Nussbaum’s Capabilities and Self-Determination Theory’s Basic Psychological Needs: Relating Some Fundamentals of Human Wellness
- 1.4k Downloads
Research and theory concerning the nature and sources of well-being has been undertaken through varied approaches. Two such approaches are the capability approach and self-determination theory (SDT), both of which have postulated specific factors deemed necessary for human well-being and flourishing. In two studies we examine the relations between capabilities and well-being indicators, as well as the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction in these relations. Results indicate that both capabilities and SDT’s basic psychological needs are substantially associated with well-being, and that SDT’s basic needs partially mediate the relation between capabilities and indicators of wellness.
KeywordsWell-being Self-determination theory Capability approach
- Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110. doi: 10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (2005). The relevance of subjective well-being to social policies: Optimal experience and tailored interventions. In F. Huppert, B. Keverne, & N. Baylis (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 379–404). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Friedli, L. (2009). Mental health, resilience and inequalities. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rath, T., & Harter, J. (2010). The economics of wellbeing. New York: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., & Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 95–122. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.1.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., Curren, R. R., & Deci, E. L. (2013). What humans need: Flourishing in aristotelian philosophy and self-determination theory. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 57–75). doi: 10.1037/14092-004.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (Vol. 1, pp. 45–64). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (Vol. 1, pp. 795–849). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2016). Autonomy and autonomy disturbance in self-development and psychopathology: Research on motivation, attachment, and clinical process. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychology (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar