When Romantic Partners’ Goals Conflict: Effects on Relationship Quality and Subjective Well-Being
- 1.2k Downloads
Most studies have explored goal pursuit from an intraindividual perspective; however, it is becoming increasingly clear that people’s relationships influence many aspects of goal pursuit (Fitzsimons and Finkel in Curr Direct Psychol Sci 19(2):101–105, 2010). The current study examined the influence of goal conflict between romantic partners on relationship quality and the subjective well-being of the partners. In a sample of 105 dating couples (N = 210) both partners provided ratings of their subjective well-being, relationship quality, and the degree of conflict they experience when trying to pursue their goals. Structural equation modeling was used to conduct dyadic analyses on the variables. Results showed that both partners’ reports of higher goal conflict were directly associated with lower relationship quality and lower subjective well-being. Lower relationship quality was, in turn, also associated with lower subjective well-being. Furthermore, one partner’s report of goal conflict was indirectly related to the other partner’s subjective well-being through relationship quality. These findings indicate that relational influences on goal pursuit have implications not only for goal pursuit but also for well-being and relationship quality.
KeywordsGoal conflict Goal pursuit Interdependence theory Romantic relationships Relationship quality Subjective well-being
This research was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council standard research grant awarded to Ulrich Schimmack.
- Diener, M. L., & Diener McGavran, M. B. (2008). What makes people happy? A developmental approach to the literature on family relationships and well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 347–375). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of ultimate concerns: Motivation and spirituality in personality. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Gere, J., & MacDonald, G. (2010). An update of the empirical case for the need to belong. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 66(1), 93–115.Google Scholar
- Impett, E. A., & Gordon, A. M. (2008). For the good of others: Toward a positive psychology of sacrifice. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people (pp. 79–100). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
- Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations. A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- King, L. A. (2008). Interventions for enhancing subjective well-being: Can we make people happier and should we? In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 431–448). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). MPlus 5. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Rafaeli, E., Cranford, J. A., Green, A. S., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2008). The good and bad of relationships: How social hindrance and social support affect relationship feelings in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1703–1718. doi: 10.1177/0146167208323742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1989). Inter-personalism: Toward a goal-based theory of persons in relationships. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 413–472). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar