Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 601–619 | Cite as

Aspirations, Attainments, and Satisfaction: Life Cycle Differences Between American Women and Men

  • Anke C. PlagnolEmail author
  • Richard A. Easterlin
Research Paper


Aspirations, along with attainments, play an important role in shaping well-being. Early in adult life women are more likely than men to fulfill their material goods and family life aspirations; their satisfaction in these domains is correspondingly higher; and so too is their overall happiness. Material goods aspirations refer here to desires for a number of big-ticket consumer goods, such as a home, car, travel abroad and vacation home. In later life these gender differences turn around. Men come closer than women to fulfilling their material goods and family life aspirations, are more satisfied with their financial situation and family life, and are the happier of the two genders. An important factor underlying the turnaround in fulfillment of aspirations for material goods and family life is probably the shift over the course of the life cycle in the relative proportion of women and men in marital and non-marital unions.


Well-being Aspirations Gender Life course 



We are grateful for financial support to the University of Southern California.


  1. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, A. (1972). Aspirations, satisfaction, and fulfillment. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 441–466). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328. doi: 10.1007/BF00292050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2005). General Social Survey, 1972–2004 [CUMULATIVE FILE] [Computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. Publication from Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer], 2005. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research/Berkeley, CA: Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program (, University of California [distributors].
  9. de la Croix, D. (1998). Growth and the relativity of satisfaction. Mathematical Social Sciences, 100(36), 105–125. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4896(98)00009-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. A. (1987). Birth and fortune: The impact of numbers on personal welfare (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Life cycle welfare: Trends and differences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2, 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1011504817292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterlin, R. A. (2004). The reluctant economist: Perspectives on economics, economic history, and demography. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. A., & Sawangfa, O. (2006). Happiness and domain satisfaction: Theory and evidence. Paper presented at the Conference on New Directions in the Study of Happiness, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  14. Fields, J. (2003). America’s families and living arrangements: 2003. Current Population Reports. Series P-28, Special Censuses, P20-553. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  15. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. S. (1944). Level of aspiration. In J. Mc. V. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lewin, S. (1996). Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1293–1323.Google Scholar
  18. Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? The role of cognitive and motivational processes on well-being. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 239–249. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marcelli, E. A., & Easterlin, R. A. (2007). The X-relation: Life cycle happiness of American women and men. Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
  20. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancy theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413. doi: 10.1007/BF00333288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michalos, A. C. (1991). Global report on student well-being. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591. doi: 10.1086/229030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rojas, M. (2007). The complexity of well-being: A life satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: Form theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Salvatore, N., & Muñoz Sastre, M. T. (2001). Appraisal of life: “Area” versus “Dimension” conceptualizations. Social Indicators Research, 53, 229–255. doi: 10.1023/A:1007160616388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saris, W. E., Veenhoven, R., Scherpenzeel, A. C., & Bunting, B. (Eds.). (1995). A comparative study of satisfaction with life in Europe. Budapest: Eötvös University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schmidt, L., & Sevak, P. (2006). Gender, marriage, and asset accumulation in the United States. Feminist Economics, 12(1–2), 139–166. doi: 10.1080/13545700500508445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siegel, S. (1964). Level of aspiration and decision making. In A. H. Brayfield & S. Messick (Eds.), Decision and choice: Contributions of Sidney Siegel. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Solberg, E. C., Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Wanting, having, and satisfaction: Examining the role of desire discrepancies in satisfaction with income. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 725–734. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veenhoven, R. (1993). Happiness in nations. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  33. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32(4), 483–507. doi: 10.2307/2061670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations