Savoring and Dampening with Passion: How Passionate People Respond when Good Things Happen

Abstract

How do people react when they experience a positive event while pursuing a passionate activity? In this research, we conducted three studies to test if the extent to which people respond to positive events by engaging in savoring (i.e., attempting to maintain or enhance positive emotions) and dampening (i.e., attempting to down-regulated or stifle positive emotions) is predicted by levels of harmonious and obsessive passion for an activity. Study 1 (n = 321) and Study 2 (n = 547) both showed that harmonious passion positively predicted savoring, whereas obsessive passion predicted less savoring and greater dampening. Moreover, in Study 2, savoring mediated the relationships between both passion varieties and well-being outcomes. In Study 3, we extended these findings and tested if these relationships depended on whether a positive event was a result of an in-progress or completed achievement. Soccer fans (n = 394) imagined how they would react if their favorite team won either the semi-final (in-progress condition) or final (completed condition) of the ongoing UEFA champions league. In both scenarios, harmonious passion was a stronger predictor of savoring than obsessive passion. Obsessive passion also showed strong relationships with dampening in both scenarios, although this relationship was attenuated in the completed condition. Overall, these results reveal that passion varieties matter for predicting how people manage their good feelings following positive events, a finding that has implications for our understanding of the pathways that link passion varieties with well-being outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Studies 1 and 3, we used G*Power software to determine sufficient samples sizes to detect small to medium effect sizes with a minimum of .80 power (Study 1 targeted N = 314; Study 3 targeted N = 395). For Study 2, sample size was estimated using a web application (https://schoemanna.shinyapps.io/mc_power_med/) developed by Shoemann et al. (2017; Study 2 targeted N = 520). In each study, we recruited additional participants because we anticipated that some would need to be excluded due to dishonest responding.

  2. 2.

    Jose et al. (2012) refer to the two factors of the shortened WOSC as ‘amplifying savoring’ and ‘dampening savoring’. For consistency, we refer to them as ‘savoring’ and ‘dampening’.

  3. 3.

    In each study of this research, strong correlations were observed between HP and OP. Positive correlations between HP and OP are typical in the passion literature (see Marsh et al. 2013; Vallerand 2015), and the strength of these relationships can vary depending on the sample and activity domain (Marsh et al. 2013). To assess if these correlations introduced any potential problems related to multicollinearity, we calculated tolerance values for each study using the observed correlations between HP and OP (see Tables 1, 2, 4) and the formula: tolerance = 1 − R2; values less than .200 are typically interpreted as signally multicollinearity between predictor variables (Hutcheson and Sofroniou 1999). Tolerance values for Study 1, Study 2 (academic version), Study 2 (general version), and Study 3 were .534, .630, .908, and .592, respectively, which does not suggest that there are concerns due to multicollinearity in the analyses.

  4. 4.

    Of the 321 participants, 21 participants did not report a recent team victory. Therefore, analyses of savoring and dampening reactions to the team victory were conducted with a sample of 300 sports fans.

  5. 5.

    Correlations were compared in this research using the cocor software package (dependent groups, overlapping variables; Diedenhofen and Musch 2015).

  6. 6.

    Variance values were obtained from Mplus output, and reliability values were estimated using Cronbach’s alpha.

  7. 7.

    Bootstrapping was conducted using maximum likelihood estimation because it is unavailable with MLR estimation.

References

  1. Bryant, F. B. (2003). Savoring beliefs inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health,12, 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000103489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bryant, F. B., Chadwick, E. D., & Kluwe, K. (2011). Understanding the processes that regulate positive emotional experience: Unsolved problems and future directions for theory and research on savoring. International Journal of Wellbeing,1, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v1i1.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods,20, 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpentier, J., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2012). Ruminations and flow: Why do people with a more harmonious passion experience higher well-being? Journal of Happiness Studies,13, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9276-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curran, T., Hill, A. P., Appleton, P. R., Vallerand, R. J., & Standage, M. (2015). The psychology of passion: A meta-analytical review of a decade of research on intrapersonal outcomes. Motivation and Emotion,39, 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9503-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). Concor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS ONE,10, e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gentzler, A. L., Palmer, C. A., & Ramsey, M. A. (2016). Savoring with intent: Investigating types of and motives for responses to positive events. Journal of Happiness Studies,17, 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9625-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenaway, K. H., & Kalokerinos, E. K. (2017). Suppress for success? Exploring the contexts in which expressing positive emotion can have social costs. European Review of Social Psychology,28, 134–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1331874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion regulation: Past, present, and future. Cognition and Emotion,13, 551–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huebner, S. (2001). Manual for the Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction Scale. Columbia: University of South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hurley, D. B., & Kwon, P. (2013). Savoring helps most when you have little: Interaction between savoring the moment and uplifts on positive affect and satisfaction with life. Journal of Happiness Studies,14, 1261–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9377-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jose, P. E., Lim, B. T., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Does savoring increase happiness? A daily diary study. The Journal of Positive Psychology,7, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2012.671345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lafrenière, M. K., St-Louis, A. C., Vallerand, R. J., & Donahue, E. G. (2012). On the relation between performance and life satisfaction: The moderating role of passion. Self and Identity,11, 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.616000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mageau, G. A., Carpentier, J., & Vallerand, R. J. (2011). The role of self-esteem contingencies in the distinction between obsessive and harmonious passion. European Journal of Social Psychology,41, 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marsh, H. W., Vallerand, R. J., Lafrenière, M. K., Parker, P., Morin, A. J. S., Carbonneau, N., et al. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all? Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment,25, 796–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyamoto, Y., & Ma, X. (2011). Dampening or savoring positive emotions: A dialectical cultural script guides emotion regulation. Emotion,11, 1346–1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Neff, K. D. (2009). Self-compassion. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 561–573). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Philippe, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Andrianarisoa, J., & Brunel, P. (2009). Passion in referees: Examining their affective and cognitive experiences in sport situations. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,31, 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotional regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences,49, 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ritchie, T. D., & Bryant, F. B. (2012). Positive state mindfulness: A multidimensional model of mindfulness in relation to positive experience. International Journal of Wellbeing,2, 150–181. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v2.i3.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schall, M., Goetz, T., Martiny, S. E., & Hall, N. C. (2017). It ain’t over ‘til it’s over: The effect of task completion on the savoring of success. Motivation and Emotion,41, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9591-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schellenberg, B. J. I., & Bailis, D. S. (2016). The two roads of passionate goal pursuit: Links with appraisal, coping, and academic achievement. Anxiety Stress and Coping,29, 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2015.1036047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schellenberg, B. J. I., Bailis, D. S., & Mosewich, A. D. (2016). You have passion, but do you have self-compassion? Harmonious passion, obsessive passion, and responses to passion-related failure. Personality and Individual Differences,99, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schellenberg, B. J. I., Gaudreau, P., & Crocker, P. R. E. (2013). Passion and coping: Relationships with changes in burnout and goal attainment in collegiate volleyball players. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,35, 270–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining power and sample size for simple and complex mediation models. Social Psychological and Personality Science,8, 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. St-Louis, A. C., Verner-Filion, J., Bergeron, C. M., & Vallerand, R. J. (2018). Passion and mindfulness: Accessing adaptive self-processes. The Journal of Positive Psychology,13, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1245771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamir, M. (2009). Why do people want to feel and why? Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science,18, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01617.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The psychology of passion: A dualistic model. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vallerand, R. J. (2016). On the synergy between hedonia and eudaimonia: The role of passion. In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 191–204). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_13.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C. M., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., et al. (2003). Les passions de l’ame: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vallerand, R. J., Ntoumanis, N., Philippe, F. L., Lavigne, G. L., Carbonneau, N., Bonneville, A., et al. (2008). On passion and sports fans: A look at football. Journal of Sports Sciences,26, 1279–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802123185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vallerand, R. J., Paquet, Y., Philippe, F. L., & Charest, J. (2010). On the role of passion for work in burnout: A process model. Journal of Personality,78, 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00616.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vallerand, R. J., & St-Louis, A. C. (in press). The role of passion in integrated temporal positivity: Implications for optimal functioning. In F. Grouzet (Ed.), The handbook of psychology of time. New York: Oxford University Press.

  40. Verner-Filion, J., Lafrenière, M. A. K., & Vallerand, R. J. (2012). On the accuracy of affective forecasting: The moderating role of passion. Personality and Individual Differences,52, 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Verner-Filion, J., Schellenberg, B. J. I., Rapaport, M., Bélanger, J. J., & Vallerand, R. J. (2018). “The thrill of victory… and the agony of defeat”: Passion and emotional reactions to success and failure among recreational golfers. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,40, 280–283. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2017-0316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Williams, L. J., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2008). Measurement models for linking latent variables and indicators: A review of human resource management research using parcels. Human Resource Management Review,18, 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson, C. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2018). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence, resiliency, and mental health in older adults: the mediating role of savouring. Aging & Mental Health,22, 646–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1292207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85, 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada under Grant Number 756-2016-0132.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin J. I. Schellenberg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schellenberg, B.J.I., Gaudreau, P. Savoring and Dampening with Passion: How Passionate People Respond when Good Things Happen. J Happiness Stud 21, 921–941 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00114-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dampening
  • Dualistic model of passion
  • Emotion regulation
  • Harmonious passion
  • Obsessive passion
  • Savoring