Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1197–1217 | Cite as

Subjective Well-Being Capabilities: Bridging the Gap Between the Capability Approach and Subjective Well-Being Research

  • Martin Binder
Research Paper

Abstract

As a result of the disenchantment with traditional income-based measures of welfare, alternative welfare measures have gained increasing attention in recent years. Two of the most prominent measures of well-being come from subjective well-being research and the (objective) capability approach. Despite their promising features, both approaches have a number of weaknesses when considered on their own. This paper sets out to examine to what extent a fusion between both approaches can overcome the weaknesses of both individual approaches. It uses features of the capability framework to enrich what is basically a subjective well-being perspective. Key drawbacks of normative subjective well-being views can be overcome by focussing welfare assessments on “Subjective Well-being Capabilities”, i.e. focussing on the substantive opportunities of individuals to pursue and achieve happiness.

Keywords

Subjective well-being Capability approach Policy-making Normative economics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the ESRC-TSB-BIS-NESTA as part of the ES/J008427/1 grant on Skills, Knowledge, Innovation, Policy and Practice (SKIPPY). The author wishes to express his thanks to an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions. The usual caveat applies.

References

  1. Adler, M. D. (2007). Well-being, inequality and time: The time-slice problem and its policy implications. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  2. Algom, D., & Lubel, S. (1994). Psychophysics in the field: Perception and memory for labor pain. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(2), 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand, P., & Clark, A. E. (2006). Symposium introduction: Life satisfaction and welfare economics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anand, P., & Van Hees, M. (2006). Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 268–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., Guala, F., & Van Hees, M. (2009). The development of capability indicators. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1), 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anand, P., Hunter, G., & Smith, R. (2005). Capabilities and well-being: Evidence based on the Sen-Nussbaum approach to welfare. Social Indicators Research, 74, 9–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anand, P., Krishnakumar, J., & Tran, N. B. (2011). Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(3–4), 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anand, P., Santos, C., & Smith, R. (2008). The measurement of capabilities. In K. Basu, & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Arguments for a better world: Essays in honor of Amartya Sen (Vol. 1, chapter 16, pp. 283–310). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Angner, E. (2010). Subjective well-being. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Binder, M. (2010). Elements of an evolutionary theory of welfare. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Binder, M. (2013). Innovativeness and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 111(2), 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Binder, M., & Broekel, T. (2011). Applying a robust non-parametric efficiency analysis to measure conversion efficiency in Great Britain. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(2), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Binder, M., & Broekel, T. (2012). Happiness no matter the cost? An examination on how efficiently individuals reach their happiness levels. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(4), 621–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2011a). Disentangling the circularity in Sen’s capability approach—An analysis of the co-evolution of functioning achievement and resources. Social Indicators Research, 103(3), 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2011b). From Average Joe’s happiness to Miserable Jane and Cheerful John: Using quantile regressions to analyze the full subjective well-being distribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 79(3), 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Binder, M., & Coad, A. (2013). Capability, functioning and resources. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Binder, M., & Witt, U. (2011). As innovations drive economic growth, do they also raise well-being? Papers on Economics & Evolution, #1105, 1–19.Google Scholar
  18. Binder, M., & Witt, U. (2012). A critical note on the role of the capability approach for sustainability economics. Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(5), 721–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bleys, B. (2012). Beyond GDP: Classifying alternative measures for progress. Social Indicators Research, 109(3), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brandolini, A., & D’Alessio, G. (2009). Measuring well-being in the functioning space. In E. Chiappero-Martinetti (Ed.), Debating Global Society—Reach and limits of the capability approach (pp. 91–156). Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  22. Bruelde, B. (2007). Happiness theories of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8, 15–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cabanac, M. (1979). Sensory pleasure. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 54(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: The common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Canoy, M., Lerais, F., & Schokkaert, E. (2010). Applying the capability approach to policy-making: The impact assessment of the eu-proposal on organ donation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chiappero-Martinetti, E., & Salardi, P. (2007). Well-being process and conversion factors: An estimation of the micro-side of the well-being process. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  28. Comim, F. (2005). Capabilities and happiness: Potential synergies. Review of Social Economy, 63(2), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  30. Deutsch, J., Ramos, X., & Silber, J. (2003). Poverty and inequality of standard of living and quality of life in Great Britain. In M. J. Sirgy, D. Rahtz, & A. C. Samli, (Eds.), Advances in quality-of-life theory and research (chapter 7, pp. 99–128). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money—Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. Office for National Statistics, February 2011.Google Scholar
  34. Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2008). Measuring well-being for public policy: Preferences or experiences? Journal of Legal Studies, 37(2), S5–S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 1029–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and public choice. Public Choice, 144(3), 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2012). The use of happiness research for public policy. Social Choice and Welfare, 38(4), 659–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gasper, D. (2010). Understanding the diversity of conceptions of well-being and quality of life. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Graham, C. (2009). Happiness around the world. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Graham, C. (2011). The pursuit of happiness. Washington, D.C: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  44. Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2009). Well-being and public attitudes in Afghanistan: Some insights from the economics of happiness. Brookings Working Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
  45. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2005). Variance in obesity across cohorts and countries: A norms-based explanation using happiness surveys. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  46. Headey, B. (2010). The set point theory of well-being has serious flaws: On the eve of a scientific revolution? Social Indicators Research, 97, 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Helliwell, J. F., & Wang, S. (2012). The state of world happiness. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report (chapter 2). New York: The Earth Institute.Google Scholar
  48. Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (2001). Clusters of attributes and well-being in the USA. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., & Slottje, D. J. (2001). The environment and the quality of life in the United States over time. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16(6), 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1833–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach—Theoretical insights and empirical applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness—Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  54. Layard, R. (2010). Measuring subjective well-being. Science, 327(5965), 534–535.Google Scholar
  55. Layard, R., Clark, A. E., Senik, C. (2012). The causes of happiness and misery. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report (chapter 3, pp. 58–90). New York: The Earth Institute.Google Scholar
  56. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McClure, S. M., York, M. K., & Montague, P. R. (2004). The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: The modern role of fMRI. The Neuroscientist, 10(3), 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Michalos, A. C. (2011). What did Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi get right and what did they get wrong? Social Indicators Research, 102, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Millenson, J. (1967). Principles of Behavioral Analysis. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  60. Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Qizilbash, M. (2002). Development, common foes and shared values. Review of Political Economy, 14(4), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Qizilbash, M. (2012). Utilitarianism, ‘adaptation’ and paternalism. In D. A. Clark, (Ed.), Adaptation, poverty and development: The dynamics of subjective well-being (chapter 2, pp. 35–60). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schokkaert, E. (2007). Capabilities and satisfaction with life. Journal of Human Development, 8(3), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schubert, C. (2012). Pursuing happiness: Can ‘happiness politics’ promote civil virtues? Kyklos, 65(2), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schubert, C., & Binder, M. (2013). Reconciling normative and behavioral economics: Applying the ‘naturalistic approach’ to the adaptation problem. Journal of Economics and Statistics (in press).Google Scholar
  69. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (chapter 4, pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  70. Sen, A. K. (1984). Resources, values and development. Cambridge/Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Sen, A. K. (1985a). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  72. Sen, A. K. (1985b). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sen, A. K. (1987). On ethics & economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  74. Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  75. Sen, A. K. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum, & A. K. Sen (Eds.), The Quality of Life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Slesnick, D. T. (1998). Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 2108–2165.Google Scholar
  77. Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). The Stiglitz report. New York/London: The New Press.Google Scholar
  78. Sugden, R. (1993). Welfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of inequality reexamined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic Literature, 31(4), 1947–1962.Google Scholar
  79. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sumner, L. W. (2006). Utility and capability. Utilitas, 18(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Hoorn, A., Mabsout, R., & Sent, E.-M. (2010). Happiness and capability: Introduction to the symposium. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. van Praag, B. M. S. (1991). Ordinal and cardinal utility: An integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept. Journal of Econometrics, 50(12), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Veenhoven, R. (2010). Greater happiness for a greater number. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting—Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Witt, U. (2001). Learning to consume—A theory of wants and the growth of demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SPRUUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.Evolutionary Economics GroupMax Planck Institute of EconomicsJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations