Abstract
Women are often found to be in inferior jobs with lower wages and lower job quality, but to report higher job satisfaction. This gender-job satisfaction paradox is documented for high-income countries and is explained by gender inequality in job quality and expectations. In this paper we document this paradox for a developing country. We explore the complex relationship between gender, job quality and job satisfaction among agro-industry workers in Senegal, using primary data from a comprehensive worker survey. We use a multiple mediation model to disentangle direct and indirect pathways through which gender relates to job satisfaction. We find that women’s job satisfaction is higher, despite earning lower wages, receiving fewer nonwage benefits, being more in casual employment, and working fewer hours than men. Moreover, job satisfaction varies more strongly with gender than with worker education, wages or other job quality characteristics. We find that gender inequality in job quality mitigates the positive relationship between gender and job satisfaction, with wage and nonwage benefits as major mediating variables. Our findings imply opposing direct and indirect gender effects on job satisfaction, and bring some nuance in the debate on how reducing gender inequality in job quality may affect women’s job satisfaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We tested the model including squares of age, wage and hours; yet as none of the squared terms are statistically significant this is not reported.
References
Akay, A., & Martinsson, P. (2011). Does relative income matter for the very poor? Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. Economics Letters, 110(3), 213–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.046
Anh, N., Nguyen, N. M. T., Tuong Anh, N. T., & Nguyen, P. M. T. (2019). Job satisfaction in developing countries: an evidence from a matched employer–employee survey in Vietnam. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-04-2017-0096
Ayenew, H. Y., Estruch, E., Sauer, J., Abate-kassa, G., Schickramm, L., & Wobst, P. (2017). Decent rural employment and farm production efficiency : empirical evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 48, 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12359
Barrientos, S., Mayer, F., Pickles, J., & Posthuma, A. (2011). Decent work in global production networks: framing the policy debate. International Labour Review, 150(3–4), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00118.x
Bartram, D. (2021a). Age and life satisfaction: getting control variables under control. Sociology, 55(2), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520926871
Bartram, D. (2021b). Cross-sectional model-building for research on subjective well-being: gaining clarity on control variables. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02586-3
Bender, K. A., Donohue, S. M., & Heywood, J. S. (2005). Job satisfaction and gender segregation. Oxford Economic Papers, 57(3), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpi015
Bleys, B. (2012). Beyond GDP: classifying alternative measures for progress. Social Indicators Research, 109(3), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9906-6
Bóo, F. L., Lucia, M., & Pagés, C. (2010). Part-time work, gender and job satisfaction: evidence from a developing country. The Journal of Development Studies, 46(9), 1543–1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2010.492864
Brown, A., Charlwood, A., & Spencer, D. A. (2012). Not all that it might seem: why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor summary measure of job quality. Work, Employment and Society, 26(6), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012461837
Clark, A. E. (1996). Job satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1996.tb00648.x
Clark, A. E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4(4), 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(97)00010-9
Clark, A. E. (2018). Four decades of the economics of happiness: where next? Review of Income and Wealth, 64(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12369
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.1.95
Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to Whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02359.x
Clark, A., Oswald, A., & Warr, P. (1996). Is job satisfaction U-shaped in age? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00600.x
Dawson, C. (2017). The upside of pessimism − Biased beliefs and the paradox of the contented female worker. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 135, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.004
Dolan, C., & Sorby, K. (2003). Gender and employment in high-value agriculture industries. Agriculture & Rural Development Working Paper.
Dolan, C., & Sutherland, K. (2002). Gender and employment in the Kenya horticulture value chain. Globalisation and Poverty Discussion Paper.
Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all ? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.
Emran, S., & Shilpi, F. (2018). Agricultural productivity, hired labor, wages, and poverty: evidence from Bangladesh. World Development, 109, 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.009
Erro-Garcés, A., & Ferreira, S. (2019). Do better workplace environmental conditions improve job satisfaction? Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.138
Falco, P., Maloney, W. F., Rijkers, B., & Sarrias, M. (2015). Heterogeneity in subjective wellbeing: an application to occupational allocation in Africa. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 111(October), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.022
Gamero Burón, C., & Lassibille, G. (2016). Job Satisfaction among primary school personnel in Madagascar. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(11), 1628–1646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1187726
García-Mainar, I., & Montuenga-Gómez, V. M. (2020). Over-qualification and the dimensions of job satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 147(2), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02167-z
Graham, C., & Nikolova, M. (2015). Bentham or aristotle in the development process? An empirical investigation of capabilities and subjective well-being. World Development, 68(1), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.018
Green, C. P., Heywood, J. S., Kler, P., & Leeves, G. (2018). Paradox lost: the disappearing female job satisfaction premium. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(3), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12291
Herzberg, F. (1987). One more time: How do you motivate your employees. Harvard Business Review.
Hinks, T. (2009). Job satisfaction and employment equity in South Africa. Journal of African Economies, 19(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejp019
ILO. (2018). Global Wage Report 2018 / 19: What lies behind gender pay gaps. Geneva.
ILO. (2020). World employment and social outlook: trends 2020. International Labour Organization.
Izvercian, M., Potra, S., & Ivascu, L. (2016). Job Satisfaction variables: a grounded theory approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.093
Krumbiegel, K., Maertens, M., & Wollni, M. (2018). The role of fairtrade certification for wages and job satisfaction of plantation workers. World Development, 102, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.020
Kuegler, A. (2009). A Curse of Comparison? Evidence on Reference Groups for Relative Income Concerns. Policy Research Working Paper. The World Bank. (Vol. 4820).
Maertens, M., & Fabry, A. (2019). Creating More and Better Jobs in Global Value Chains.
Maertens, M., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2012). Gender and modern supply chains in developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 48(10), 1412–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.663902
Montero, R., & Rau, T. (2015). Part-time work, job satisfaction and well-being: evidence from a developing OECD Country. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(4), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.963567
Mulinge, M., & Mueller, C. W. (1998). Employee job satisfaction in developing countries: the case of Kenya. World Development, 26(12), 2181–2199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00089-8
Navarro, M., & Salverda, W. (2019). Earner position and job and life satisfaction: do contributions to the household income have the same effect by gender and occupations? Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(7), 2227–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0045-5
Nix, E., Gamberoni, E., & Heath, R. (2016). Bridging the gender gap: Identifying what is holding self-employed women back in ghana, rwanda, tanzania, and the republic of congo. World Bank Economic Review, 30(3), 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhv046
Perugini, C., & Vladisavljević, M. (2019). Gender inequality and the gender-job satisfaction paradox in Europe. Labour Economics, 60, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.06.006
Pita, C., & Torregrosa, R. J. (2021). The gender-job satisfaction paradox through time and countries. Applied Economics Letters, 28(12), 1000–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1792402
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rai, S. M., Brown, B. D., & Ruwanpura, K. N. (2019). SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – a gendered analysis. World Development, 113, 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.006
Razafindrakoto, M., & Roubaud, F. (2013). Job Satisfaction in Eight African Cities. In Urban Labor Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 109–133). doi: https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821397817_ch03
Sehnbruch, K., González, P., Apablaza, M., Méndez, R., & Arriagada, V. (2020). The quality of employment (QoE) in nine Latin American countries : a multidimensional perspective. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104738
Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and Capabilities. OUP Catalogue. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780195650389.html
Sloane, P. J., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings, and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00142
Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2003). Gender differences in job satisfaction in Great Britain, 1991–2000: Permanent or transitory? Applied Economics Letters, 10(11), 691–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485032000133264
Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2000). Well-being at work: a cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(6), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00085-8
Staelens, L., Desiere, S., Louche, C., & Haese, M. D. (2018). Predicting job satisfaction and workers’ intentions to leave at the bottom of the high value agricultural chain : evidence from the Ethiopian cut flower industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(9), 1609–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1253032
Stevenson, B. B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.
Van Aerden, K., Puig-Barrachina, V., Bosmans, K., & Vanroelen, C. (2016). How does employment quality relate to health and job satisfaction in Europe? A typological approach. Social Science and Medicine, 158, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.017
Van den Broeck, G., & Kilic, T. (2019). Dynamics of off-farm employment in Sub-Saharan Africa: a gender perspective. World Development, 119, 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.008
Van den Broeck, G., Van Hoyweghen, K., & Maertens, M. (2016). Employment conditions in the senegalese horticultural export industry: a worker perspective. Development Policy Review, 34(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12153
van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: a satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford University Press.
van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3
Vigan, F. A., & Giauque, D. (2018). Job satisfaction in African public administrations: a systematic review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(3), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316651693
Wen, X., Gu, L., & Wen, S. (2019). Job satisfaction and job engagement: empirical evidence from food safety regulators in Guangdong, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.089
Westover, J. H. (2012). The job satisfaction-gender paradox revisited. Journal of Global Responsibility, 3(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/20412561211260557
Funding
Funding was provided by Cgiar Research Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets (Grant number 2018X044.KUL).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Appendix 1: OLS regression results
Linear model 1 | Linear model 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unst. coef | St. coef | Unst. coef | St. coef | |
Women | 0.18** | 0.09** | 0.41*** | 0.21*** |
(0.12) | (0.06) | (0.12) | (0.05) | |
Job characteristics | ||||
Log (wage) | 0.65*** | 0.26*** | 0.47*** | 0.19*** |
(0.19) | (0.07) | (0.16) | (0.07) | |
Nonwage benefits | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.12*** | 0.14*** |
(0.06) | (0.06) | (0.05) | (0.05) | |
Employment status (Casual) | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
(0.16) | (0.07) | (0.14) | (0.07) | |
Working hours | 0.00 | 0.04 | −0.00 | −0.06 |
(0.01) | (0.06) | (0.01) | (0.06) | |
Demographic characteristics | ||||
Age | 0.15 | 0.02 | ||
(0.63) | (0.07) | |||
Married | 0.12 | 0.06 | ||
(0.11) | (0.05) | |||
Oulof | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
(0.09) | (0.04) | |||
Years of schooling | −0.03*** | −0.16*** | ||
(0.01) | (0.05) | |||
Total children | −0.09*** | −0.23*** | ||
(0.03) | (0.07) | |||
Health | 0.26*** | 0.41*** | ||
(0.03) | (0.04) |
1.2 Appendix 2: Results from single mediation models
Wage | Non-wage benefits | Employment status | Working hours | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unst. coef | St. coef | Unst. coef | St. coef | Unst. coef | St. coef | Unst. coef | St. coef | |
Women | 0.43*** | 0.21*** | 0.37*** | 0.18*** | 0.40*** | 0.20*** | 0.30*** | 0.15*** |
(0.11) | (0.05) | (0.11) | (0.05) | (0.11) | (0.06) | (0.11) | (0.05) | |
Job characteristics | ||||||||
Log (wage) | 0.51*** | 0.20*** | ||||||
(0.13) | (0.05) | |||||||
Nonwage benefits | 0.15*** | 0.17*** | ||||||
(0.05) | (0.05) | |||||||
Employment status (Casual) | −0.21* | −0.10* | ||||||
(0.11) | (0.06) | |||||||
Working hours | −0.01* | −0.10* | ||||||
(0.00) | (0.05) | |||||||
Demographic characteristics | ||||||||
Age | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 0.06 |
(0.61) | (0.07) | (0.61) | (0.07) | (0.62) | (0.07) | (0.62) | (0.07) | |
Married | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
(0.10) | (0.05) | (0.10) | (0.05) | (0.11) | (0.05) | (0.10) | (0.05) | |
Oulof | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
(0.09) | (0.04) | (0.09) | (0.05) | (0.09) | (0.05) | (0.09) | (0.05) | |
Years of schooling | −0.03*** | −0.14*** | −0.02** | −0.12** | −0.02** | −0.12** | −0.02** | −0.11** |
(0.01) | (0.05) | (0.01) | (0.05) | (0.01) | (0.05) | (0.01) | (0.05) | |
Total children | −0.09*** | −0.22*** | −0.09*** | −0.23*** | −0.09*** | −0.22*** | −0.10*** | −0.24*** |
(0.03) | (0.07) | (0.03) | (0.07) | (0.03) | (0.07) | (0.03) | (0.07) | |
Health | 0.25*** | 0.40*** | 0.27*** | 0.42*** | 0.26*** | 0.41*** | 0.27*** | 0.42*** |
(0.03) | (0.04) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.03) | (0.04) | (0.03) | (0.04) |
1.3 Appendix 3: OLS regression results with gender interaction terms
Baseline (Gender = 0: Men) | Interaction effect (Gender = 1: Women) | |
---|---|---|
Job characteristics | ||
Log (wage) | 0.40 | 0.06 |
(0.26) | (0.37) | |
Nonwage benefits | 0.07 | 0.13 |
(0.07) | (0.11) | |
Employment status (Casual) | −0.09 | 0.35 |
(0.21) | (0.31) | |
Working hours | −0.01 | 0.00 |
(0.01) | (0.01) | |
Demographic characteristics | ||
Age | −0.10 | 0.19 |
(1.03) | (1.40) | |
Married | 0.19 | −0.10 |
(0.16) | (0.23) | |
Oulof | −0.00 | 0.06 |
(0.13) | (0.20) | |
Years of schooling | −0.03** | 0.00 |
(0.01) | (0.02) | |
Total children | −0.09** | 0.01 |
(0.04) | (0.06) | |
Health | 0.23*** | 0.05 |
(0.05) | (0.07) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fabry, A., Van den Broeck, G. & Maertens, M. Gender Inequality and Job Satisfaction in Senegal: A Multiple Mediation Model. J Happiness Stud 23, 2291–2311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00498-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00498-2