Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 693–715 | Cite as

Measuring Search for Meaning: A Factor-Analytic Evaluation of the Seeking of Noetic Goals Test (SONG)

  • Stefan E. Schulenberg
  • Brandy J. Baczwaski
  • Erin M. Buchanan
Research Paper


This study’s primary purpose was to examine the factor structure of the 20-item Seeking of Noetic Goals (SONG) test via exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic procedures. An additional objective was to report on the measure’s incremental validity in comparison to the Search scale of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), an alternative measure of search for meaning. This study utilized data from three samples of American undergraduates (N = 908) from a medium-sized southern university. Factor analysis supported a two-factor model of the SONG, with patterns of correlation further suggesting the measure assesses distinct constructs. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated similar scale structure and item answering in terms of gender. Overall, the first factor yielded reliable scores that correlated significantly and in the expected direction with measures of well-being and psychological distress. The second factor did not yield reliable scores nor did it correlate significantly with many of the other measures administered. However, both factors were shown to significantly predict scores from measures of depression and general psychological distress after controlling for MLQ Search scale scores. We consider the data with respect to SONG scoring and interpretation, and discuss implications of these data for future research.


Logotherapy Search for meaning Factor analysis Psychometrics Seeking of Noetic Goals test Meaning in Life Questionnaire Positive psychology 


  1. Baczwaski, B. J. (2011). A measure of interest to logotherapy researchers: The Seeking of Noetic Goals test. The International Forum for Logotherapy, 34, 113–114.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey-Richardson, B. (1985). Review of the Seeking of Noetic Goals test. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (Vol. II) (pp. 1338–1339). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (in press). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. Journal of Positive Psychology. Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Brunelli, C., Bianchi, E., Murru, L., Monformoso, P., Bosisio, M., Gangeri, L., et al. (2012). Italian validation of the Purpose in Life (PIL) test and the Seeking of Noetic Goals test (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20, 2775–2783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  11. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1998). A bootstrap procedure for testing the statistical significance of goodness-of-fit indices in structural equations models. Paper presented to the Research Methods Division of the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.Google Scholar
  15. Crumbaugh, J. C. (1977a). Manual of instructions: The Seeking of Noetic Goals test (SONG). Abilene, TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy.Google Scholar
  16. Crumbaugh, J. C. (1977b). The Seeking of Noetic Goals test (SONG): A complementary scale to the Purpose in Life test (PIL). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 900–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crumbaugh, J. C. (1988). Everything to gain: A guide to self-fulfillment through logoanalysis. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Logotherapy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl’s concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 200–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crumbaugh, J. C., & Maholick, L. T. (1969). Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Abilene, TX: Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy.Google Scholar
  20. Delle Fave, A., Wissing, M., Brdar, I., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Freire, T. (2013). Cross-cultural perceptions of meaning and goals in adulthood: Their roots and relations with happiness. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 227–247). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duffy, R. D., & Raque-Bogdan, T. L. (2010). The motivation to serve others: Exploring relations to career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dyck, M. J. (1987). Assessing logotherapeutic constructs: Conceptual and psychometric status of the Purpose in Life and Seeking of Noetic Goals tests. Clinical Psychology Review, 7, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fabry, J. (1988). Guideposts to meaning: Discovering what really matters. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  26. Fjelland, J. E., Barron, C. R., & Foxall, M. (2008). A review of instruments measuring two aspects of meaning: Search for meaning and meaning in illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 394–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frankl, V. E. (1959/1985). Man’s search for meaning (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  28. Frankl, V. E. (2010). In A. Batthyany (Ed.), The feeling of meaninglessness: A challenge to psychotherapy and philosophy. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Guttmann, D. (1996). Logotherapy for the helping professional: Meaningful social work. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Haynes, S. N., Smith, G. T., & Hunsley, J. D. (2011). Scientific foundations of clinical assessment. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hofmans, J., Pepermans, R., & Loix, E. (2009). Measurement invariance matters: A case made for the ORTOFIN. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 465–497). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hutzell, R. R. (1987). Seeking of Noetic Goals (SONG) test. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Test critiques: VI (pp. 486–490). Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.Google Scholar
  36. Hutzell, R. R. (1990). An introduction to logotherapy. In P. A. Keller & S. R. Heyman (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book (Vol. 9, pp. 145–152). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.Google Scholar
  37. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources.Google Scholar
  38. Kashdan, T. B., & Breen, W. E. (2007). Materialism and diminished well-being: Experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klinger, E. (2012). The search for meaning in evolutionary goal-theory perspective and its clinical implications. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 23–56). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  41. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umpress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, G. M., et al. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45.2. USA: American Credentialing Services.Google Scholar
  42. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). The how of happiness: A scientific approach to getting the life you want. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). The myths of happiness: What should make you happy, but doesn’t. What shouldn’t make you happy, but does. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  45. McDonald, M. J., Wong, P. T. P., & Gingras, D. T. (2012). Meaning-in-life measures and development of a brief version of the Personal Meaning Profile. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 357–382). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  46. Melton, A. M. A., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2008). On the measurement of meaning: Logotherapy’s empirical contributions to humanistic psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist, 36, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moreland, K. L. (1985). Review of Seeking of Noetic Goals test. In J. V. Mitchell Jr. (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1339–1340). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.Google Scholar
  48. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  49. Park, C. L., Mills, M. A., & Edmondson, D. (2010a). PTSD as meaning violation: Testing a cognitive worldview perspective. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
  50. Park, N., Park, M., & Peterson, C. (2010b). When is the search for meaning related to life satisfaction? Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2, 1–13.Google Scholar
  51. Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2012). Character strengths and the life of meaning. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 277–295). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  52. Pöhlmann, K., Gruss, B., & Joraschky, P. (2006). Structural properties of personal meaning systems: A new approach to measuring meaning of life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reker, G. T., & Cousins, J. B. (1979). Factor structure, construct validity and reliability of the Seeking of Noetic Goals (SONG) and Purpose in Life (PIL) tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schulenberg, S. E. (2003). Empirical research and logotherapy. Psychological Reports, 93, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schulenberg, S. E. (2004). A psychometric investigation of logotherapy measures and the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 477–492.Google Scholar
  58. Schulenberg, S. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2009). An exploratory factor analysis of the Seeking of Noetic Goals test (SONG). In A. Batthyany & J. Levinson (Eds.), Existential psychotherapy of meaning: Handbook of logotherapy and existential analysis (pp. 503–511). Phoenix, AZ: Zeig, Tucker & Theisen.Google Scholar
  59. Schulenberg, S. E., Hutzell, R. R., Nassif, C., & Rogina, J. M. (2008). Logotherapy for clinical practice. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45, 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schulenberg, S. E., & Melton, A. M. A. (2010). A confirmatory factor-analytic evaluation of the Purpose in Life test: Preliminary psychometric support for a replicable two-factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulenberg, S. E., Schnetzer, L. W., & Buchanan, E. M. (2011a). The Purpose in Life test-short form: Development and psychometric support. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 861–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schulenberg, S. E., Strack, K. M., & Buchanan, E. M. (2011b). The Meaning in life Questionnaire: Psychometric properties with individuals with serious mental illness in an inpatient setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 1210–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sink, C. A., van Keppel, J., & Purcell, M. (1998). Reliability estimates of the Purpose in Life and Seeking of Noetic Goals tests with rural and metropolitan area adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steger, M. F. (2006). An illustration of issues in factor extraction and identification of dimensionality in psychological assessment data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steger, M. F. (2012). Experiencing meaning in life. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 165–184). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  68. Steger, M. F. (2013). Wrestling with our better selves: The search for meaning in life. In K. D. Markman, T. Proulx, & M. J. Lindberg (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 215–233). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., Sullivan, B. A., & Lorentz, D. (2008a). Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning. Journal of Personality, 76, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steger, M. F., Kawabata, Y., Shimai, S., & Otake, K. (2008b). The meaningful life in Japan and the United States: Levels and correlates of meaning in life. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 660–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steger, M. F., Mann, J. R., Michels, P., & Cooper, T. C. (2009). Meaning in life, anxiety, depression, and general health among smoking cessation patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 67, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Steger, M. F., Pickering, N. K., Shin, J. Y., & Dik, B. J. (2010). Calling in work: Secular or sacred? Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Whittington, B. L., & Scher, S. J. (2010). Prayer and subjective well-being: An examination of six different types of prayer. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wong, P. T. P. (2012a). Introduction: A roadmap for meaning research and applications. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (2nd ed., pp. xxix–xlvi). Routledge: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  79. Wong, P. T. P. (2012b). The meaning mindset: Measurement and implications. International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy, 4, 1–3.Google Scholar
  80. Wong, P. T. P. (in press). Viktor Frankl’s meaning seeking model and contemporary positive psychology. In A. Batthyany & P. Russo-Netzer (Eds.), Meaning in positive and existential psychology. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  81. Yarnell, T. (1972). Validation of the Seeking of Noetic Goals test with schizophrenic and normal ss. Psychological Reports, 30, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan E. Schulenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  • Brandy J. Baczwaski
    • 1
  • Erin M. Buchanan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of Mississippi, UniversityMSUSA
  2. 2.University of Mississippi Clinical-Disaster Research Center (UM-CDRC), UniversityMSUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyMissouri State UniversitySpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations