Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1841–1857 | Cite as

Happiness and Globalization: A Spatial Econometric Approach

  • Chun-Hung A. LinEmail author
  • Suchandra Lahiri
  • Ching-Po Hsu
Research Paper

Abstract

Based on the data of Gallup World Poll Survey (GWP), this study employs a spatial 2SLS (two stage least square) model to examines the impact of globalization on the level of happiness across 145 nations. We observe endogeneity of the spatial lag term (Wh) on happiness as well as spatial dependencies in the independent variables (WX’s) which represents indirect effects from a change in X’s in the neighboring regions. We observe contrasting spillover effects (own v/s neighboring effect) of the same explanatory variable generating positive or negative effect, respectively, across space. Further, an inverted ‘U’ Kuznet curve reveals a non-linear relationship between average happiness and happiness inequality. At low levels, an increase in well-being appears to hurt the poor; but beyond a certain threshold, it seems to reduce inequality. We observed among countries that happiness inequalities for developed regions are more when compared to developing regions.

Keywords

Happiness Globalization Spatial dependence Kuznet-curve 

References

  1. Ahluwalia, Montek S. (1976). Inequality, poverty and development. Journal of Development Economics, 3, 307–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., DiTella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. The Netherlands: Kluwert Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. payne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chadi, A. (2014). Regional Unemployment and Norm-Induced Effects on Life Satisfaction. Empirical Economics, 46(3), 1111–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. (2008). Relative Income, Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: models and applications. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  9. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2006). Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreher, A. (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalization—Gauging its Consequence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 520–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helliwell, J., & Huang, H. (2008). How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henderson, H. (2002). Globalization and quality of life. Talking points for the Calvert group press briefing. Washington, DC: National Press Club.Google Scholar
  17. Hessami, Z. (2011). Globalization’s winners and losers—Evidence from life satisfaction data, 1975–2001. Economics Letters, 112, 250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jorda, V., & Sarabia, J. M. (2014). Well-being distribution in the globalization era: 30 years of convergence. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi: 10.1007/s11482-0149304-8.Google Scholar
  19. Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2005). Measuring Inequality of Happiness inNations. In Search for Proper Statistics, Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 357–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelejian, H., & Prucha, I. (1998). A generalized spatial two stages least square procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. J Real Estate Finance Econ, 17(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelejian, H., & Prucha, I. (1999). A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Econ Rev, 40(2), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45(l), 1–28.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, L. F. (2003). Best spatial two-stage least squares estimators for a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Econometric Reviews, 22(307), 335.Google Scholar
  24. LeSage, J. P., & Pace, K. R. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Florida: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin, C. A., Lahiri, S., & Hsu, C. P. (2014). Happiness and Regional Segmentation: Does Space Matter? Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). Geography of European life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 101(1), 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2011). Well-being across America. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1118–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ott, J. (2005). Level and inequality of happiness in nations: does greater happiness of a greater number imply greater inequality in happiness? Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ott, J. (2008). Government effectiveness and happiness in 131 nations in 2006. Mimeo: Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Pace, K., & LeSage, J. (2008). Biases of OLS and spatial lags models in the presence of omitted variable and spatially dependent variables. In A. P´aez, J. Le Gallo, R. Buliung, & S. Dall’Erba (Eds.), Progress in spatial analysis: Theory and methods, and thematic applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Ram, R. (1990). Educational Expansion and Schooling Inequality: International Evidence and Some Implications. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanz, I., F., Martinez-i-Coma & Steinberg, F. 2008. Does Social Spending Increase Support for free Trade in Advanced Democracies? Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros, Documento de Trabajo No 432/2008.Google Scholar
  33. Seligman, M. E. (2012). Flourish: A visionary newunderstanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Shultz, C. J., II, Rahtz, D. R., & Speece, M. (2004). Globalization, Transformation and QOL: Reflections on ICMD-8. Journal of Macromarketing, 24(2), 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sirgy, J., Lee, D. J., Miller, C., & Littlefield, J. E. (2004). The impact of globalization on a country’s quality of life: toward an integrated model. Social Indicators Research, 68(3), 251–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stanca, L. (2010). The Geography of Economics and Happiness: Spatial Patterns in the Effects of Economic Conditions on Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, Springer, 99(1), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsai, M. C., Chang, H. H., & Chen, W. C. (2011). Globally Happy: Individual Globalization. Expanded Capacities, and Subjective Wellbeing Social Indicators Research, 108, 509–524.Google Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (1990). Inequality in happiness, inequality in countries compared between countries. Paper presented at the12th Work Congress of Sociology, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Return of Inequality in Modern Society? Test by Dispersion of Life-Satisfaction Across Time and Nations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(4), 457–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang, T. C., Noah, A. J., & Shoff, C. (2013). Exploring geographic variation in U.S mortality rates using a spatial durbin approach. Population, Space and Place, 21(1), 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun-Hung A. Lin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suchandra Lahiri
    • 2
  • Ching-Po Hsu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EconomicsTamkang UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan
  2. 2.Sutherland Global Services Private Ltd.MumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Taiwan Institute of Economic ResearchTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations