The Subjective Well-Being of Those Vulnerable to Poverty in Switzerland

  • Jehane Simona-MoussaEmail author
Research Paper


This paper aims to examine the impact of being in a specific economic position, namely, being vulnerable to poverty, on people’s level of subjective well-being. Research usually focus on the top or at the bottom of the income distribution, but rarely on those in an in-between position. While the concept of poverty has been widely explored and analysed, people being vulnerable to poverty and who are struggling to maintain a certain standard of living are often neglected. This fact is probably due to the heterogeneous definition of those being vulnerable or the concept of vulnerability itself. Following the vulnerability to poverty approach, this paper estimates the effect of being in this adjacent position on the level of subjective well-being. The main hypothesis is that, people being vulnerable will report a lower level of subjective well-being compared to those in a secured position, but will be better off compared to those in poverty. Results do confirm our hypothesis, as the level of self-reported satisfaction with life is lower than the reference group for those being vulnerable to poverty, but not compared to those in poverty. However, the difference between the two groups is very small and tend to indicate similar subjective well-being. This result raise several questions and may translate how people being vulnerable to poverty feel left behind.


Subjective well-being Vulnerability Vulnerability to poverty Determinants 



  1. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (2014). Rising economic prosperity and social quality the case of new member states of the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 115, 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abraham, R. A., & Kavi Kumar, K. S. (2008). Multidimensional poverty and vulnerability. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(20), 77, 79–87.Google Scholar
  3. Alwang, J., Siegel, P. B., & Jorgensen, S. L. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines (Discussion Paper No. 0115). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Bah, A. (2013). Estimating vulnerability to poverty using panel data: Evidence from Indonesia (Working Paper No. 25). Clermont-Ferrand: Centre d’études et de recherches sur le développement international (CERDI).Google Scholar
  5. Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., & Hilhorst, D. (Eds.). (2004). Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  6. Bartram, D. (2012). Elements of a sociological contribution to happiness studies. Sociology Compass, 6(8), 644–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchflower, G. D., & Oswald, A. J. (2007). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Working Paper 12935. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).Google Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, G. D., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness a new view on the measure of performance. Academy of Management Working Paper Perspectives, 25(1), 6–22.Google Scholar
  9. Boarini, R., Comola, M., Smith, C., Manchin, R., & De Keulenaer, F. (2012). What makes for a better life? The determinants of subjective well-being in OECD countriesEvidence from the Gallup World Poll. OECD Publishing No. 2012/3.Google Scholar
  10. Bourguignon, F., Goh, C.-C., & Kim, D. I. (2004). Estimating individual vulnerability to poverty with pseudo-panel data (Working Paper No. 3375). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Bresson, M., Geronimi, V., & Pottier, N. (2013). La vulnérabilité: questions de recherche en sciences sociales. Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg.Google Scholar
  12. Brodiez- Dolino, A., Von Bueltzingsloewen, I., Eyraud, B., Laval, C., & Ravon, B. (2014). Vulnérabilités sanitaires et sociales. De l’histoire à la sociologie. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  13. Budowski, M., Tillman, R., Keim, W., & Amacker, M. (2010). Conceptualizing ‘precarious prosperity’: Empirical and theoretical elements for debate. International Journal for Comparative Sociology, 51(4), 268–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calvo, C., & Dercon, S. (2005). Measuring individual vulnerability (Discussion Paper No. 229). Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  15. Calvo, C., & Dercon S. (2007). Vulnerability to poverty (Working Paper No. 2007-03). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies.Google Scholar
  16. Cardona, O. D. (2003). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people (chapter 3). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  17. Cariolle, J., & Goujon, M. (2013). A retrospective economic vulnerability index 1990-2011- Using the 2012 UN-CDP definitions. Ferdi, Working Paper, I17. Google Scholar
  18. Castel, R. (1999). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: une chronique du salariat. Coll. Folio: éd. Gallimard.Google Scholar
  19. Chambers, R. (2006). Vulnerability, coping and policy (editorial introduction). IDS Bulletin, 37(4), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chaudhuri, S., Jalan, J., & Suryahadi, A. (2002). Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data: A methodology and estimates from Indonesia (Discussion Paper No. 0102-52). New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  21. Crettaz, E., & Suter, C. (2013). The impact of adaptive preferences on subjective indicators: An analysis of poverty indicators. Social Indicators Research, 114, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dercon, S. (2000). Income risk, coping strategies and safety nets (Working Paper No. 2000.26). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies.Google Scholar
  24. Dercon, S. (2001). Assessing vulnerability (Working Paper). Oxford: Centre for the Study of African Economies.Google Scholar
  25. Dercon, S. (2005). Vulnerability: A micro perspective (Working Paper No. 149). Oxford: Department of International Development.Google Scholar
  26. Dercon, S. (2006). La vulnérabilité: une perspective microéconomique. Revue d’économie du développement, 14(4), 79–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Diego-Rosell, P., Tortora, R., & Bird, J. (2016). International determinants of subjective well-being: Living in a subjectively material world. Journal of Happiness Studies.
  28. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diener, E., Napa Scollon, Ch., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dutta, I., Foster, J., & Mishra, A. (2011). On measuring vulnerability to poverty. Social Choice Welfare, 37, 743–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dwyer, A., Zoppou, C., Nielsen, O., Day, S., & Roberts, S. (2004). Quantifying social vulnerability: A methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards (Working Paper No. 14). Canberra: Geoscience Australia Record.Google Scholar
  33. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. David & R. W. Melvin (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Happiness of women and men in later life: Nature, determinants, and prospects. In M. J. Sirgy, D. Rahtz, & A. C. Samli (Eds.), Advances in Quality-of-Life theory and research (pp. 13–26). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Frey, S. B., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gesthuizen, M., & Scheepers, P. (2010). Economic vulnerability among low-educated Europeans. Acta Sociologica, 53(3), 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gonza, G., & Burger, A. (2017). Subjective well-being during the 2008 economic crisis: Identification of mediating and moderating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1763–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferris, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., & Peterson, M. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2017). World happiness report 2017. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  42. Holzmann, R. (2001). Risk and vulnerability: The forward looking role of social protection in a globalizing world. Paper prepared for “The Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty—Policy and Institutional Reforms for Poverty Reduction”, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
  43. Hoogeveen, J., Tesliuc, E., Vakis, R., & Dercon, S. (2005). Guide to the analysis of risk, vulnerability and vulnerable groups. Mimeo Social Protection Unit. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  44. Hübinger, W. (1996). Prekärer Wohlstand. Lambertus: Freiburg i. Br.Google Scholar
  45. Iglesias, K., Simona-Moussa, J., & Suter, C. (2015). Le bien-être subjectif en Suisse au début du 21e siècle: évolution et déterminants. Working Paper 4-2015/F. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel/MAPS.Google Scholar
  46. Jenkins, S. P., Brandolini, A., Micklewright, J., & Nolan, B. (Eds.). (2012). The great recession and the distribution of household income. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Jha, R., & Dang, T. (2009). Vulnerability to poverty in select Central Asian Countries. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 6(1), 17–50.Google Scholar
  48. Kamanou, G., & Morduch, J. (2002). Measuring vulnerability to poverty (Discussion Paper No. 2002/58). WIDER: United Nations University.Google Scholar
  49. Kristoffersen, I. (2018). Great expectations: Education and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 66, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kroll, C. (2011). Towards a sociology of happiness: Examining social capital and subjective well-being across subgroups of society. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences.Google Scholar
  51. Landau, K., Klasen, S., & Zucchini, W. (2012). Measuring vulnerability to poverty using long-term panel data (Working Paper No. 481). Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar
  52. Ligon, E., & Schechter, L. (2004). Evaluating different approaches to estimating vulnerability (Discussion Paper No. 0410). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  53. López-Calva, L. F., & Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2014). A vulnerability approach to the definition of the middle class. Journal of Economic Inequality, 12, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martin, C. (2013). Penser la vulnérabilité. Les apports de Robert Castel. Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 7(4), 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michalos, A. C. (1983). Satisfaction and happiness in a rural northern resource community. Social Indicators Research, 13, 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oesch, D., & Lipps, O. (2013). Does unemployment hurt less if there is more of it around? A panel analysis of life satisfaction in Germany and Switzerland. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 955–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paim, L. (1995). Definitions and measurments of well-being: A review of literature. Journal of Economic and Social Measurment, 21, 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pritchett, L., Suryahadi, A., & Sumarto, S. (2000). Quantifying vulnerability to poverty: A proposed measure, applied to Indonesia (Working Paper). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  59. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  60. SFOS. (2013). Regard sur la classe moyenne. Evolution des groups à revenus moyens de 1998 à 2009. Neuchâtel: Office Fédéral de la Statistique.Google Scholar
  61. Simona-Moussa, J., & Ravazzini, L. (2018). From one recession to another: Longitudinal impacts on the Quality of Life of vulnerable groups. Social Indicators Research.
  62. Strack, F., Argyle, M., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1991). Subjective well-being. An interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2010). Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. Social Research, 77(2), 679–714.Google Scholar
  64. Suter, C., & Iglesias, K. (2005). Relative deprivation and well-being. In H. P. Kriesi, et al. (Eds.), Contemporary Switzerland. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  65. Thomas, H. (2008). Vulnérabilité, fragilité, précarité, résilience, etc. Recueil Alexandries, Collections Esquisses. Retrieved from Reseau Terra.
  66. Tillman, R., Masia, M., & Budowski, M. (2016). Pauvreté, précarité, prospérité et bien-être en Suisse. In F. Ehrler, et al. (Eds.), Rapport Social 2016: Bien-être (pp. 166–184). Zürich: Seismo.Google Scholar
  67. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in 56 nations, 1946–1992. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(5), 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vieira Lima, S. (2011). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of the happiness gender gap. Working Paper. SCRIBD.Google Scholar
  70. Whelan, C. T., & Maître, B. (2007). Social class variation in risk: A comparative analysis of the dynamics of economic vulnerability (Working Paper No. 202). Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
  71. Whelan, C. T., & Maître, B. (2010). Protecting the vulnerable: poverty and social exclusion in Ireland as the economic crisis emerged (Working Papers 201023). Geary Institute: University College Dublin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations