Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 767–788 | Cite as

From Positive Orientation to Job performance: The Role of Work Engagement and Self-efficacy Beliefs

  • Guido Alessandri
  • Laura Borgogni
  • Wilmar B. Schaufeli
  • Gian Vittorio Caprara
  • Chiara Consiglio
Research Paper

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the validity of a conceptual model that explains the mechanisms linking positive orientation (P-OR) to future job performance in a sample of 388 male security agents. The relationship between P-OR and job performance as rated by three supervisors, each with different responsibilities with respect to the participants, was examined via the company’s performance appraisal tool. In particular, this study investigated whether the relationship between P-OR and job performance is mediated by work engagement and moderated by levels of work self-efficacy beliefs. Results were consistent with predictions made from the conceptual model in that work engagement partially mediated the relation between P-OR and job performance. This was particularly the case when work self-efficacy beliefs were high or medium, but not when work self-efficacy beliefs were low. Likewise, P-OR exerted a residual direct effect on job performance when work self-efficacy beliefs were high or medium, but not when they were low. Overall, the findings demonstrated that work engagement and work self-efficacy beliefs refer to key mechanisms turning POS into job performance.

Keywords

Work engagement Positive orientation Self-efficacy beliefs Moderated mediation Job performance 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., & Tisak, J. (2012a). Further explorations on the unique contribution of positive orientation to optimal functioning. European Psychologist, 17, 44–54. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., & Tisak, J. (2012b). A unified latent curve, latent state-trait analysis of the developmental trajectories and correlates of positive orientation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 341–368. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.673954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Tisak, J., DeIana, G., Caria S., Caprara, G.V. (2012). The utility of positive orientation in predicting job performance and organizational citizenship behaviors. Applied Psychology: An International Review. doi:  10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00511.x.
  5. Anderson, K. W., & Skidmore, J. R. (1995). Empirical analysis of factors in depressive cognition: The Cognitive Triad Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 603–609. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199509)51:5<603:AID-JCLP2270510504>3.0.CO;2-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Bakker, A. B. (2010). Engagement and “job crafting”: Engaged employees create their own great place to work. In S. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 229–244). Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Bakker, A. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 265–269. doi: 10.1177/0963721411414534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147–154. doi: 10.1002/job.515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  15. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bebbington, P. (1985). Three cognitive theories of depression. Psychological Medicine, 15, 759–769. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700004992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Borgogni, L., Petitta, L., Steca, P. (2001). Efficacia personale e collettiva nei contesti organizzativi[Personal and collective self-efficacy beliefs in organizational contexts. In G.V. Caprara (a cura di), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia [Self-efficacy Assessment]. Trento, Erickson.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, J. D., & Dutton, K. A. (1995). The thrill of victory, the complexity of defeat: Self-esteem and people’s emotional reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 712–722. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cameron, K., & Caza, A. (2004). Contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 731–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., & Barbaranelli, C. (2010a). Optimal functioning: Contribution of self-efficacy beliefs to positive orientation. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79, 328–330. doi: 10.1159/000319532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caprara, G., Alessandri, G., & Eisenberg, N. (2012a). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values and self efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1289–1303. doi: 10.1037/a0025626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Eisenberg, N., Kupfer, A., Steca, P., Caprara, M. G., et al. (2012b). The positivity scale. Psychological Assessment, 24, 701–712. doi: 10.1037/a0026681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Trommsdorff, G., Heikamp, T., Yamaguchi, S., & Suzuki, F. (2012c). Positive orientation across countries. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 43, 77–83. doi: 10.1177/0022022111422257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Caprara, G. V., Fagnani, C., Alessandri, G., Steca, P., Gigantesco, A., Sforza, L. L. C., et al. (2009). Human optimal functioning: The genetics of positive orientation towards self, life, and the future. Behaviour Genetics, 39, 277–284. doi: 10.1007/s10519-009-9267-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Alessandri, G., Abela, J. R. Z., & McWhinnie, C. M. (2010b). Positive orientation: explorations on what is common to life satisfaction, self-esteem, and optimism. Epidemiologia e psichiatria Sociale, 19, 63–71. doi: 10.1017/S1121189X00001615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen, G., Casper, W. J., & Cortina, J. M. (2001). The roles of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and work-related performance: A meta-analytic examination. Human Performance, 14, 209–230. doi: 10.1207/S15327043HUP1403_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Consiglio, C., Borgogni, L., Alessandri, G., & Schaufeli, W. (2013). Does self efficacy matter for burnout and absenteeism? The mediating role of demands and resources at the individual and team levels. Work & Stress, 27(1), 22–42. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2013.769325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. DeLuga, R. J., & Mason, S. (2000). Relationship of resident assistant conscientiousness, extraversion, and positive affect with rated performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 225–235. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Demerouti, E., & Cropanzano, R. (2010). From thought to action: Employee engagement and job performance. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 147–163). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  31. Haaga, D. A., Dick, M. J., & Ernst, D. (1991). Empirical status of cognitive theory of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 215–236. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Wheeler, A. R. (2008). The relative role of engagement and embeddedness in prediction job performance and turnover intention. Work & Stress, 22, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 139–164. doi: 10.1177/014662168500900204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture and community. The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hobfoll, S. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptations. Review of General Psychology, 6, 302–324. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, J. E., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss, resources gain and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 632–643. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349–361. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jex, S. M., Bliese, P. D., Buzzell, S., & Primeau, J. (2001). The impact of self-efficacy on stressor–strain relations: Coping style as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 401–409. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. In J. Neyman & E. S. Pearson (Eds.), Statistical research memoirs (Vol. 1, pp. 57–93). Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167–187. doi: 10.1177/0018726710371236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Kluemper, D., Little, L., & DeGroot, T. (2009). State or trait: Effects of state optimism on job-related outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 209–231. doi: 10.1002/job.591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: State of the art. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  48. Locke, E. A., McClear, K., & Knight, D. (1996). Self-esteem and work. International Review of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 11, 1–32.Google Scholar
  49. Lu, L., Chang, Y., & Lai, S. Y. (2011). What Differentiates success from strain: The moderating effects of self-efficacy. International Journal of Stress Management, 18, 396–412. doi: 10.1037/a0025122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143–160. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Macey, W. H., Schneider, B., Barbera, K., & Young, S. A. (2009). Employee engagement: Tools for analysis, practice, and competitive advantage. London, England: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparisons of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of products and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 764–773. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  58. McIntosh, C. N., & Fischer, D. G. (2000). Beck’s cognitive triad: One versus three factors. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 153–157. doi: 10.1037/h0087110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nelson, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2007). Positive organizational behavior: Accentuating the positive at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Oh, I. S., & Berry, C. M. (2009). The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: Validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1498–1513. doi: 10.1037/a0017221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Olés, P., Alessandri, G., Olés, M., Bąk, W., Jankowski, T., Łaguna, M. & Caprara, G. V. (2012). Positive orientation and generalized self-efficacy. Studia Psychologica, 2012. Google Scholar
  62. Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P., Schaufeli, W. B., & Van Wijhe, C. (2012). Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement. Human Relations, 65, 1129–1154. doi: 10.1177/0018726711429382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N., Shiner, R. N., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 2, 313–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robie, C., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 157–169. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Salanova, M., Peirò, J. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2002). Self-efficacy specificity and burnout among information technology workers: An extension of the job demands-control model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 1–25. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). Job resources, engagement and proactive behaviour. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 116–131. doi: 10.1080/014492900750000081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. S. K. (2002). Dispositional similarity, group homogeneity and organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1120–1136. doi: 10.2307/3069428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schaubroeck, J., & Merritt, D. E. (1997). Divergent effects of job control on coping with work stressors: The key role of self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 738–754. doi: 10.2307/257061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES—Utrecht work engagement scale: Test manual. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Psychology, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  72. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I., Marques-Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002a). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464–481. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033005003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002b). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Seligman, M. E. P., & Schulman, P. (1986). Explanatory style as a predictor of productivity and quitting among life insurance sales agents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 832–838. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  78. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240–261. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sweetman, D., & Luthans, F. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 54–68). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  80. Turner, R. J., Taylor, J., & Van Gundy, K. (2004). Personal resources and depression in the transition to adulthood: Ethnic comparisons. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 34–52. doi: 10.1177/002214650404500103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wright, T. A. (2003). Positive organizational behavior: An idea whose time has truly come. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 437–442. doi: 10.1002/job.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 84–94. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121–141. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009a). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009b). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200. doi: 10.1348/096317908X285633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resiliency. Journal of Management, 33, 774–800. doi: 10.1177/0149206307305562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Alessandri
    • 1
  • Laura Borgogni
    • 1
  • Wilmar B. Schaufeli
    • 2
  • Gian Vittorio Caprara
    • 1
  • Chiara Consiglio
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySapienza, University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations