The Great Recession increased income inequality by an average of 6%. We assesses the impact of that on subjective wellbeing (happiness, life satisfaction). Data: European Quality of Life survey, 25 representative national samples at three time points, over 70,000 respondents. Analysis: variance-components multi-level models controlling for GDP per capita (an essential point) and individual-level predictors. Findings: income inequality has no statistically significant impact before, during, or after the Great Recession. Instead (contrary to much previous research) a straightforward individualistic utilitarian–materialist understanding is supported: money does increase wellbeing but inequality itself—the gap between rich and poor—is irrelevant.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
In developing nations, there is a complication in that inequality may signal new opportunities opening, thereby raising hope for the future, hence making people happier.
This round was originally scheduled for 2007 and is sometimes referred to as the 2007 survey, but most of the surveys were conducted in 2008 (Eurofound 2016), so we will label it the "2008 wave".
The small number of countries does not allow us to assess these other contextual effects. The combined effect of all of them together shows up in our model's intercept.
Aknin, L. B., Sandstrom, G. M., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). It’s the recipient that counts: Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties. PLoS ONE,6(2), e17018.
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics,88, 2009–2042.
Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353–373). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Babones, S. J. (2008). Income inequality and population health: Correlation and causality. Social Science and Medicine,66, 1614–1626.
Beckfield, J. (2004). Does income inequality harm health? New cross-national evidence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,45(3), 231–248.
Bentham, J. (1780 ). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berg, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations: In search for an optimum that does not appear to exist. In B. Greve (Ed.), Social policy and happiness in Europe (pp. 145–173). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? NBER working paper series, 2002, No. 8841.
Bobak, M., Pikhart, H., Rose, R., Hertzman, C., & Marmo, M. (2000). Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated health: Cross-sectional data from seven post-Communist countries. Social Science and Medicine,51, 1343–1350.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). The consequences of measurement error. Structural Equations With Latent Variables. (pp. 151–169). New York, John Wiley.
Breznau, N., Lykes, V. A., Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2011). A clash of civilizations? Preferences for religious political leaders in 86 nations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,50(4), 671–691.
Bygren, M. (2004). Pay reference standards and pay satisfaction: What do workers evaluate their pay against? Social Science Research,33(2), 206–224.
Calvo, R., Zheng, Y., Kumar, S., Olgiati, A., & Berkman, L. (2012). Well-being and social capital on planet earth: Cross-national evidence from 142 countries. PLoS ONE,7(8), e42793.
Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Economic Journal,120(544), 573–594.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Daly, M., & Rose R. (2007). First European quality of life survey: Key findings from a policy perspective (Vol. 1) Luxembourg www.eurofound.europa.eu: European foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions and office for official publications of the European Communities.
Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the gallup world poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives,22, 53–72.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin,95, 542–575.
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research,112(3), 497–527.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research,40, 189–216.
Dodds, P. S., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bliss, C. A., & Danforth, C. M. (2011). Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE,6(12), e26752.
Easterlin, R. (2005). Feeding the illusion of growth and happiness: A reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven. Social Indicators Research,74, 429–443.
Eckersley, R. (2015). Beyond inequality. Social Science and Medicine,147(December), 121–125.
Esping-Andersen, G., & Nedoluzhko, L. (2017). Inequality equilibria and individual well-being. Social Science Research,62(February), 24–28.
EuroFound. (2012). European quality of life surveys (EQLS): First EQLS in 2003. Brussels: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/eqls/index.htm.
EuroFound. (2013). Eurofound survey methodology. Brussels: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/methodology/index.htm.
EuroFound. (2016). European quality of life surveys: About. Timing of surveys. Brussels: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/Surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys.
Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2004). Australian economy and society 2002: Religion, morality, and public policy in international perspective, 1984–2002. Sydney: Federation Press.
Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2017). Communism, capitalism, and images of class: Effects of reference groups, reality, and regime in 43 nations and 110,000 individuals, 1987–2009. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(4), 315-359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116677963.
Firebaugh, G. (1999). Empirics of world income inequality. American Journal of Sociology,104, 1597–1630.
Forest, K. B. (1996). Gender and the pathways to subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality,24, 19–34.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research?. Journal of Economic Literature,40, 402–435.
Gini, C. (1921). Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal,31(121 March), 124–126.
Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality,4, 107–122.
Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited: Growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research,64, 1–27.
Headey, B., Kelley, J., & Wearing, A. J. (1993). Dimensions of mental-health: Life satisfaction, positive affect, anxiety and depression. Social Indicators Research,29, 63–82.
Headey, B., Muffels, R. J. A., & Wagner, G. (2013). Choices which change life satisfaction: Similar results for Australia, Britain and Germany. Social Indicators Research,112(3), 725–748.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. J. (1992). Understanding happiness. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. -D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In: E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–184). Cambridge, MIT Press.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2012). Gross domestic product. Finance and development. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/gdp.htm. Accessed January 5, 2014.
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2016). World Economic Outlook Database. www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=29.
Jagodinski, W. (2010). Economic, social, and cultural determinants of life satisfaction: Are there differences between Asia and Europe? Social Indicators Research,97, 85–104.
Jones, F. L., & Kelley, J. (1984). Decomposing differences between groups: A cautionary note on measuring discrimination. Sociological Methods and Research,12(30), 323–343.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2008). Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996–2007. World Bank policy research working paper No. 4654.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996–2008. World Bank policy research working paper No. 4978. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1424591.
Kelley, J. (2016). Human gains and losses from global warming: Satisfaction with the climate in the USA, winter and summer, north and south. Social Indicators Research,131(1), 345–366. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1251.
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (1995). Class and class conflict in six Western nations. American Sociological Review,60(2), 157–178.
Kelley, J. & Evans, M. D. R. (2013). Inequality, happiness, socioeconomic development, and institutional regime. Invited lecture, Kozminski Unversity, Warsaw, Poland.
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2017a). Societal income inequality and individual subjective well-being: Results from 68 Societies and over 200,000 Individuals, 1981–2008. Social Science Research,62(February), 1–23.
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2017b). The new income inequality and well-being paradigm. Social Science Research,62(February), 39–74.
Kelley, J., Evans, M. D. R., Lowman, J., & Lykes, V. (2017). Group-mean-centering independent variables in multilevel models is dangerous. Quality and Quantity,51(1), 261–283.
Kenworthy, L. (2017). Income inequality probably has had little or no effect on subjective well-being. Social Science Research,62(February), 36–38.
Kim, J. S., & Frees, E. W. (2007). Multilevel modeling with correlated effects. Psychometrika,72(4), 505–533.
Koralewicz, J., & Zagorski, K. (2009). Living conditions and optimistic orientation of Poles. International Journal of Sociology,39(4), 10–44.
Landman, T., & Larizza, M. (2009). Inequality and human rights: Who controls what, when, and how. International Studies Quarterly,53, 715–736.
Lane, R. E. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and subjective well-being. American Sociological Review,75, 914–933.
Macunovich, D. J. (2011). A note on inequality aversion across countries, using two new measures. IZA working paper 5734. Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.
Ng, Y. K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability. The Economic Journal,107(445), 1848–1858.
Nielsen, F. (2017). Inequality and inequity. Social Science Research,62(February), 29–35.
Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1995). Income inequality, development, and dualism: Results from an unbalanced cross-national panel. American Sociological Review,60(5), 674–701.
O’Connell, M. (2004). Fairly satisfied: Economic equality, wealth and satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology,25, 297–305.
OECD. (2006). Gini index in glossary of statistical terms. http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=4842. Accessed June 16, (2017).
OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why Inequality keeps rising. OECD www.oecd.org/els/social/inequality. Accessed June 16, 2017.
OECD. (2015). How’s life? Measuring well-being. OECD: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/how-s-life-23089679.htm. Accessed June 16, 2017.
Oishi, S., Kesbir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science,22(9), 1095–1100.
Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2011). Area-level income inequality and individual happiness: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies,12(4), 633–649.
Pearl, J. (Ed.). (2009). Simpson’s paradox, confounding and collapsibility. In Causality (2nd ed., pp. 173–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets, and life satisfaction: The political economy of human happiness. American Political Science Review,95, 939–952.
Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the estimation of happiness. Social Indicators Research,110, 415–431.
Ross, C. E., & van Willigen, M. (1997). Education and the subjective quality of life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,38, 275–297.
Rothstein, B., & Holmberg, S. (2011). Correlates of corruption. Working paper series, The Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg ISSN 1653-8919.
Rozer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research,113(3), 1009–1023.
Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2010). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. NBER working paper 16441.
Saez, E. (2012). Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (updated with 2009 and 2010 estimates). University of California, March 2 (2012).
Schneider, S. M. (2012). Income inequality and its consequences for life satisfaction: What role do social cognitions play? Social Indicators Research,106, 419–438.
Schnittker, J. (2008). Diagnosing our national disease: Trends in income and happiness, 1973 to 2004. Social Psychology Quarterly,71, 257–280.
Schwabish, J., Smeeding, T., & Osberg, L. (2006). Income distribution and social expenditures: A cross-national perspective. In D. B. Papadimitriou (Ed.), The distributional effects of government spending and taxation (pp. 247–288). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Seidl, C., Traub, S., & Morone, A. (2005). Relative deprivation, personal income satisfaction and average well-being under different income distribution. Research paper No. 2005/04, UN University and World Institute for Development Economics Research.
Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Oxford: Clarendon.
Shmotkin, D. (1990). Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender. Social Indicators Research,23, 201–230.
Smith, A. (1776 ). The wealth of nations. New York: The Modern Library.
Star, R., & Maier, J. (2008). Faith and happiness. Review of Religious Research,50, 120–125.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. NBER working papers 14282: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14282.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How Today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives: Why GDP doesn’t add up. New York: The New Press.
Tamas, D. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). Processing power limits social group size: Computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1151.
Thin, N. (2012). Social happiness: Theory into policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
Treiman, D. J. (2009). Scale construction. In Q. Data (Ed.), Analysis (pp. 241–262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
van Praag, B. M. S. (2010). Well-being inequality and reference groups. Journal of Economic Inequality,9, 111–127.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations: Subjective appreciation of life in fifty-six nations, 1946–1992. Rotterdam: Risbo.
Veenhoven, R. (2008). Sociological theories of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 44–59). New York: Guilford Press.
Veenhoven, R. (2015). Social conditions for human happiness: A review of research. International Journal of Psychology,50, 379–391.
Veenhoven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2006). Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004: A reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research,79, 421–436.
Verme, P. (2011). Life satisfaction and income inequality. Review of Income and Wealth,57, 111–137.
Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. (2010). Agency, values, and well-being. Social Indicators Research,97, 43–63.
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology,35, 493–511.
World Bank. (2013). World development report 2013: Jobs. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2014). Gini index in data . http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI. Accessed January 5, 2014.
Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review,73, 204–226.
Zagorski, K. (2011). Income and happiness in time of post-communist modernization. Social Indicators Research,104, 331–349.
Zagorski, K., Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., & Piotrowska, K. (2014). Does national income inequality affect individuals’ quality of life in Europe? Inequality, happiness, finances, and health. Social Indicators Research,117(3), 1089–1110.
Zagorski, K., Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2010). Economic development and happiness: Evidence from 32 nations. Polish Sociological Review,2010, 3–20.
Appendix 1: Details by Nation
See Table 6.
Appendix 2: Linearity
Inequality and Well-Being
The relation between inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient and wellbeing is, to a very close approximation, linear. Figure 2 shows the relationship between the Gini coefficient for each of the surveys and the mean level of well-being in each, separately for the three waves (Wave 1 around 2003, Wave 2 around 2008, and Wave 3 in 2012. The quadratic fit line and its 95% confidence interval is shown but the curvature is so small (t = 0.022, n.s. for the quadratic component) that it appears straight.
Figure 2 corresponds to the simple bivariate Model 1 in Table 3 and, like it, suggests that inequality is associated with lower well-being before confounding factors are taken into account. Well-being is systematically high in relatively egalitarian nations (France, Germany, Slovenia, the Czech Republic) and lowest in the least egalitarian nations, notably Turkey and perhaps Macedonia. It is anomalously high—well outside the 95% confidence band—in the very equalitarian Scandinavian welfare states (Denmark, Sweden, Finland, and possibly—insofar as its single survey is representative—in Norway). It is anomalously low in Bulgaria (especially in waves 1 and 2) and several other formerly Communist nations.
Are There Curvilinear Effects of Gini When GDP is Controlled?
While inequality as measured by the Gini coefficient has only a linear bivariate relation to well-being (as we have seen in Fig. 2, above), it is possible that there could be an underlying curvilinearity which is masked by the strong effect of GDP. We test for this possibility with the regression equation (applied to the same aggregate data we have been working with):
In the event GDP of course matters greatly. But Gini and its square do not have a statistically significant effect: F(2, 76) = 2.09, p = 0.13).
Thus, there does not seem to be a masked curvilinear effect.
GDP and Well-Being
The relation between GDP per capita and well-being is approximately linear. Figure 3 shows the relationship GDP for each of the surveys and the mean level of well-being in each, separately for the three waves. The quadratic fit line and its 95% confidence interval is shown but the curvature is small and statistically insignificant (t = −0.92, n.s. for the quadratic component).
Well-being rises systematically (and strongly: r = 0.82) from the poorest nations in the study (Turkey, Estonia, Latvia) to the richest (Belgium, Netherlands, Norway). It is anomalously low in Bulgaria. The Scandinavian nations (except for Norway and Sweden in wave 3) may be anomalously high.
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, M.D.R., Kelley, J., Kelley, S.M.C. et al. Rising Income Inequality During the Great Recession Had No Impact on Subjective Wellbeing in Europe, 2003–2012. J Happiness Stud 20, 203–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9917-3
- Subjective wellbeing
- Life satisfaction
- Great Recession
- GDP per capita
- Multi-level models
- Quality of life
- Socioeconomic development
- Income inequality