Skip to main content
Log in

Aspirations, Attainments, and Satisfaction: Life Cycle Differences Between American Women and Men

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aspirations, along with attainments, play an important role in shaping well-being. Early in adult life women are more likely than men to fulfill their material goods and family life aspirations; their satisfaction in these domains is correspondingly higher; and so too is their overall happiness. Material goods aspirations refer here to desires for a number of big-ticket consumer goods, such as a home, car, travel abroad and vacation home. In later life these gender differences turn around. Men come closer than women to fulfilling their material goods and family life aspirations, are more satisfied with their financial situation and family life, and are the happier of the two genders. An important factor underlying the turnaround in fulfillment of aspirations for material goods and family life is probably the shift over the course of the life cycle in the relative proportion of women and men in marital and non-marital unions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1972). Aspirations, satisfaction, and fulfillment. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 441–466). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328. doi:10.1007/BF00292050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2005). General Social Survey, 1972–2004 [CUMULATIVE FILE] [Computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. Publication from Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer], 2005. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research/Berkeley, CA: Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program (http://sda.berkeley.edu), University of California [distributors].

  • de la Croix, D. (1998). Growth and the relativity of satisfaction. Mathematical Social Sciences, 100(36), 105–125. doi:10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00009-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1987). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Life cycle welfare: Trends and differences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1011504817292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2004). The reluctant economist: Perspectives on economics, economic history, and demography. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A., & Sawangfa, O. (2006). Happiness and domain satisfaction: Theory and evidence. Paper presented at the Conference on New Directions in the Study of Happiness, University of Notre Dame.

  • Fields, J. (2003). America’s families and living arrangements: 2003. Current Population Reports. Series P-28, Special Censuses, P20-553. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J. Mc. V. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, S. (1996). Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1293–1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes on well-being. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 239–249. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelli, E. A., & Easterlin, R. A. (2007). The X-relation: Life cycle happiness of American women and men. Unpublished manuscript

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancy theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413. doi:10.1007/BF00333288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1991). Global report on student well-being. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591. doi:10.1086/229030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M. (2007). The complexity of well-being: A life satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: Form theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, N., & Muñoz Sastre, M. T. (2001). Appraisal of life: “Area” versus “Dimension” conceptualizations. Social Indicators Research, 53, 229–255. doi:10.1023/A:1007160616388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, W. E., Veenhoven, R., Scherpenzeel, A. C., & Bunting, B. (Eds.). (1995). A comparative study of satisfaction with life in Europe. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, L., & Sevak, P. (2006). Gender, marriage, and asset accumulation in the United States. Feminist Economics, 12(1–2), 139–166. doi:10.1080/13545700500508445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1964). Level of aspiration and decision making. In A. H. Brayfield & S. Messick (Eds.), Decision and choice: Contributions of Sidney Siegel. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, E. C., Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Wanting, having, and satisfaction: Examining the role of desire discrepancies in satisfaction with income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 725–734. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32(4), 483–507. doi:10.2307/2061670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are grateful for financial support to the University of Southern California.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anke C. Plagnol.

Appendices

Appendix A

1.1 Good Life Questions from Roper Surveys

  1. 1.

    We often hear people talk about what they want out of life. Here are a number of different things. (HAND RESPONDENT CARD) When you think of the good life—the life you’d like to have, which of the things on this list, if any, are part of that good life as far as you personally are concerned?

  2. 2.

    Now would you go down that list and call off all the things you now have? Just call off the letter of the items. (RECORD BELOW)

    figure a

Appendix B

2.1 Questions and Response Categories for Happiness and Satisfaction Variables, General Social Survey

  • HAPPY: Taken all together, how would you say things are these days—would you say that you are very happy, pretty happy, or not too happy? (Coded 3, 2, 1, respectively).

  • SATFIN: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. So far as you and your family are concerned, would you say that you are pretty well satisfied with your present financial situation, more or less satisfied, or not satisfied at all? (Coded 3, 2, 1, respectively).

  • SATFAM: For each area of life I am going to name, tell me the number that shows how much satisfaction you get from that area.

2.2 Your family life

  1. 1.

    A very great deal

  2. 2.

    A great deal

  3. 3.

    Quite a bit

  4. 4.

    A fair amount

  5. 5.

    Some

  6. 6.

    A little

  7. 7.

    None

(Reverse coded here)

Appendix C

Table C1 Descriptive statistics, Roper data on aspirations and attainments
Table C2 Descriptive statistics, GSS data on happiness and domain satisfaction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plagnol, A.C., Easterlin, R.A. Aspirations, Attainments, and Satisfaction: Life Cycle Differences Between American Women and Men. J Happiness Stud 9, 601–619 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9106-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9106-5

Keywords

Navigation