource Centers.

  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and revolution at home. Penguin Books USA Inc.

  • Hori, M., & Kamo, Y. (2017). Gender differences in happiness: The effects of marriage, social roles, and social support in East Asia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13, 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9559-y

  • Inglehart, R. C.-M. (2014). World values survey: Round six—country-pooled datafile version: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Retrieved from www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp. Accessed on January 28, 2022.

  • International Labor Organization. (2022). ILOSTAT. Genève, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/. Accessed on January 29, 2022.

  • Khitarishvili, T. (2013). The economic crisis of 2008 and the added worker effect in transition countries. Working Paper 765.

  • Torosyan, K., Gerber, T. P., & Gonalons-Pons, P. (2015). Migration, household tasks, and gender: Evidence from the republic of Georgia. International Migration Review, 50(2), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12147

  • World Bank. (2011). World development report 2012:Gender equality and development. Washington D.C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

  • World Bank. (2021). World development indicators. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Accessed on January 29, 2022.

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International School of Economics at Tbilisi State University (ISET), Tbilisi, Georgia

    Karine Torosyan & Norberto Pignatti

  2. IZA - Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany

    Norberto Pignatti

  3. HCEO, Chicago, United States

    Norberto Pignatti

Authors
  1. Karine Torosyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norberto Pignatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the study conception, design, and implementation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karine Torosyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 14 Names and definition of variables used for matching
Full size table

14,

Table 15 Probability of being a working woman, Armenia
Full size table

15,

Table 16 Correlation matrix for explanatory variables, Armenia
Full size table

16,

Table 17 Probability of being a working woman, Azerbaijan
Full size table

17,

Table 18 Correlation matrix for explanatory variables, Azerbaijan
Full size table

18,

Table 19 Probability of being a working woman, Georgia
Full size table

19,

Table 20 Correlation matrix for explanatory variables, Georgia
Full size table

20,

Table 21 Probability of being a working woman, Georgian ethnicity in Georgia
Full size table

21,

Table 22 Correlation matrix for explanatory variables, Georgian ethnicity in Georgia
Full size table

22,

Table 23 Probability of being a working woman, Armenian ethnicity in Georgia
Full size table

23,

Table 24 Correlation matrix for explanatory variables, Armenian ethnicity in Georgia
Full size table

24,

Table 25 Probability of being a working woman, Azerbaijanian ethnicity in Georgia
Full size table

25 and

Table 26 Correlation matrix for explanatory variables, Azerbaijanian ethnicity in Georgia
Full size table

26.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torosyan, K., Pignatti, N. Employment Versus Home-Stay and the Happiness of Women in the South Caucasus. J Happiness Stud 23, 4027–4071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00590-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00590-7

Keywords

search

Navigation