Your Strengths are Calling: Preliminary Results of a Web-Based Strengths Intervention to Increase Calling

Abstract

Cross-sectional research indicated that the application of signature strengths at work seemed to be crucial for perceiving a job as a calling. The present study aimed at testing this assumed causality in a random-assignment, placebo-controlled web-based intervention study. The intervention group (n = 83) was instructed to use their four highest character strengths more often at work for 4 weeks. Meanwhile the control group (n = 69) reflected about four situations (independent from the current workplace) where they excelled. For the evaluation of the effects of the two conditions, participants completed measures on calling and global life satisfaction before (Pretest), directly after the four-week training period (Posttest 1), and 3 (Posttest 2) and 6 months (Posttest 3) later. Calling significantly increased in the intervention group but not in the control group from Pretest to Posttest 1, and remained constant until Posttest 3. Global life satisfaction significantly increased in the intervention group but not in the control group from Pretest to Posttest 2 and from Posttest 1 to Posttest 3. That indicated that the changes on global life satisfaction were less steep than the changes in calling and lagged, but significant long lasting changes were observed likewise. Results supported the assumption that the application of strengths at work impacts calling and life satisfaction. Limitations as well as implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    Intervention group was instructed to use the individually four highest character strengths more often and in new ways at work. As most jobs require the interaction with others, this intervention is very likely to alter the nature of interactions at work; this is one of the job crafting practices presented by Wrzesniewski and Dutton (2001). However, job crafting practices may also include changes in the design of the job (e.g., alter type and number of job tasks; Wrzesniewski and Dutton 2001), and that was not part of the strengths intervention.

References

  1. Allan, B. A., & Duffy, R. D. (2014). Examining moderators of signature strengths use and well-being: Calling and signature strengths level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 323–337. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9424-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 32–57. doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butcher, J. M., & Pancheri, P. (1976). A handbook of cross-national MMPI research. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A. L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, P., & Tyrer, P. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321, 694–696. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being. Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157. doi:10.1007/BF01207052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 424–450. doi:10.1177/0011000008316430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dik, B. J., Eldridge, B. M., Steger, M. F., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Development and validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale (BCS). Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 242–263. doi:10.1177/1069072711434410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The development of a scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64, 1001–1049. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01234.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common method bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374–406. doi:10.1177/109442819814002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., & Bott, E. M. (2013). Calling and life satisfaction: It’s not about having it, it’s about living it. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 42–52. doi:10.1037/a0030635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duffy, R. D., Dik, B. J., & Steger, M. F. (2011). Calling and work-related outcomes: Career commitment as a mediator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards, J. R., & Shipp, A. J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 209–258). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elangovan, A. R., Pinder, C. C., & McLean, M. (2010). Callings and organizational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 428–440. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Finkel, S. (2004). Cross-lagged. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 229–230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412950589.n202.

  19. Forest, J., Mageau, G. V. A., Crevier-Braud, L., Bergeron, L., Dubreuil, P., & Lavigne, G. V. L. (2012). Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature strengths’ use and well-being at work: Test of an intervention program. Human Relations, 65, 1233–1252. doi:10.1177/0018726711433134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gander, F., Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength-based positive interventions: Further evidence on their potential for enhancing well-being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1241–1259. doi:10.1007%2Fs10902-012-9380-0.

  21. Goldenhar, L. M., LaMontagne, A. D., Katz, T., Heaney, C., & Landsbergis, P. (2001). The intervention research process in occupational safety and health: An overview from the National Occupational Research Agenda Intervention Effectiveness Research Team. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 43, 616–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hagger, M. S., & Luszczynska, A. (2014). Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: State of the research and proposals for the way forward. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6, 1–47. doi:10.1111/aphw.12017.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2012). When the job is a calling: The role of applying one’s signature strengths at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 362–371. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.702784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 965–983. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2014). The role of character strengths for task performance, job dedication, interpersonal facilitation, and organizational support. Human Performance, 27, 183–205. doi:10.1080/08959285.2014.913592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2015). The relationships of character strengths with coping, work-related stress, and job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 165. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hirschi, A., & Herrmann, A. (2013). Calling and career preparation: Investigating developmental patterns and temporal precedence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83, 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of work personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kok, G., Schaalma, H., Ruiter, R. A. C., van Empelen, P., & Brug, J. (2004). Intervention mapping: Protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. Journal of Health Psychology, 9, 85–98. doi:10.1177/1359105304038379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An investigative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implication. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Billsberry, J. (2013). Fit for the future. In A. L. Kristof-Brown, & J. Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 1–18). Oxford, UK: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118320853.ch1.

  32. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmermann, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lauver, K., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job fit and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454–470. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. F. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 419–430. doi:10.1080/17439760.2010.516765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lowe, G. (2010). Creating healthy organizations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005a). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005b). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Meyers, M. C., van Woerkom, M., & Bakker, A. (2013). Added value of the positive: A literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 618–632. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.694689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell, J., Stanimirovic, R., Klein, B., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). A randomised controlled trial of a self-guided internet intervention promoting well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 749–760. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Novak, M. (1996). Business as a calling: Work and the examined life. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2007). Methodological issues in positive psychology and the assessment of character strengths. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. van Dulmen (Eds.), Handbook of methods in positive psychology (pp. 292–305). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Peterson, C. (2006). The Values in Action (VIA) classification of strengths. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), A life worth living: Contributions to positive psychology (pp. 29–48). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peterson, C., Park, N., Hall, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 161–172. doi:10.1002/job.584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Assessment of character strengths. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (2nd ed., pp. 93–98). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientation to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149–156. doi:10.1080/17439760701228938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of wellbeing and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 153–169. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9181-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 275–292. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Quinlan, D., Swain, N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2012). Character strengths interventions: Building on what we know for improved outcomes. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 1145–1163. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ruch, W., Harzer, C., Proyer, R. T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2010a). Ways to happiness in German-speaking countries: The adaptation of the German version of the orientations to happiness questionnaire in paper-pencil and internet samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 224–231. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2010b). Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS): Adaptation and validation of the German version and the development of a peer-rating form. Journal of Individual Differences, 31, 138–149. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., & Weber, M. (2010c). Humor as character strength among the elderly: Empirical findings on age-related changes and its contribution to satisfaction with life. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 43, 13–18. doi:10.1007/s00391-009-0090-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sin, N., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 467–487. doi:10.1002/jclp.20593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Steger, M. F., Pickering, N. K., Shin, J. Y., & Dik, B. J. (2010). Calling in work: Secular or sacred? Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 82–96. doi:10.1177/1069072709350905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ten Berge, M. A., & De Raad, B. (1999). Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective. A review. European Journal of Personality, 13, 337–360. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<337:AID-PER363>3.0.CO;2-F.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Walton, R. E. (1975). Criteria for quality of working life. In L. E. Davis & A. B. Cherns (Eds.), The quality of working life (Vol. 1, pp. 91–104). New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Weiss, J. W., Skelley, M. F., Haughey, J. C., & Hall, D. T. (2004). Calling, new careers and spirituality: A reflective perspective for organizational leaders and professionals. In M. L. Pava & P. Primeaux (Eds.), Spiritual intelligence at work: Meaning, metaphor, and morals (pp. 175–201). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  62. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbery Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wood, A. M., Linley, A. P., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15–19. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4378011.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wrzesniewski, A., McCauley, C. R., Rozin, P., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to their work. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 21–33. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Harzer.

Additional information

The preparation of this paper has been facilitated by a research grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF; PBZHP1_147249) awarded to Claudia Harzer. The authors are thankful to Mareike Gehlhar and Isabelle Hauser for collecting parts of the data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harzer, C., Ruch, W. Your Strengths are Calling: Preliminary Results of a Web-Based Strengths Intervention to Increase Calling. J Happiness Stud 17, 2237–2256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9692-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Positive intervention
  • Character strengths
  • Signature strengths
  • Calling
  • Global life satisfaction