Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corruption Takes Away Happiness: Evidence from a Cross-National Study

Journal of Happiness Studies volume 21, pages 485–504 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Both corruption and subjective well-being are of concern to academics, governments, and policy makers. This paper studies the impact of corruption on subjective well-being, using cross-national data for 126 countries. By employing preindustrial local traditional democracy level as a novel instrument variable for current corruption, the paper addresses the endogeneity issue. We find the national average of subjective well-being would decrease by 0.23 points if a government became more corrupt by 10 points, and unemployment rate had to decrease equivalently by 9.2% to keep the national average subjective well-being unchanged. Further investigation shows that corruption had a significant effect in democratic or high-income countries only. The results are robust to alternative measures of corruption and happiness, estimation strategies, and excluding outliers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. In following Ott (2010a), life satisfaction, happiness, subjective well-being, and quality of life are used interchangeably in this paper. The dominant view is that both subjective well-being and happiness are umbrella terms (e.g., Diener 2006; The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group 1995). Happiness is normally defined as a positive affect but can also be thought of as a universal evaluation of a person’s life satisfaction (Camfield and Skevington 2008). Life satisfaction is thus a subordinate term to the general concept of happiness. However, it should be noted that Ott (2011) provided discussions on differences between happiness and subjective well-being.

  2. In addition, a growing body of literature focuses on the effect of the general quality of government on happiness. For example, Bjørnskov, Dreher, and Fischer (2010), Samanni and Holmberg (2010), Teorell (2009), and Kim and Kim (2012) provided comprehensive literature reviews.

  3. Specifically, Arvin and Lew (2014) used a 10-year lag of freedom, house and population growth, share of exports made up of resource products, great circle distance from a country’s principal city to the equator, and the legal origin of a country’s judicial system (British, French, or socialist) as IVs for corruption. Apparently, some of its IVs, such as share of exports, have a direct effect on happiness, which violates the exclusion criteria for a valid IV. Sulemana (2015) used democracy as an IV for corruption, which also violates the exclusion criteria because democracy has been shown to have a direct impact on happiness (Inglehart 1999).

  4. PM2.5 is fine particulate matter in micrograms per cubic meter that is 2.5 microns and smaller, ug/m3, which can lodge deep in lung and blood tissue and is injurious to health.

  5. Religious fractionalization reflects the probability that two randomly selected people from a given country will not belong to the same religious group. The higher the number, the more fractionalized the society.

  6. Ethnic fractionalization reflects the probability that two randomly selected people from a given country will belong to different ethnic groups. The variable thus ranges from 0 (perfectly homogeneous) to 1 (highly fragmented).

  7. Language fractionalization reflects the probability that two randomly selected people from a given country will not belong to the same linguistic group. The higher the number, the more fractionalized the society.

  8. We would see that the difference between 2SLS and OLS estimators is significant when using the BCI as a robustness check for measurement of corruption.

  9. TI adopted a scale of 0–10 before 2013 for its CPI and then switched to a scale of 0–100 in 2014.

  10. Standard deviation is the most commonly used set of statistics for measuring inequality of happiness within a nation (Kalmijn and Veenhoven 2005). Other measures include absolute difference, the mean pair distance, the interquartile range, and inequality-adjusted happiness (Kalmijn and Veenhoven). For simplicity, this paper only reports results using standard deviation as a measure of inequality of happiness.

  11. Happy life expectancy = life expectancy at birth times happiness (0–1 point scale).

  12. We owe this observation to an anonymous referee.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review,91(5), 1369–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akay, A., Constant, A., Giulietti, C., & Guzi, M. (2017). Ethnic diversity and well-being. Journal of Population Economics,30(1), 265–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G., & Shiller, R. (2010). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics,88(9–10), 2009–2042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics,85(2), 207–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altindag, D. T., & Xu, J. (2017). Life satisfaction and preferences over economic growth and institutional quality. Journal of Labor Research,38(1), 100–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvin, M., & Lew, B. (2014). Does income matter in the happiness-corruption relationship? Journal of Economic Studies,41(3), 469–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, D. (2015). Asymptotic bias of OLS in the presence of reverse causality (No. 179). Economics Department Working Paper Series. Retrieved June 13, 2018, from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/econ_workingpaper/179.

  • Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. Wiley series in probability and statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., & Fischer, J. A. V. (2010). Formal institutions and subjective well-being: Revisiting the cross-country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy,26(4), 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013). A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies,46(12), 1523–1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Yuan, H. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies,10(4), 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brülde, B. (2010). Happiness, morality, and politics. Journal of Happiness Studies,11(5), 567–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & Skevington, S. M. (2008). On subjective well-being and quality of life. Journal of Health Psychology,13(6), 764–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggburn, J. D., & Schneider, S. K. (2003). The relationship between state government performance and state quality of life. International Journal of Public Administration,26(12), 1337–1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review,91(1), 335–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicator of subjective well-being and Ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies,7(4), 397–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal,110(466), 918–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature,40(2), 402–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). The transmission of democracy: From the village to the nation-state. American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings,103(3), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2018). Ancestral characteristics of modern populations. Economic History of Developing Regions,33(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L., & Saks, R. E. (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics,90(6–7), 1053–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonza, G., & Burger, A. (2017). Subjective well-being during the 2008 economic crisis: Identification of mediating and moderating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies,18(6), 1763–1797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., & Compen, B. (2015). Economic freedom and life satisfaction: Mediation by income per capita and generalized trust. Journal of Happiness Studies,16(3), 789–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., & Lous, B. (2018). Economic freedom, income inequality and life satisfaction in OECD countries. Journal of Happiness Studies,19(7), 2071–2093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2011). Adaptation amidst prosperity and adversity: Insights from happiness studies from around the World. World Bank Research Observer,26(1), 105–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Growiec, K., & Growiec, J. (2014). Trusting only whom you know, knowing only whom you trust: The joint impact of social capital and trust on happiness in CEE countries. Journal of Happiness Studies,15(5), 1015–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., de Mello, L., & Sharan, R. (2001). Corruption and military spending. European Journal of Political Economy,17(4), 749–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2017). World happiness report 2017. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Retrieved June 19, 2018, from http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2017/.

  • Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling,20(2), 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science,38(04), 595–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen, F., & Heylighen, F. (2000). Global progress II: Evolutionary mechanisms and their side-effects. Journal of Happiness Studies,1(3), 351–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, T. (2012). Fractionalization and well-being: Evidence from a new South African data set. New Zealand Economic Papers,46(3), 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommerich, C., & Tiefenbach, T. (2018). Analyzing the relationship between social capital and subjective well-being: The mediating role of social affiliation. Journal of Happiness Studies,19(4), 1091–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1999). Trust, well-being and democracy. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2005). Measuring inequality of happiness in nations: In search for proper statistics. Journal of Happiness Studies,6(4), 357–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2012). Does government make people happy? Exploring new research directions for government’s roles in happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies,13(5), 875–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2003). How corruption affects productivity. Kyklos,56(4), 457–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • León, C. J., Araña, J. E., & de León, J. (2013). Valuing the social cost of corruption using subjective well being data and the technique of vignettes. Applied Economics,45(27), 3863–3870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., An, L., Xu, J., & Baliamoune-Lutz, M. (2018). Corruption costs lives: Evidence from a cross-country study. The European Journal of Health Economics,19(1), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-H. A., Lahiri, S., & Hsu, C.-P. (2017). Happiness and globalization: A spatial econometric approach. Journal of Happiness Studies,18(6), 1841–1857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,110(3), 681–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics,69(2), 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics,29(1), 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic development. Journal of Development Economics,76(2), 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjee, R., & Beron, K. (2005). Gender, religion and happiness. The Journal of Socio-Economics,34(5), 674–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas (Vol. 159). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of Mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review,101(7), 3221–3252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science,22(9), 1095–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal,107, 1815–1831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. (2010a). Good governance and happiness in nations: Technical quality precedes democracy and quality beats size. Journal of Happiness Studies,11(3), 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. (2010b). Greater happiness for a greater number: Some non-controversial options for governments. Journal of Happiness Studies,11(5), 631–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. (2011). Limited experienced happiness or unlimited expected utility, what about the differences? Journal of Happiness Studies,12(3), 519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher, S., Hauser, C., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2015). The impact of social capital on subjective well-being: a regional perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies,16(5), 1231–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies,30(2), 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. (2010). Social capital and happiness: Additional cross-country evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies,11(4), 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rode, M. (2013). Do good institutions make citizens happy, or do happy citizens build better institutions? Journal of Happiness Studies,14(5), 1479–1505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2010). Corruption, happiness, social trust and the welfare state: A causal mechanisms approach (No. QoG Working Paper Series 2010:9). QoG Working Paper Series. Retrieved June 18, 2018, from https://core.ac.uk/display/43558983.

  • Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating Social Capital. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. NBER Working Papers Series.

  • Samanni, M., & Holmberg, S. (2010). Quality of government makes people happy. QoG Working Paper Series 2010:1. Retrieved June 13, 2018, from http://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350150_2010_1_samanni_holmberg.pdf.

  • Schröder, M. (2018). Income inequality and life satisfaction: Unrelated between countries, associated within countries over time. Journal of Happiness Studies,19(4), 1021–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,108(3), 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruk, R., & KeÅ¡eljević, A. (2016). Institutional origins of subjective well-being: Estimating the effects of economic freedom on national happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies,17(2), 659–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standaert, S. (2015). Divining the level of corruption: A Bayesian state-space approach. Journal of Comparative Economics,43(3), 782–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulemana, I. (2015). Do perceptions about public corruption influence subjective well-being? Evidence from Africa. Subjective well-being: Psychological predictors, social influences and economical aspects. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulemana, I., Iddrisu, A. M., & Kyoore, J. E. (2017). A micro-level study of the relationship between experienced corruption and subjective wellbeing in Africa. Journal of Development Studies,53(1), 138–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, M. (2008). Representation, corruption, and subjective well-being. Comparative Political Studies,41(12), 1607–1630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavor, T., Gonen, L. D., Weber, M., & Spiegel, U. (2018). The effects of income levels and income inequalities on happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies,19(7), 2115–2137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L., Herian, M. N., & Diener, E. (2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being: Whether, how, and when. Social Psychological and Personality Science,5(7), 751–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J. (2009). The impact of quality of government as impartiality: Theory and evidence. 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science. Retrieved June 13, 2018, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1449173.

  • Teorell, J., Charron, N., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Sundin, P., et al. (2017). The Qog standard dataset. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine,41(10), 1403–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy. Social Indicators Research,39(1), 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number: Is that possible and desirable? Journal of Happiness Studies,11(5), 605–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Wong, M. C. S. (2014). Happiness and leisure across countries: Evidence from international survey data. Journal of Happiness Studies,15(1), 85–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsch, H. (2008). The welfare costs of corruption. Applied Economics,40(14), 1839–1849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Zhu, J. (2016). When are people unhappy? Corruption experience, environment, and life satisfaction in Mainland China. Journal of Happiness Studies,17(3), 1125–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Zhang, X., & Chen, X. (2017a). Happiness in the air: How does a dirty sky affect mental health and subjective well-being? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,85, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Zhang, X., & Chen, X. (2017b). Valuing air quality using happiness data: The case of China. Ecological Economics,137, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Social Science Foundation (15AZD079) and Humanities and Social Sciences Project from the Ministry of Education of China (15XJC790012). We would like to thank Gordon Liu, and Qinying He for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Public Administration School, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China

    Qiang Li

  2. School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan, China

    Lian An

  3. Coggin College of Business, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, USA

    Lian An

Authors
  1. Qiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lian An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 9.

Table 9 First stage correlations between preindustrial democracy and current corruption
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., An, L. Corruption Takes Away Happiness: Evidence from a Cross-National Study. J Happiness Stud 21, 485–504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00092-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00092-z

Keywords

search

Navigation