Satisfaction with Family Life in South Africa: The Role of Socioeconomic Status
- 89 Downloads
This paper investigates the determinants of self-reported satisfaction with family life, applied to the South African context, with socioeconomic status (SES) as the main covariate and family functioning as the secondary covariate of interest. An individual-, household-, and subjective SES index is constructed via multiple correspondence analysis. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and multiple-group SEM (MGSEM) are used to analyse the role of SES in explaining satisfaction with family life. Higher levels of SES, especially household SES and subjective SES, are related to greater satisfaction with family life. Family functioning, in terms of better family flexibility, is associated with higher satisfaction with family life. The MGSEM results indicate that the role of family flexibility in explaining satisfaction with family life is similar across SES quartiles; family flexibility is an important predictor of family-life satisfaction, regardless of SES quartile.
KeywordsDomain satisfaction Satisfaction with family life Socioeconomic status Family functioning South Africa
We thank the Co-Editor, Stephanie Rossouw, as well as two anonymous referees for comments and suggestions on a previous version of this paper. Participants at the 12th Conference of the International Society of Quality of Life Studies (ISQOLS), 15–18 September 2014, Berlin, and at the 5th Microeconometric Analysis of South African data Conference (MASA), 9–10 November, Durban 2015, also provided suggestions. This research was supported by Rhodes University (Grants PGSD05/2015, PGSD07/2015, and RC2014/2015/2016).
- Acock, A. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata (revised ed.). Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Agate, J. R., Zabriskie, R. B., Agate, S. T., & Poff, R. (2009). Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(2), 205–223.Google Scholar
- Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2013). Family ties. NBER working paper no. 18966. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Amoateng, A. Y., Heaton, T. B., & Kalule-Sabiti, I. (2007). Living arrangements in South Africa. In A. Y. Amoateng & T. B. Heaton (Eds.), Families and households in post-apartheid South Africa: Socio-demographic perspectives (pp. 43–59). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
- Botha, F., Wouters, E., & Booysen, F. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Family Attachment and Changeability Index (FACI8) in South Africa. Mimeo: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
- Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Howe, L. D., Hargreaves, J. R., & Huttly, S. R. A. (2008). Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). (2012). 2012 South African social attitudes survey. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
- ISSP Research Group. (2012). International Social Survey Programme: Family and changing gender roles—ISSP 2012. GESIS data archive, Cologne. ZA5900 data file version 2.0.0. doi: 10.4232/1.12022.
- Kabudula, C. W., Houle, B., Collinson, M. A., Kahn, K., Tollman, S., & Clark, S. (2016). Assessing changes in household socioeconomic status in rural South Africa, 2001–2013: A distributional analysis using household asset indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1397-z.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McCubbin, H. I., Thompson, A. I., & Elver, K. M. (1996). Family attachment and changeability index 8 (FACI8). In H. I. McCubbin, A. I. Thompson, & M. A. McCubbin (Eds.), Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice (pp. 725–751). Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Reising, M. M., Watson, K. H., Hardcastle, E. J., Merchant, M. J., Roberts, L., Forehand, R., et al. (2013). Parental depression and economic disadvantage: The role of parenting in associations with internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors on covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2010). Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. Social Research, 77(2), 679–714.Google Scholar
- Walsh, F. (2016). The new normal: Diversity and complexity in 21st-century families. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (4th ed., pp. 3–27). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar