Buffering Effects for Negative Life Events: The Role of Material, Social, Religious and Personal Resources

Abstract

The changes in subjective wellbeing experienced following negative life events can be buffered by various types of resources. In the present article, we compare the influences of material, religious, social and personality resources using the Swiss Household Panel in a unified framework. Fixed effects regression models are estimated for four negative life events: separation, death of a closely related person, unemployment and disability. Buffering effects are estimated by interacting time since the event with the amount of resources. Religious resources show the strongest buffering whereas material resources do not seem to buffer consequences of negative life events. Social and personality resources present mixed results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Source: SHP 1999–2016

Fig. 2

Source: SHP 1999–2016

Fig. 3

Source: SHP 1999–2016

Fig. 4

Source: SHP 1999–2016

Notes

  1. 1.

    As commonly seen in the literature (see e.g. Diener et al. 2003) we use happiness, life satisfaction and SWB interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    Martikainen and Valkonen (1998) studied the mortality of widows after experiencing bereavement and found no clear buffering effect of income.

  3. 3.

    Some studies have covered non-discrete events. Lechner et al. (2013) found that both religious attendance and subjective religiosity buffered the impact of work-related demands on depressive symptoms but not on life satisfaction or work satisfaction.

  4. 4.

    For social support and stressors, see e.g. Cummins (1990) for job stressors, Laudet et al. (2006) for drug addiction, Mueller (2006) for couple difficulties.

  5. 5.

    Among personality traits, extraversion and neuroticism are usually found to predict happiness best.

  6. 6.

    There has been a change in the questionnaire. The yearly questions on relatives (available from 1999 to 2010) has been replaced by separate questions for children, father, mother, siblings and other relatives every 3 years (in 2013 and 2016). This is why we selected friends as indicators. However, using an alternative measure for the entire network gives similar empirical results. The change in the questionnaire concerns also the measure of emotional support (see online Appendix).

  7. 7.

    If there are multiple events, the buffer variable may vary between events.

  8. 8.

    In case of multiple events, we exclude some observations between two events. This concerns observations that are 1 or 2 years after an event and, at the same time, 1 year before the next event.

  9. 9.

    Although conceptually internal, personality includes in addition to an internal component (intra-individual components, i.e. openness, conscientiousness and neuroticism) a rather external component (interindividual components, i.e. agreeableness and extraversion).

  10. 10.

    The buffering variables are stable for each event. In cases with multiple events per individual, the buffer variables might change over time for the same individual. These models include not only an interaction, but also a main effect for the buffering variable.

  11. 11.

    The Benjamini–Hochberg procedure controls the proportion of significant results that are misleadingly positive. For the analysis, we defined 13 repeated measures and a false discovery rate of 0.2 following the recommendations by McDonald (2014). Three aggravating effects, that are significant at a 0.05 p value, are not significant according to the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. In contrast, two additional aggravating effects become significant. Both methods identify the same significant buffering effects.

  12. 12.

    Due to our coding, we only analyze individuals who become unable to work for reasons of disabilities. Disabilities, where individuals remain economically active are not captured. Still, income could buffer this drop and this is not the case.

  13. 13.

    However, two years after separation, individuals with frequent religious attendance do not suffer significantly more from separation than individuals without or with rare religious attendance.

References

  1. Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. (2014). Do social relationships buffer the effects of widowhood? A prospective study of adaptation to the loss of a spouse. Journal of Personality, 82(5), 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anusic, I., Yap, S., & Lucas, R. (2014a). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Analysis of life satisfaction and affect in an Australian national sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anusic, I., Yap, S., & Lucas, R. (2014b). Testing set-point theory in a Swiss National Sample: Reaction and adaptation to major life events. Social Indicators Research, 119(3), 1265–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bollen, K., & Brand, J. E. (2010). A general panel model with random and fixed effects: A structural equations approach. Social Forces, 89, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boyce, C. J., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Personality prior to disability determines adaptation: Agreeable individuals recover lost life satisfaction faster and more completely. Psychological Science, 22, 1397–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Brown, G. D. A. (2010). The dark side of conscientiousness: Conscientious people experience greater drops in life satisfaction following unemployment. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 535–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandt, P. A. (1984). Stress-buffering effects of social support on maternal discipline. Nursing Research, 33(4), 229–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Calicchia, J. A., & Graham, L. B. (2006). Assessing the relationship between spirituality, life stressors, and social resources: buffers of stress in graduate students. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cassel, J. (1976). The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118(529), 222–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2002). A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1139–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Costanza, R. S., Derlega, V. J., & Winstead, B. A. (1988). Positive and negative forms of social support: Effects of conversational topics on coping with stress among same-sex friends. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24(2), 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cummins, R. A. (1990). Job stress and the buffering effect of supervisory support. Group and Organizational Studies, 15(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Personal income and subjective well-being: A review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Diener, E., Ng, W., & Harter, J. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2005). The nonobvious social psychology of happiness. Psychological Inquiry, 16, 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Doeglas, D., Suurmeijer, T., Krol, B., Sanderman, R., van Rijswijk, M., & van Leeuwen, M. (1994). Social support, social disability, and psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 7, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ford, T. E., Lappi, S. K., & Holden, C. J. (2016). Personality, humor styles and happiness: Happy people have positive humor styles. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(3), 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Greene, R. W., & Feld, S. (1989). Social support coverage and the well-being of elderly widows and married women. Journal of Family Issues, 10(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Headey, B. (2008). Life goals matter to happiness: A revision of set-point theory. Social Indicators Research, 86(2), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wooden, M. (2008). Money does not buy happiness: or does it? A reassessment based on the combined effects of wealth, income and consumption. Social Indicators Research, 87(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Joshanloo, M., & Weijers, D. (2016). Religiosity moderates the relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction across the globe. Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 731–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kidwai, R., Mancha, B. E., Brown, Q. L., & Eaton, W. W. (2014). The effect of spirituality and religious attendance on the relationship between psychological distress and negative life events. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(3), 487–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kornblith, A. B., Herndon, J. E., Zuckerman, E., Viscoli, C. M., Horwitz, R. I., Cooper, M. R., et al. (2001). Social support as a buffer to the psychological impact of stressful life events in women with breast cancer. Cancer, 91, 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Laudet, A., Morgen, K., & White, W. (2006). The role of social supports, spirituality, religiousness, life meaning and affiliation with 12-step fellowships in quality of life satisfaction among individuals in recovery from alcohol and drug problems. Alcohol Treatment Quarterly, 24(5–6), 33–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawler-Row, K. A., & Elliott, J. (2009). The role of religious activity and spirituality in the health and well-being of older adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(1), 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lechner, C. M., Tomasik, M. J., Wasilewski, J., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2013). Exploring the stress-buffering effects of religiousness in relation to social and economic change: Evidence from Poland. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 5(3), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis on differences between cognitive and affective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Martikainen, P., & Valkonen, T. (1998). Do education and income buffer the effects of death of spouse on mortality? Epidemiology, 9(5), 530–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McDonald, J. H. (2014). Multiple comparisons. In J. H. McDonald (Ed.), Handbook of biological statistics (3rd ed., pp. 254–260). Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mueller, G. (2006). Conflict buffers and marital satisfaction: On the effects of different forms of social support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Neugebauer, A., & Katz, P. P. (2004). Impact of social support on valued activity disability and depressive symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 51(4), 586–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pocnet, C., Antonietti, J. P., Strippoli, M. P., Glaus, J., Preisig, M., & Rossier, J. (2016). Individuals’ quality of life linked to major life events, perceived social support, and personality traits. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2897–2908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ritzer, G. (2007). Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802224326.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Robb, C., Small, B., & Haley, W. (2008). Gender differences in coping with functional disability in older married couples: The role of personality and social resources. Aging and Mental Health, 12(4), 423–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rook, K. S. (1984). The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sakata, S. (1997). Positive and negative effects of social support on depressive symptoms among the elderly. Komazawa University, 29, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Satija, Y. K., Advani, G. B., & Nathawat, S. S. (1998). Influence of stressful life events and coping strategies in depression. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 40(2), 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Smith, D., Langa, K., Kabeto, M., & Ubel, P. (2005). Health, wealth, and happiness: Financial resources buffer subjective well-being after the onset of a disability. Psychological Science, 16(9), 663–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Strawbridge, W. J., Shema, S. J., Cohen, R. D., Roberts, R. E., & Kaplan, G. A. (1998). Religiosity buffers effects of some stressors on depression but exacerbates others. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 53, 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Stylianos, S. K., & Vachon, M. L. S. (1993). The role of social support in bereavement. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement (pp. 397–410). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2007). Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 377–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tillmann, R., Voorpostel, M., Kuhn, U., Lebert, F., Ryser, V., Lipps, O., et al. (2016). The Swiss Household Panel Study: Observing social change since 1999. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 7(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v7i1.360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Van Baarsen, B. (2002). Theories on coping with loss: The impact of social support and self-esteem on adjustment to emotional and social loneliness following a partner’s death in later life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 57(1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wills, T., & Isasi, C. (2007). Buffering effect. In R. F. Baumester & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wink, P., Dillon, M., & Larsen, B. (2005). Religion as moderator of the depression-health connection. Research on Aging, 27(2), 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yap, S., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been realized using the data collected by the Swiss Household Panel (SHP), which is based at the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. The project is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation. The research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Project FNS—D-A-CH-10001AL_166319). The authors wish to thank Laura Ravazzini, Jehane Simona and Justus Veenman as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ursina Kuhn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuhn, U., Brulé, G. Buffering Effects for Negative Life Events: The Role of Material, Social, Religious and Personal Resources. J Happiness Stud 20, 1397–1417 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9995-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Subjective well-being
  • Life event
  • Buffer
  • Panel data
  • Religion
  • Personality