Do Envy and Compassion Pave the Way to Unhappiness? Social Preferences and Life Satisfaction in a Spanish City

Abstract

Mounting evidence shows that people’s self-reported life satisfaction (LS) is negatively related to income inequality. Under the interpretation that the relationship between macro-level variables and LS reflects individuals’ social preferences, this finding indicates that most people display inequality-averse preferences. We explore the relationship between self-reports on inequality aversion and LS in a citywide representative survey/experiment conducted in Spain. If self-reported well-being can be used to infer people’s social preferences, LS should correlate negatively with both “envy” and “compassion” scores (i.e., how much one suffers from disadvantageous and advantageous inequality, respectively). We find that LS relates negatively to envy but positively to compassion, which would imply that suffering from observing poorer others, paradoxically, increases well-being. Using an incentivized Dictator Game as a measure of generous behavior, we reject the hypothesis that the positive link between compassion and LS is actually driven by generosity. We discuss how these findings could indicate that the way LS is used to assess social preferences in the population should be revised.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yet the income distribution can matter for self-regarding individuals as well. Indeed, from the point of view of narrow self-interest, the prospect of being in a different position of the income scale in the future may affect well-being depending on how likely the different scenarios are (e.g., how much social mobility exists in a society) and how risk-averse the individual is (see, e.g., Hirschman and Rothschild 1973; Alesina et al. 2004; Senik 2004, 2008). Accordingly, “behind the veil of ignorance”, a selfish individual’s “inequality aversion” is identical to her risk aversion and is therefore measured by the concavity of the utility function (Mas-Collel et al. 1995). Inequality may also be regarded as negative for self-interest if it is perceived to be linked to an increase of criminal activities, insecurity and the like (Elgar and Aitken 2010; Delhey and Dragolov 2014). However, self-interest cannot account for the whole range of empirical results on the relationship between income distribution and well-being (e.g., Clark and D'Ambrosio 2014; Ferrer-i-Carbonell and Ramos 2014).

  2. 2.

    The expression “on average” refers here to the comparison with an “average” other, that is, to the sign of the first derivative of the utility function with respect to others’ income. However, when comparisons are perceived asymmetrically it should be noted that, for constant values of both alpha and beta, the likelihood of being (“on average”) competitive decreases with income rank as does the relative frequency of disadvantageous comparisons. See the Electronic Supplementary Material for further details.

  3. 3.

    The question was as follows: “You think that success in life depends mostly on (only one option): (a) Luck; (b) Effort”.

  4. 4.

    The question was as follows: “Generally speaking, do you believe that: (a) Most people can be trusted; (b) You must be very prudent when interacting with people”.

  5. 5.

    The question was: “Using the scale appearing on the card, how much trust do you have in the public administration?: none at all, not very much, quite a lot, a great deal, hard to answer”.

  6. 6.

    The questions were as follows: “Are you a member of a voluntary organization—for example the Red Cross, an NGO, political party, sports club, church choir, economic association…? Yes, No”.

    (If s/he is a member):

    “How many hours do you spend on this kind of activity per week?”.

  7. 7.

    The question was as follows: “At this point, you have to answer if you agree or disagree with the following statements on a scale between 1 and 7 like the one on the card. 1 means that you completely disagree and 7 means that you completely agree while 4 is the neutral point.

    I think I am a valuable person, at least in comparison with others. (self-esteem 1)

    I think I have many good characteristics. (self-esteem 2)

    I am capable of doing things as well as other people do. (self-esteem 3)

    I have a positive attitude towards myself. (self-esteem 4)”

    Construct validity was established using factor analysis and internal consistency was determined by the Cronbach alpha statistical test: the instrument showed a Cronbach alpha of 0.75, which is considered appropriate.

  8. 8.

    Note that due to the observed distribution of choices, such a classification leaves 53% of participants with an above-median score in envy (i.e., all those respondents scoring above the minimum level—category 1: “completely disagree”) and 42% with an above-median score in compassion (i.e., categories 5–7).

  9. 9.

    For the sake of brevity, here we do not report the coefficients of the control variables since they are very similar to those shown in Table 3. The complete regressions can be found in Table A3 of the Electronic Supplementary Material.

  10. 10.

    Note that if we define individual preferences as “equality seeking” instead of inequality averse, in the sense that full inequality acts as the baseline situation and any departure from it (towards more equality) increases the utility obtained from one’s own payoff, the predicted relationship of LS with either alpha or beta would be positive rather than negative, but never of opposite signs.

  11. 11.

    Moreover, as we discuss in the Electronic Supplementary Material, pure competitive preferences predict a strong negative correlation between beta and alpha, but we find their relationship to be non-significant.

References

  1. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2009–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anik, L., Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I., Dunn, E. W., & Quoidbach, J. (2013). Prosocial bonuses increase employee satisfaction and team performance. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e75509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ateca-Amestoy, V., Aguilar, A. C., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2014). Social interactions and life satisfaction: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 527–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bárcena-Martín, E., Cortés-Aguilar, A., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2016). Social comparisons on subjective well-being: The role of social and cultural capital. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9768-3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barrós-Loscertales, A., Espín, A. M., & Perales, J. C. (2016). Social comparisons are associated with poorer and riskier financial decision making, no matter whether encounters are sporadic or repeated. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bault, N., Joffily, M., Rustichini, A., & Coricelli, G. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex and striatum mediate the influence of social comparison on the decision process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(38), 16044–16049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellemare, C., Kröger, S., & van Soest, A. (2008). Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities. Econometrica, 76(4), 815–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beranek, B., Cubitt, R., & Gächter, S. (2015). Stated and revealed inequality aversion in three subject pools. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biancotti, C., & D’Alessio, G. (2008). Values, inequality and happiness. Temi di discussione: Bank of Italy, Economic and Financial Statistics Department, No. 669.

  15. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brañas-Garza, P., Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game. Scientific Reports, 4, 6025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cardenas, J. C., & Carpenter, J. (2008). Behavioural development economics: Lessons from field labs in the developing world. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(3), 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carl, N., & Billari, F. C. (2014). Generalized trust and intelligence in the United States. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e91786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Casas, F., Fernández-Artamendi, S., Montserrat, C., Bravo, A., Bertrán, I., & Valle, J. F. D. (2013). El bienestar subjetivo en la adolescencia: Estudio comparativo de dos Comunidades Autónomas en España. Anales de Psicología, 29(1), 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Charness, G., & Grosskopf, B. (2001). Relative payoffs and happiness: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 301–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, A. E. (2003). Inequality-aversion and income mobility: A direct test. DELTA Discussion Paper 2003-11.

  27. Clark, A. E. (2015). Is happiness the best measure of well-being? In M. Adler & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Clark, A. E., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2014). Attitudes to income inequality: Experimental and survey evidence. In A. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2A). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cojocaru, A. (2014). Fairness and inequality tolerance: Evidence from the life in transition survey. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(3), 590–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Corgnet, B., Espín, A. M., & Hernán-González, R. (2015). The cognitive basis of social behavior: Cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. D’Ambrosio, C., & Frick, J. R. (2012). Individual wellbeing in a dynamic perspective. Economica, 79(314), 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (2009). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. In E. Diener (Ed.), Culture and well-being (pp. 71–91). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176–11183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Easterlin, R., Angelescu-McVey, L., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463–22468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Elgar, F. J., & Aitken, N. (2010). Income inequality, trust and homicide in 33 countries. The European Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Espín, A. M., Brañas-Garza, P., Herrmann, B., & Gamella, J. F. (2012). Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1749), 4923–4928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., Herrmann, B., & Brañas-Garza, P. (2015). Short-and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., & Neyse, L. (2016). Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: A tale of two roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Exadaktylos, F., Espín, A. M., & Branas-Garza, P. (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Scientific Reports, 3, 1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Falk, A., & Knell, M. (2004). Choosing the Joneses: Endogenous goals and reference standards. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fehr, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and co-operation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—Experimental evidence and new theories. In S. C. Kolm (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity. Handbooks in economics, 23 (Vol. 1, pp. 615–691). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 997–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Ramos, X. (2010). Inequality aversion and risk attitudes. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4703.

  51. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Ramos, X. (2014). Inequality and happiness. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(5), 1016–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C. E., et al. (2007). Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science, 318(5854), 1305–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic behavior, 6(3), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world: The paradox of happy peasants and miserable millionaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Grosfeld, I., & Senik, C. (2010). The emerging aversion to inequality. Economics of Transition, 18(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Helliwell, J. F., & Huang, H. (2010). How’s the job? Well-being and social capital in the workplace. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Helliwell, J., & Wang, S. (2011). Trust and wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 42–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767–1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2008). The appearance of homo rivalis: Social preferences and the nature of rent seeking. CeDEx discussion paper series, No. 2008-10.

  62. Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319(5868), 1362–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hirschman, A., & Rothschild, M. (1973). The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(4), 544–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hopkins, E. (2008). Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: What actually is their relationship? The Journal of Economic Inequality, 6(4), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 150(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kimbrough, E. O., & Reiss, J. P. (2012). Measuring the distribution of spitefulness. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e41812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Koch, C. (2015). The virtue ethics hypothesis: Is there a nexus between pro-social behavior and well-being? Available at SSRN 2584334.

  69. Konow, J., & Earley, J. (2008). The hedonistic paradox: Is homo economicus happier? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Levitt, S., & List, J. (2007). what do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Micreconomic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  73. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Morawetz, D., Atia, E., Bin-Nun, G., Felous, L., Gariplerden, Y., Harris, E., et al. (1977). Income distribution and self-rated happiness: Some empirical evidence. The Economic Journal, 87(347), 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ng, Y. K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1848–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2011). Area-level income inequality and individual happiness: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(4), 633–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Phelps, C. D. (2001). A clue to the paradox of happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(3), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Rodríguez-Lara, I., & Moreno-Garrido, L. (2012). Self-interest and fairness: Self-serving choices of justice principles. Experimental Economics, 15(1), 158–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Ruffle, B. J. (1998). More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior, 23(2), 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Senik, C. (2004). When information dominates comparison. Learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 2099–2123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Senik, C. (2008). Ambition and jealousy: Income interactions in the “Old” Europe versus the “New” Europe and the United States. Economica, 75(299), 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Overbidding and heterogeneous behavior in contest experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(3), 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Stutzer, A., & Lalive, R. (2004). The role of social work norms in job searching and subjective well-being. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(4), 696–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Tabibnia, G., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Fairness and cooperation are rewarding. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Van Lange, P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine, 62(7), 1768–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has benefited from comments by Filippos Exadaktylos, Francisco Gómez García and Hannes Schwandt. Thanks are also due to Pablo Brañas-Garza for encouraging this project and for his valuable suggestions. Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (ECO2013-44879-R) and the Government of Andalusia Project for Excellence in Research (P12.SEJ.01436) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José A. Rodríguez Martín.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 520 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Espín, A.M., Moreno-Herrero, D., Sánchez-Campillo, J. et al. Do Envy and Compassion Pave the Way to Unhappiness? Social Preferences and Life Satisfaction in a Spanish City. J Happiness Stud 19, 443–469 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9828-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Competitiveness
  • Dictator game
  • Generosity
  • Happiness
  • Inequality aversion
  • Life satisfaction