Wellbeing as a Wicked Problem: Navigating the Arguments for the Role of Government
- 1.5k Downloads
Governments in a number of countries have shown increasing interest in seeking to elevate happiness or wellbeing as an explicit policy goal. This interest has led to fierce debates both within and, increasingly, beyond academe about the appropriate role for government in this area. It is difficult to adjudicate between the various arguments surrounding the issue as they often take very different starting points, either metatheoretical or disciplinary. In seeking to steer a course through these arguments we take the distinction between ‘wicked’ and ‘tame’ problems as a reference point, arguing that wellbeing should be categorised as the former. The seminal discussion of this distinction (Rittel and Webber in Policy Sci 4:155–169, 1973) resonates sharply with current debates on wellbeing and indeed is located within similar debates in the past. We argue that understanding wellbeing as a wicked problem steers us towards deliberation and scrutiny as central to the agenda and cautions us against expecting to find a panacea. However, this understanding can take us beyond irresolvable disputes by pointing to the need for pragmatic and legitimate government action. In developing our arguments we ground them mainly in relation to empirical research on developments in the UK, where the connection between wellbeing and public policy is seen as relatively advanced. However, we suggest these arguments apply to other contexts where wellbeing is gaining increasing traction as a potential goal of government policy.
KeywordsWicked problems Tame problems Wellbeing Government Quality of life Measurement
We would like to thank John MackMersh for suggesting the connection between wellbeing and wicked problems and Paul Allin, Karen Scott and the anonymous reviewers for the Journal of Happiness Studies reviewers for their very helpful comments on this article. We would also like thank participants in the ESRC Seminar Series on The Politics of Wellbeing (http://politicsofwellbeing.group.shef.ac.uk/—Grant Ref: ES/L001357/1). Paul Anand would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for its support.
- Austin, A. (2014). Defining and measuring national well-being: are we capable of questioning the hegemony of happiness? Working paper, Oxford: Institute for Social Change, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
- Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (Eds.). (2004). Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Beaumont, J. (2012). Measuring national well-being: Report on consultation responses on proposed domains and measures. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Boelhouwer, J. (2010). Wellbeing in The Netherlands. The SCP life situation index since 1974. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. http://www.scp.nl/english/Publications/Publications_by_year/Publications_2010/Wellbeing_in_the_Netherlands. (Accessed 27 Sept 2014).
- Cameron, D. (2010). PM Speech on Well-Being. Speech given by the Prime Minister, London, 25 November. http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speeches-and-transcripts/2010/11/pm-speech-on-well-being-57569. (Accessed Jan 2011).
- Canadian Index of Wellbeing. (2012). How are Canadians really doing? The 2012 CIW report. Waterloo, ON: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
- CMEPSP. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm (Accessed June 2011).
- Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995). If the GDP is up, Why is America down?, The Atlanta Online, October. http://www.theatlantic.com/past/politics/ecbig/gdp.htm (Accessed Jan 2011).
- Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems, Wiley. http://cognexusgroup.com/about-us2/resources/#book (Accessed 10 Feb 2014).
- Costanza, R., Hart, M., Posner, S., & Talberth, J. (2009). Beyond GDP: The Need for new measures of progress. The Pardee papers, No 4, Boston: Boston University. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/6/42613423.pdf (Accessed June 2011).
- De Jonge, T. (2009). The state of play in measuring SWB in the Netherlands. Paper for the OECD meeting Measuring subjective well-being: an opportunity for National Statistical Offices?, Florence, Italy, 23-24 July 2009. http://www.isqols2009.istitutodeglinnocenti.it/Content_en/Measuring%20SWB%20in%20The%20Netherlands%20v2RGED%20with%20cover%20page.pdf (Accessed 27 Sept 2009).
- De Vos, M. (2012). The unbearable lightness of wellbeing policy. In P. Booth (Ed.), … and the Pursuit of happiness: Wellbeing and the role of government (pp. 181–204). London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. (1973). Does money buy happiness? The Public Interest, 30(Winter), 3–10.Google Scholar
- Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2007). Should national happiness be maximised?. Institute for Empirical Research Institute, University of Zurich Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 306.Google Scholar
- Fujiwara, D., & Campbell, R. (2011). Valuation techniques for social cost-benefit analysis: Stated preference, revealed preference and subjective well-being approaches. A discussion of the current issues. London: HM Treasury, DWP.Google Scholar
- Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Head, B. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101–116.Google Scholar
- HM Government. (2013). Well-being evidence submitted by the government to the environmental audit committee well-being inquiry. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/well-being/
- ISTAT. (2014). BES 2014. http://www.misuredelbenessere.it/fileadmin/upload/Bes___2014_Media_summary.pdf (Accessed 27 Sept 2014).
- Kroll, C. (2011). Measuring progress and well-being: Achievements and challenges of a new global movement. Berlin: International Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
- Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
- Nef. (2012). Nef response: Well-being and the role of government. London: Nef.Google Scholar
- Nef. (2013). New economics foundation evidence to the environmental audit committee inquiry on well-being. http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/environmental-audit-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/well-being/
- OECD. (2012). Highlights and conclusions: 4th OECD world forum on statistics, knowledge and policy measuring well-being for development and policy making. http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforumindia/OECD-World-Forum-2012-India-proceedings.pdf (Accessed 27 Sept 2014).
- ONS. (2011). News release: People asked to rate ‘life satisfaction’ as new well-being questions revealed. London: ONS.Google Scholar
- ONS. (2012a). First ONS annual experimental subjective well-being results. London: ONS.Google Scholar
- ONS. (2012b). Measuring national well-being: Life in the UK, 2012. London: ONS.Google Scholar
- ONS. (2014). Personal well-being in the UK, 2013/14. London: ONS.Google Scholar
- Schon, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Scott, K. (2012). Measuring wellbeing: Towards sustainability?. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- UNDP. (1990). Human development report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wall, I., & Salvaris, M. (2011). Measuring Australia’s progress—An update. OECD Newsletter on Measuring the Progress of Societies, 8, 8–10.Google Scholar