Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regulatory Focus in Materialists and Its Consequences for Their Well-Being

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article concentrates on regulatory focus (promotion and prevention) as a factor involved in the relationships between materialism and well-being alongside two personality traits—emotionality and grandiose narcissism. In an empirical study two types of materialists—one with high emotionality and low narcissism, the other with high narcissism and low emotionality—were compared in relation to their regulatory orientation and well-being. Additionally, regression commonality analysis was utilised in order to explain the complex relationships between variables. Materialists, characterised by the high level of emotionality and low narcissism, appeared to be also more prevention-oriented and less promotion-oriented than the materialists, characterised by a high level of narcissism and a low level of emotionality. Among the five variables explaining well-being promotion focus connected with grandiose narcissism played the most important role. However in the case of the type of materialism associated with the high emotionality level and low narcissism the problem with well-being was due to the lack of promotion orientation, whereas in the case of the type of materialism associated with the low level of emotionality and high level of narcissism the promotion orientation connected with grandiose narcissism seemed to protect well-being. Materialism was related to well-being (negatively) only in the case of the first type of materialism and sustained its unique effect despite multicollinearity with other predictors. Generally materialism served as a variable which accentuated the role of promotion focus and grandiose narcissism in shaping well-being in both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study (MAT_REG_JoHS.sav) are available from openICPSR repository [https://doi.org/10.3886/E117505V1].

References

  • Anglim, J., & Grant, S. (2016). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: Incremental prediction from 30 facets over the Big 5. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of honesty–humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazińska, R., & Drat-Ruszczak, K. (2000). Struktura narcyzmu w polskiej adaptacji kwestionariusza NPI Raskina i Halla [The structure of narcissism in the Polish adaptation of Ruskin’s and Hall’s NPI questionnaire]. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6, 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, J. Z., Westerman, J. W., Bergman, S. M., & Daly, J. P. (2013). Narcissism, materialism, and environmental ethics in business students. Journal of Management Education, 38, 489–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldero, J. M., Higgins, E. T., & Hulbert, C. A. (2015). Self-regulatory and narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability: Common and discriminant relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (2015). The affect balance scale: Subjective approaches (3). In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life. International handbooks of quality-of-life (pp. 269–282). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In C. Sedikides & S. J. Spencer (Eds.), The self: Frontiers of social psychology (pp. 115–138). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, T. T. L., Gillebaart, M., Kroese, F., & DeRidder, D. (2014). Why are people with high self-control happier? The effect of trait self-control on happiness as mediated by regulatory focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisek, S. Z., Sedikides, C., Hart, C. M., Godwin, H. J., Benson, V., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Narcissism and consumer behavior: A review and preliminary findings. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H. (2008). Understanding the impact of consumer culture. In H. Dittmar, E. Halliwell, R. Banerjee, R. Gardarsdóttir, & J. Janković (Eds.), Consumer culture, identity and well-being. The search for the ‘good life’ and the ‘body perfect’ (pp. 1–24). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., & Kasser, T. (2014). The relationship between materialism and personal well–being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 879–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, G. E., Ksendzova, M., Howell, R. T., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2016). Buying to blunt negative feelings: Materialistic escape from the self. Review of General Psychology, 20(3), 272–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, K. M., & Griskevicius, V. (2016). Evolution and consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. (2008). Human. The science behind what makes us unique. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, C. A., Meriac, J. P., Overstreet, B. L., Apodaca, S., McIntyre, A. L., Park, P., & Godbey, J. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górnik-Durose, M. E. (2016). Polska adaptacja skali wartości materialnych (MVS) – właściwości psychometryczne wersji pełnej i wersji skróconych [A Polish adaptation of the Material Values Scale—Measurement properties of the full and short forms]. Psychologia Ekonomiczna, 9, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górnik-Durose, M. E. (2020). Materialism and well-being revisited: The impact of personality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górnik-Durose, M. E., & Pilch, I. (2016). The dual nature of materialism. How personality shapes materialistic value orientation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 57, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górnik-Durose, M. E., & Jach, Ł. (2020). Functionality of materialism—Cultural and evolutionary perspectives. The Review of Psychology, 63(2), 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world. Oxford: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., & Kenrick, D. T. (2013). Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanke, S., Rohmann, E., & Förster, J. (2019). Regulatory focus and regulatory mode—Keys to narcissists’ (lack of) life satisfaction? Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Cornwell, J. F. M. (2016). Securing foundations and advancing frontiers: Prevention and promotion effects on judgment and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudders, L., & Pandelaere, M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: The impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 411–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juczyński, Z. (2001). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia [Measurements in health promotion and health psychology]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, M., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. (2010). Materialism and its alternatives. In A. M. Zawadzka & M. Górnik-Durose (Eds.), Życie w konsumpcji, konsumpcja w życiu. Psychologiczne ścieżki współzależności [Life in consumption, consumption in life. Psychological paths of interdependence] (pp. 127–141). Sopot: GWP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: A psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Rosenblum, K. L., Sameroff, A. J., Deci, E. L., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., et al. (2014). Changes in materialism, changes in psychological well -being: Evidence from three longitudinal studies and an intervention experiment. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2003). Materialistic values: Their causes and consequences. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture. The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (pp. 11–28). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolańczyk, A., Bąk, W., & Roczniewska, M. (2013). Skala samoregulacji promocyjnej i prewencyjnej (SSPP) [Promotion and Prevention Self-Regulation Scale (PPSS)]. Psychologia Społeczna, 8, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, L. R., & Henson, R. K. (2012). Interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurman, J., & Hui, C. (2011). Promotion, prevention or both: regulatory focus and culture revisited. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Unit 5. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol5/iss3/3

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment, 25, 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Wiltshire, J., Bourdage, J. S., Visser, B. A., & Gallucci, A. (2013a). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty-Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., Gregg, A. P., & Park, S. H. (2013b). The person in the purchase: Narcissistic consumers prefer products that positively distinguish them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lens, I., Pandelaere, M., Shrum, L. J., & Lee, J. (2010). The role of regulatory focus in the endorsement of material values. In M. C. Campbell, J. Inman, & R. Pieters (Eds.), NA—Advances in consumer research (Vol. 37, pp. 457–458). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisjak, M., Molden, D. C., & Lee, A. Y. (2012). Primed interference: The cognitive and behavioral costs of an incongruity between chronic and primed motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 889–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manczak, E. M., Zapata-Gietl, C., & McAdams, D. P. (2014). Regulatory focus in the life story: Prevention and promotion as expressed in three layers of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Hoffman, B., Gaughan, E., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1012–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, T., & Pang, J. S. (2017). Extrinsic and intrinsic contingent self-esteem and materialism: A correlational and experimental investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 34(6), 610–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimon, K. (2010). Regression commonality analysis: Demonstration of an SPSS solution. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 36(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Y., Zhu, Y., Fan, W., Tan, Q., & Zhong, Y. (2015). People higher in self-control do not necessarily experience more happiness: Regulatory focus also affects subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, I., & Górnik-Durose, M. E. (2017). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, materialism, money attitudes, and consumption preferences. The Journal of Psychology, Interdisciplinary and Applied, 151, 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray-Mukherjee, J., Nimon, K., Mukherjee, S., Morris, D. W., Slotow, R., & Hamer, M. (2014). Using commonality analysis in multiple regressions: a tool to decompose regression effects in the face of multicollinearity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. (2004). The material values scale: A Re-inquiry into its measurement properties and the development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. (2017). Materialism pathways: The process that create and perpetuate materialism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 480–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2004). Terrifying thoughts, terrible materialism? Contemplations on the terror management account of materialism and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 219–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohmann, E., Hanke, S., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2019). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in relation to life satisfaction, self-esteem, and self-construal. Journal of Individual Differences, 40, 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P. (2002). The happy and unhappy faces of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P. (2007). Mediators of the association between narcissism and compulsive buying: The roles of materialism and impulse control. Psychology ofAddictive Behaviors, 21, 576–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P., Cisek, S., & Hart, C. M. (2007). The I that buys: Narcissists as consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), 254–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., Rudich, E. A., Gregg, A. P., Kumashiro, M., & Rusbult, C. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2006). It’s not just the amount that counts: Balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J., Wong, N., Arif, F., Chugani, S. K., Gunz, A., Lowrey, T. M., et al. (2013). Reconceptualizing materialism as identity goal pursuits: Functions, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1179–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2010). Peacocks, porsches, and thorstein veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatzel, M. (2002). ‘‘Money worlds” and well-being: An integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unanue, W., Dittmar, H., Vignoles, V. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2014). Materialism and well-being in the UK and Chile: Basic need satisfaction and basic need frustration as underlying psychological processes. European Journal of Personality, 28, 569–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, L. A. (2017). Foundational tests of the need-support model: A framework for bridging regulatory focus theory and self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(3), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The Psychological consequences of money. Science, 314, 1154–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth, L., & Foerster, J. (2007). How Regulatory focus influences consumer behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). The Symbolic power of money. Reminders of money alter social distress and physical pain. Psychological Science, 20, 700–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & O’Loughlin, R. E. (2009). Narcissism and well-being: A longitudinal perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 957–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author has no funding and support to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Grażyńskiego 53, 40-126, Katowice, Poland

    Małgorzata E. Górnik-Durose

Authors
  1. Małgorzata E. Górnik-Durose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata E. Górnik-Durose.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that no competing interests exist.

Ethical Standards

The research does not violate any Polish and international ethical standards.

Informed Consent

The participants were informed about the purpose of the study and the way the data were to be used. They agreed to participate in the research; hence their informed consent has been given.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Górnik-Durose, M.E. Regulatory Focus in Materialists and Its Consequences for Their Well-Being. J Happiness Stud 22, 2781–2801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00349-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00349-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation