Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 223–235 | Cite as

Personal Resilience in Times of Crisis: The Implications of SWB Homeostasis and Set-Points

Research Paper


Our companion paper (Cummins et al. in J Happiness Stud, 2013) describes the statistical process used to demonstrate set-points and set-point-ranges for subjective wellbeing. The implications of set-points and homeostasis are now considered in the context of resilience. This discussion leads with a brief overview of resilience definitions and is followed by a description of subjective wellbeing (SWB) homeostasis. This addresses, in particular, the issue of SWB malleability under homeostatic control. The link between resources and resilience is then considered, in terms of predictions made by homeostasis theory. Finally, discussion focuses on the implications of such understanding for future directions in SWB research. It is concluded that an understanding of set-points and homeostasis allows new insights into the resilience construct.


Subjective wellbeing Homeostasis HPMood 


  1. Antonovsky, A. (1979). Health, stress, and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2002). Resilience in midwestern families: Selected findings from the first decade of a prospective, longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A. (2012). The relationship between subjective wellbeing and health. In M. L. Caltabiano & L. A. Ricciardelli (Eds.), Applied topics in health psychology (pp. 101–111). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A. (2013). Subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In: D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0167.
  11. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, R. A., Hughes, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., Woerner, J., & Lai, L. (2007). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 17.1 The Wellbeing of Australians—Carer Health and Wellbeing. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  13. Cummins, R. A., Hammond, T., & Campbell, P. (2012a). Carers Counselling Intervention Study–Volume 2. Melbourne: Australian centre on quality of life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. ISBN 978-1-74156-162–3.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. D. L., & Davern, M. (2012b). Subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In K. C. Land, A. Michalos, & J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality-of-life studies (Vol. I, pp. 79–98)., Theoretical and methodological foundations New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., Hartley-Clark, L., Perera, C., & Horfiniak, K. C. (2012c). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 28.0-The Wellbeing of Australians—The impact of marriage. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from
  16. Cummins, R. A., Li, L., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2013). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies,. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9444-9.Google Scholar
  17. Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and well-being, 3(1), 1–43. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x.Google Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). The validity of life satisfaction measures. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engel, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Impact of dose adjustment for normal eating in Australia (OzDAFNE) on subjective wellbeing, coping resources and negative affects in adults with type 1 diabetes: A prospective comparison study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 91, 271–279. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.11.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ensel, W. M., & Lin, N. (1991). The life stress paradigm and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernández-Rios, L., & Novo, M. (2012). Positive psychology: Zeigeist (or spirit of the times) or ignorance (or disinformation) of history? International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(2), 333–344.Google Scholar
  25. Flach, F. (1988). Resilience: Discovering a new strength at times of stress. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
  26. Forgas, J. P. (2008). The strange cognitive benefits of mild dysphoria: On the evolutionary advantages of not being too happy. In J. P. Forgas, M. G. Haselton, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 107–121). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  27. Graham, L., & Oswald, A. J. (2010). Hedonic capital, adaptation and resilience. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(2), 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton, C. (2006) What’s left? The death of social democracy. Quarterly Essay, Vol. 21. Melbourne: Black Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  30. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lai, L. C. H., & Cummins, R. A. (2012). The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defence of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research,. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9991-6.Google Scholar
  32. Luthar, S. S., & Zelazo, L. B. (2003). Research on resilience: An integrative review. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 511–549). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macmillan Dictionary. (2012). Retrieved Oct 25, 2012, from
  34. Mahoney, M. J. (1991). Human change processes: The scientific foundations of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 921–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Masten, A. S., & Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favourable and unfavourable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist, 53, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merriam-Webster. (2012). Retrieved October 25, 2012, from
  38. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterson, S. J., Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., & Thatcher, R. W. (2008). Neuroscientific implications of psychological capital: Are the brains of optimistic, hopeful, confident, and resilient leaders different? Organisational Dynamics, 37, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramanathan, D. M., Wardecker, B. M., Slocomb, J. E., & Hillary, F. G. (2011). Dispositional optimism and outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 25(4), 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1–28). doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1.
  44. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realise your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, S. E., & Stanton, A. L. (2007). Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson, S. C., Armstrong, W., & Thoman, C. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: A control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 897–914. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomyn, A. J., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2013). Intervention efficacy among ‘at risk’ adolescents: A test of Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis Theory. Social Indicators Research.Google Scholar
  51. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1997). The emergence of dynamical social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vitterso, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002). The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: Once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Werner, E. E. (1995). Resilience in development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, S., & Ferch, S. (2005). Enhancing resilience in the workplace through the practice of caring relationships. Organisation Development Journal, 23, 45–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social ResearchUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations