The present study examined how the Growth Motivation Index (GMI; Bauer et al. in J Happiness Stud 16:185–210, 2015) related to well-being and identity exploration in samples from the U.S., Japan, Guatemala, and India. The GMI has two facets. GMI-reflective measures the motive to cultivate critical self-reflection and intellectual development, whereas GMI-experiential measures the motive to cultivate personally meaningful activities and relationships. We expected and found that, when comparing the two GMI facets simultaneously, GMI-reflective predicted well-being in countries ranked as having collectivist but not individualist cultures, whereas GMI-experiential predicted well-being in countries ranked as having individualist but not collectivist cultures. GMI-reflective predicted identity exploration across cultures. Implications for growth motivation and culture are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
As in past research (Bauer et al. 2015), where either reflective or experiential growth motivation would hold a bivariate correlation with an unpredicted variable (e.g., reflective growth motivation correlates with well-being in the U.S.), we expected that this correlation would no longer be significant when controlling for the other facet of growth motivation.
Women scored higher than men on GMI-experiential, identity exploration, PWB, PWB-growth, and PWB-purpose. However, there were no gender X GMI interactions, and gender did not account for the correlations reported above.
Still, GMI-reflective did correspond somewhat to PWB for participants who self-identified in lower castes. For the analyses that follow, we additionally conducted tests that excluded those in the lower castes, and the findings were very similar to the reported findings. Also, we excluded participants from India who did not identify with any caste, as we had no hypothesis for them and as their within-country findings suggested neither individualist nor collectivist patterns of growth motivation.
As in past research in the U.S. (Bauer et al. 2015), any bivariate relations between experiential growth motivation and identity exploration no longer held when controlling for reflective growth motivation. The two facets of growth motivation are not orthogonal, but controlling for one teases out the unique qualities of the other. Also, the measures of identity exploration and reflective growth motivation are similar: Both involve exploring new perspectives in life. But the two are not identical: They correlate at approximately the .50 level in past and present research, and identity exploration revolves around personal life decisions, whereas reflective growth motivation revolves around thinking about persons and life more generally.
Bauer, J. J. (2016). Eudaimonic growth: The development of the goods in personhood (or: cultivating a good life story). In J. Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being (pp. 147–174). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Bauer, J. J., Graham, L. E., Lauber, E. A., & Lynch, B. P. (in press). What growth sounds like: Redemption, self-improvement, and eudaimonic growth across different life events in relation to well-being. Journal of Personality.
Bauer, J. J., King, L. A., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Meaning-making, self-determination theory, and the question of wisdom in personality. Journal of Personality, 87, 82–101.
Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2004). Growth goals, maturity, and well-being. Developmental Psychology,40, 114–127.
Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2010). Eudaimonic growth: Narrative growth goals predict increases in ego development and subjective well-being three years later. Developmental Psychology,46, 761–772.
Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2008). Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,9, 81–104.
Bauer, J. J., McAdams, D. P., & Sakaeda, A. R. (2005). Interpreting the good life: Growth memories in the lives of mature, happy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,88, 203–217.
Bauer, J. J., Park, S. W., Montoya, R. M., & Wayment, H. A. (2015). Growth motivation toward two paths of eudaimonic self-development. Journal of Happiness Studies,16, 185–210.
Bell, L. G., Bell, D. C., & Nakata, Y. (2000). Triangulation and adolescent development in the U.S. and Japan. Family Process,40, 173–186.
Berzonsky, M. D. (1989). Identity style: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Adolescent Research,4, 268–282.
Brown, C. M., Park, S. W., & Folger, S. F. (2012). Growth motivation as a moderator of behavioral self-handicapping in women. The Journal of Social Psychology,152, 136–146.
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., et al. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216–236.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–108). New York: Oxford University.
Devine, J., Camfield, L., & Gough, I. (2008). Autonomy or dependence—Or both? Perspectives from Bangladesh. Journal of Happiness Studies,9, 105–138.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffen, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49, 71–75.
Diener, E., Gohm, C., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,31, 419–436.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist,61, 305–314.
Erikson, E. H. (1968/1994). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
Gaertner, L., Sedikedes, C., & Cai, H. (2012). Wanting to be great and better but not average: On the pancultural desire for self-enhancing and self-improving feedback. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,43, 521–526.
Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., Grime, R. L., & Snarey, J. R. (2007). Moral judgment development across cultures: Revisiting Kohlberg’s universality claims. Developmental Review,27, 443–500.
Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. New York: Oxford University.
Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. (2011). Personality: The universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology,60, 369–394.
Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81, 599–615.
Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 1268–1283.
Heine, S. J., Takata, T., & Lehman, D. R. (2000). Beyond self-presentation: Evidence for self-criticism among Japanese. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,26, 71–78.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Jaspal, R. (2011). Caste, social stigma, and identity processes. Psychology and Developing Societies,23, 27–62.
Jha, S. D., & Singh, K. (2011). An analysis of individualism-collectivism across northern India. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology,37, 149–156.
Kashima, E. S., Hardie, E. A., Wakimoto, R., & Kashima, Y. (2011). Culture- and gender-specific implications of relational and collective contexts on spontaneous self-descriptions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,42, 740–758.
Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S.-C., Gelfand, M., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69, 925–937.
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Well-being correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22, 281–288.
Keller, H. (2012). Cross-cultural psychology: Taking people, contexts, and situations seriously. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 116–131). New York: Oxford University.
King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2007). Whatever happened to “what might have been”? Regrets, happiness, and maturity. American Psychologist,62, 625–636.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 1245–1267.
Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: Affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science,12, 201–206.
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Martela, F., Ryan, R. M., & Steger, M. F. (2018). Meaningfulness as satisfaction of autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: Comparing the four satisfactions and positive affect as predictors of meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies,19, 1261–1282.
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., Fontaine, J., Anguas-Wong, A. M., Ariola, M., Ataca, B., et al. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,39, 55–74.
Nayar, K. R. (2007). Social exclusion, caste, and health: A review based on the social determinants framework. Indian Journal of Medical Research,126, 355–363.
O’Mara, E. M., Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Zhou, X., & Liu, Y. (2012). A longitudinal-experimental test of panculturality of self-enhancement: Self-enhancement promotes psychological well-being both in the west and the east. Journal of Research in Personality,46, 157–163.
Oppenheim-Weller, S., Roccas, S., & Kurman, J. (2018). Subjective value fulfillment: A new way to study personal values and their consequences. Journal of Research in Personality,76, 38–49.
Park, S., Bauer, J. J., & Arbuckle, N. B. (2009). Growth motivation attenuates the self-serving attribution. Journal of Research in Personality,43, 914–917.
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp. 703–732). New York: Wiley.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69, 719–727.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,103, 663–688.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor.
Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2004). Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,35, 209–233.
Sinha, J. B. P., Sinha, T. N., Verma, J., & Sinha, R. B. N. (2001). Collectivism coexisting with individualism: An Indian scenario. Asian Journal of Social Psychology,4, 133–145.
Sortheix, F. M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Values that underlie and undermine well-being: Variability across countries. European Journal of Personality,31, 187–201.
Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology,62, 215–241.
Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P. E., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Tiberius, V. (2014). How theories of well-being can help us help. Journal of Practical Ethics,2, 1–19.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review,96, 506–520.
Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74, 118–128.
Voronov, M., & Singer, J. A. (2002). The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review. The Journal of Social Psychology,142, 461–480.
Wayment, H. A., & Bauer, J. J. (2018). The quiet ego: Motives for self-other balance and growth in relation to well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 881–896.
Wirtz, D., Chiu, C.-Y., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2009). What constitutes a good life? Cultural differences in the role of positive and negative affect in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality,77, 1167–1195.
Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in life and why it matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
We wish to thank Matt Montoya, Erin O’Mara, Elissa Lauber, Julie Prosser, and Carrie Underwood of the University of Dayton and Claudia DeLeon of Instituto Central America for their help with this project.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bauer, J.J., Park, S.W., Kamide, H. et al. Growth Motivation and Well-Being in the U.S., Japan, Guatemala, and India. J Happiness Stud 21, 899–919 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00099-6
- Growth motivation
- Identity exploration
- Eudaimonic growth