Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 817–839 | Cite as

Sense of Coherence, Time Perspective and Positive Aging

  • Ulrich Wiesmann
  • Ilka Ballas
  • Hans-Joachim Hannich
Research Paper

Abstract

Recent gerontological research has identified the sense of coherence as a crucial resilience factor which develops over time and evolves from experiences across the life-span. Time perspective is the process by which life experiences are assigned to temporal categories which give coherence to these experiences. In the present study, we tested the salutogenic hypothesis that time perspective reflects a psychological resource that shapes the sense of coherence, and that both are important predictors of positive aging as indicated by subjective well-being and psychological health. We examined 210 individuals (60.5% women) at the mean age of 70.4 years using the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, a questionnaire measuring five time perspective dimensions and a balanced time perspective. We found that (a) two time perspectives—a lack of concentration on the negative past and a high future orientation—predicted the sense of coherence, and that (b) the sense of coherence was a mediator of the time perspective dimensions–positive aging relationship. An exploratory path analytical model fitted our data well. Furthermore, (c) a balanced time perspective was associated with both the sense of coherence and positive aging, disclosing partial mediation of the sense of coherence. With regards to our analytical model, the sense of coherence and—to a lesser degree—time perspective dimensions and a balanced temporal perspective are important correlates of positive aging. In line with recent salutogenic research, our findings suggest that the sense of coherence represents a higher-order concept which pools psychological resource influences on positive aging.

Keywords

Time perspectives Sense of coherence Well-being Positive aging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ulrike Plötz and Katharina Piontek for editorial help with the manuscript.

References

  1. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Antonovsky, A. (1992). Can attitudes contribute to health? Advances, The Journal of Mind-Body Health, 8(4), 33–49.Google Scholar
  4. Antonovsky, A., & Sagy, S. (1990). Confronting developmental tasks in the retirement transition. Gerontologist, 30(3), 362–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). Amos 21 reference guide. Meadville: Amos Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Baltes, P. B., Mayer, K. U., Helmchen, H., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (1999). The Berlin Aging Study (BASE): Sample, design, and overview of measures. In P. B. Baltes & K. U. Mayer (Eds.), The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100 (pp. 15–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. H., & Charles, S. T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27(2), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables. Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desmyter, F., & De Raedt, R. (2012). The relationship between time perspective and subjective well-being of older adults. Psychologica Belgica, 52(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dezutter, J., Wiesmann, U., Apers, S., & Luyckx, K. (2013). Sense of coherence, depressive feelings and life satisfaction in older persons: A closer look at the role of integrity and despair. Aging and Mental Health, 17(7), 839–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 187–194)., Oxford library of psychology New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Drageset, J., Espehaug, B., Hallberg, I. R., & Natvig, G. K. (2014). Sense of coherence among cognitively intact nursing home residents—A five-year longitudinal study. Aging and Mental Health, 18(7), 889–896. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.896866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drageset, J., Nygaard, H. A., Eide, G. E., Bondevik, M., Nortvedt, M. W., & Natvig, G. K. (2008). Sense of coherence as a resource in relation to health-related quality of life among mentally intact nursing home residents—A questionnaire study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 6, 85. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time and Society, 17(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2011). Positive ageing: Objective, subjective, and combined outcomes. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 7(1), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fries, J. F. (2002). Successful aging—An emerging paradigm of gerontology. Journal of Clinical and Geriatric Medicine, 18(3), 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fry, P. S., & Debats, D. L. (2010). Sources of human life-strengths, resilience, and health. In P. S. Fry & C. L. M. Keyes (Eds.), New frontiers in resilient aging: Life-strengths and well-being in late life (pp. 15–59). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerostat. (2014). Statistisches informations system Gerostat [Gerostat—Statistical Information System]. Retrieved November 19, 2014 from http://www.gerostat.de/.
  22. Hill, R. D., & Smith, D. J. (2015). Positive aging: At the crossroads of positive psychology and geriatric medicine. In P. A. Lichtenberg, B. T. Mast, B. D. Carpenter, J. Loebach Wetherell, P. A. Lichtenberg, B. T. Mast, et al. (Eds.), APA handbook of clinical geropsychology. Vol. 1: History and status of the field and perspectives on aging (pp. 301–329)., APA handbooks in psychology Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Kazakina, E. (1999). Time perspective of older adults: Relationships to attachment style, psychological well-being, and psychological distress. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Information and Learning.Google Scholar
  24. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lawton, M. P. (1975). PGCMS. The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  27. Lövheim, H., Graneheim, U. H., Jonsén, E., Strandberg, G., & Lundman, B. (2013). Changes in sense of coherence in old age—A 5-year follow-up of the Umeå 85 + study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(1), 13–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00988.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marengoni, A., Angleman, S., Melis, R., Mangialasche, F., Karp, A., Garmen, A., et al. (2011). Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing Research Reviews, 10(4), 430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norekval, T. M., Fridlund, B., Moons, P., Nordrehaug, J. E., Saevareid, H. I., Wentzel-Larsen, T., et al. (2010). Sense of coherence—A determinant of quality of life over time in older female acute myocardial infarction survivors. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(5–6), 820–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02858.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinquart, M., & Forstmeier, S. (2012). Effects of reminiscence interventions on psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis. Aging and Mental Health, 16(5), 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rennemark, M., & Hagberg, B. (1997). Sense of coherence among the elderly in relation to their perceived life history in an Eriksonian perspective. Aging and Mental Health, 1(3), 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (2015). Successful aging 2.0: Conceptual expansions for the 21st century. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70B(4), 593–596. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scholz, U., König, C., Eicher, S., & Martin, M. (2015). Stabilisation of health as the centre point of a health psychology of ageing. Psychology and Health, 30(6), 732–749. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.991733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schumacher, J., Gunzelmann, T., & Brähler, E. (2000a). Deutsche Normierung der Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky [Standardization of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale in the German population]. Diagnostica, 46(4), 208–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schumacher, J., Wilz, G., Gunzelmann, T., & Brähler, E. (2000b). Die Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky. Teststatistische Überprüfung in einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe und Konstruktion einer Kurzskala [Antonovsky’s Sense of Coherence Scale. Test-statistical examination in a representative population sample and construction of a short scale]. Zeitschrift für Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, 50, 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinnige, J., Korevaar, J. C., Westert, G. P., Spreeuwenberg, P., Schellevis, F. G., & Braspenning, J. C. (2015). Multimorbidity patterns in a primary care population aged 55 years and over. Family Practice, 32(5), 505–513. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sobol-Kwapinska, M., & Jankowski, T. (2015). Positive time: Balanced time perspective and positive orientation. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9656-2.Google Scholar
  40. Stolarski, M., Bitner, J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time and Society, 20(3), 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stolarski, M., Matthews, G., Postek, S., Zimbardo, P. G., & Bitner, J. (2014). How we feel is a matter of time: Relationships between time perspectives and mood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 809–827. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9450-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ware, J. E., Gandek, B., & the IQOLA Project Group. (1994). The SF-36® Health Survey: Development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA Project. International Journal of Mental Health, 23(2), 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2014). Celebrating fifty years of research and applications in reminiscence and life review: State of the art and new directions. Journal of Aging Studies, 29, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E., & Webster, J. D. (2010). Reminiscence and mental health: A review of recent progress in theory, research and interventions. Ageing and Society, 30(4), 697–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiesmann, U., Dezutter, J., & Hannich, H.-J. (2014). Sense of coherence and pain experience in older age. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(1), 123–133.Google Scholar
  46. Wiesmann, U., & Hannich, H.-J. (2008). A salutogenic view on well-being in active elderly persons. Aging and Mental Health, 12(1), 56–65. doi: 10.1080/13607860701365998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiesmann, U., & Hannich, H.-J. (2010). A salutogenic analysis of healthy aging in active elderly persons. Research on Aging, 32(3), 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiesmann, U., & Hannich, H.-J. (2011a). A salutogenic analysis of developmental tasks and ego integrity vs. despair. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 73(4), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wiesmann, U., & Hannich, H.-J. (2011b). Salutogenic perspectives on health maintenance: The role of resistance resources and meaningfulness. GeroPsych—The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry, 24(3), 127–135.Google Scholar
  50. Wiesmann, U., & Hannich, H.-J. (2013). The contribution of resistance resources and sense of coherence to life satisfaction in older age. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 911–928. doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9361-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiesmann, U., & Hannich, H.-J. (2014). A salutogenic analysis of the well-being paradox in older age. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 339–355. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9425-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiesmann, U., Niehörster, G., & Hannich, H.-J. (2009). Subjective health in old age from a salutogenic perspective. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(4), 767–787. doi: 10.1348/135910709X413124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiesmann, U., Rölker, S., Ilg, H., Hirtz, P., & Hannich, H.-J. (2006). Zur Stabilität und Modifizierbarkeit des Kohärenzgefühls aktiver älterer Menschen [On the Stability and Modifiability of the Sense of Coherence in Active Seniors]. Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 39(2), 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1261–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). The time paradox. http://www.thetimeparadox.com/surveys/. Accessed 6 Nov 2012 2014.
  57. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Medical PsychologyUniversity Medicine GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations