Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: Incremental Prediction from 30 Facets Over the Big 5
This study investigated the relationship between the Big 5, measured at factor and facet levels, and dimensions of both psychological and subjective well-being. Three hundred and thirty-seven participants completed the 30 Facet International Personality Item Pool Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Positive and Negative Affectivity Schedule, and Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being. Cross-correlation decomposition presented a parsimonious picture of how well-being is related to personality factors. Incremental facet prediction was examined using double-adjusted r2 confidence intervals and semi-partial correlations. Incremental prediction by facets over factors ranged from almost nothing to a third more variance explained, suggesting a more modest incremental prediction than presented in the literature previously. Examination of semi-partial correlations controlling for factors revealed a small number of important facet-well-being correlations. All data and R analysis scripts are made available in an online repository.
KeywordsSubjective well-being Psychological well-being Personality Big 5 Personality facets
- Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Apley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–305). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five factor inventory: professional manual (Vol. 396). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2, 179–198.Google Scholar
- Diener, E. (Ed.). (2009). Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Vol. 38). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7–28.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Headey, B., & Wearing, A. J. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
- Inquisit 3.0 [Computer software]. (2012). Seattle: Millisecond Software.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & J. P. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Johnson, J. A. (2000). Web-based personality assessment: Project description and rationale. Paper presented at the 71st annual meeting of the eastern psychological association, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
- Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Subjective well-being. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 471–484). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Soto, C. J. (2014). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the Big Five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.12081.