Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 365–379 | Cite as

Personality Traits and Metacognitions as Predictors of Positive Mental Health in College Students

  • C. Marino
  • A. Vieno
  • M. Lenzi
  • B. A. Fernie
  • A. V. Nikčević
  • M. M. Spada
Research Paper
  • 458 Downloads

Abstract

Presence and absence of both psychological distress and well-being are important in predicting life outcomes among youths. Recently, scholars have been paying increased attention to the role of positive mental health (PMH) in predicting psycho-social well-being among young people. The present study aims to test a model designed to assess the unique contribution of personality traits and metacognitions to four domains of PMH (belief-in-self, belief-in-others, emotional competence, and engaged living) among young adults. A total of 795 Italian college students participated in the study. Path analysis revealed that different personality traits were contributors to different PMH domains, and that four of the five metacognitions domains (negative beliefs about thoughts, cognitive confidence, need to control thoughts, and cognitive self-consciousness) differently predicted the four PMH domains. In conclusion it would appear that a combination of personality traits and metacognitions are differently involved in PMH domains. These should be taken into account when developing preventive programmes to promote PMH among young adults.

Keywords

Metacognitions Personality traits Positive mental health 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author BAF receives salary support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Research Unit at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.

References

  1. Bacow, T. L., Pincus, D. B., Ehrenreich, J. T., & Brody, L. R. (2009). The metacognitions questionnaire for children: Development and validation in a clinical sample of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(6), 727–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Berzonsky, M. D. (2011). A social-cognitive perspective on identity construction. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 55–76). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The big five questionnaire: A new questionnaire for the measurement of the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Livi, S. (1994). Mapping personality dimensions in the big five model. European Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 9–16.Google Scholar
  7. Caprara, G. V., & Cervone, D. (2000). Personality: Determinants, dynamics and potentials. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiaburu, D. S., Cho, I., & Gardner, R. (2015). Authenticity matters more than intelligence and personality in predicting metacognition. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(7), 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furlong, M. J., You, S., Renshaw, T. L., O’Malley, M. D., & Rebelez, J. (2013). Preliminary development of the Positive Experiences at School Scale for elementary school children. Child Indicators Research, 6, 753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furlong, M. J., You, S., Renshaw, T. L., Smith, D. C., & O’Malley, M. D. (2014). Preliminary development and validation of the Social and Emotional Health Survey for secondary school students. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 1011–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia, D. (2011). Two models of personality and well-being among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1208–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001a). Happiness, introversion–extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001b). Emotional stability as a major dimension of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1357–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, C. N., You, S., & Furlong, M. J. (2013). A preliminary examination of covitality as integrated well-being in college students. Social Indicators Research, 111(2), 511–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joshanloo, M., & Afshari, S. (2011). Big five personality traits and self-esteem as predictors of life satisfaction in Iranian Muslim University students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  20. Lamers, S. M., Westerhof, G. J., Kovács, V., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Differential relationships in the association of the Big Five personality traits with positive mental health and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsen, R. J., & Eid, M. (2008). Ed Diener and the science of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 1–13). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ostaszewski, K., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2006). The effects of cumulative risks and promotive factors on urban adolescent alcohol and other drug use: A longitudinal study of resiliency. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quattropani, M. C., Lenzo, V., Mucciardi, M., & Toffle, M. E. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Short Form of the Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 269, 29–41.Google Scholar
  26. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
  27. Renshaw, T. L., Furlong, M. J., Dowdy, E., Rebelez, J., Smith, D. C., O’Malley, M. D., et al. (2014). Covitality: A synergistic conception of adolescents’ mental health. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in the schools (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  28. Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Why is positive psychology necessary? American Psychologist, 56, 216–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sica, C., Steketee, G., Ghisi, M., Chiri, L. R., & Franceschini, S. (2007). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies predict worry, obsessive-compulsive symptoms and coping styles: A preliminary prospective study on an Italian non-clinical sample. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spada, M. M., Mohiyeddini, C., & Wells, A. (2008). Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the Metacognitions Questionnaire 30. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suldo, S. M., Thalji, A., & Ferron, J. (2011). Longitudinal academic outcomes predicted by early adolescents’ subjective well-being, psychopathology, and mental health status yielded from a dual-factor model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trapnell, P. D., & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waterman, A. S. (1982). Identity development from adolescence to adulthood: An extension of theory and review of research. Developmental Psychology, 18, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Wells, A. (2013). Advances in metacognitive therapy. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 6, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(4), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wells, A., & Davies, M. I. (1994). The Thought Control Questionnaire: A measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(8), 871–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Marino
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Vieno
    • 1
  • M. Lenzi
    • 1
  • B. A. Fernie
    • 3
  • A. V. Nikčević
    • 4
  • M. M. Spada
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Psicologia dello Sviluppo e della SocializzazioneUniversità degli Studi di PadovaPaduaItaly
  2. 2.Division of Psychology, School of Applied SciencesLondon South Bank UniversityLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyKingston UniversityKingston-upon-ThamesUK

Personalised recommendations