A Demonstration of Set-Points for Subjective Wellbeing
- 1.3k Downloads
This paper presents evidence for the existence of ‘set-points’ for subjective wellbeing. Our results derive from a 10-year longitudinal study in which subjective wellbeing has been measured using a single question of general life satisfaction. The process of data analysis is driven by logic based on the theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis. This analysis involves the iterative elimination of raw data, from 7,356 individual respondents, based on confidence limits. All results are projected onto a 0–100 point scale. We demonstrate evidence for the existence of set-points lying between 71 and 90 points, with an average set-point-range of 18–20 points for each person. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed.
KeywordsSubjective wellbeing Homeostasis Set-points Genetic
The research reported on in this paper has been supported, in part, by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (#DP1095497) and uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (FaHCSIA) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and view reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to FaHCSIA or the Melbourne Institute. We thank Ann-Marie James for her assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. We also thank Robert Connor and Linda Hartley-Clark for their suggestions regarding the text.
- Block, J. (1981). Some enduring and consequential structures of personality. In A. I. Rabin, J. Aronoff, A. M. Barclay, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), Further explorations in personality (pp. 27–43). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brim, G., & Kagan, J. (1980). Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1984). Personality as a lifelong determinant of wellbeing. In C. Z. Malatesta & C. E. Izard (Eds.), Emotion in adult development (pp. 141–157). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Gibson, A., Lai, L., Weinberg, M., & Collard, J. (2008). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 19.0. In The wellbeing of Australians—Links with exercise, nicotine and alcohol. Retrieved September 26, 2012, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
- Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Hartley-Clark, L., Perera, C., Collard, J., & Horfiniak, K. C. (2011). Australian unity wellbeing index—Report 26.0. In The wellbeing of Australians—chronic health. Retrieved September 26, 2012, from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.
- Cummins, R. A., & Wooden, M. (in press). Resilience in times of crisis: The implications of SWB homeostasis and set-points. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9481-4.
- Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
- Sailer, R. C. (1931). Happiness self-estimates of young men. Teachers College Contribution to Education, 467.Google Scholar
- Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2002). The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey: Wave 1 Survey Methodology HILDA Project Technical Paper Series No. 1/02. Retrieved from Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2012). The HILDA Survey: A case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(3), 369–381.Google Scholar
- Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Wortman, C., & Silver, R. (1982). Coping with undesirable life events. In paper presented at the 90th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar