Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 521–537 | Cite as

The Happy-Productive Worker Thesis Revisited

  • John M. Zelenski
  • Steven A. Murphy
  • David A. Jenkins
Research paper

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the subject spanning over 70 years, uncertainty still remains as to whether happier workers are in fact more productive. This study combined longitudinal prospective and experience sampling methods to examine the relationship between happiness and self-reported productivity among Directors employed in the public and private sectors. Analyses at a trait level suggested happy people were more productive. Similarly, at the state level of analysis, people were more productive when they were happier. Among the happiness indicators examined (job satisfaction, quality of work life, life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect) positive affect was most strongly, but not exclusively, tied to productivity at both the state and trait levels. Discussion focuses on reconciling a long history of mixed findings regarding the happy-productive worker thesis.

Keywords

Productivity Positive affect Negative affect Job satisfaction Life satisfaction Quality of work life Happiness Emotions Personality Experience sampling 

References

  1. Bolger, N., & Schilling, E. A. (1991). Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. Journal of Personality, 59, 355–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton, W. N., Conti, D. J., Chen, C. Y., & Edington, D. (1999). The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 41, 863–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, S. E., Aasheim, C., & Williams, S. (2007). Does telecommuting improve productivity? Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Cleveland, J. N. (1999). Productivity. In L. Peters, C. R. Greer, & S. Youngblood (Eds.), Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of human resource management (pp. 272). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Coté, S. (1999). Affect and performance in organizational settings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cropanzano, R., & Wright, T. A. (2001). When a “happy” worker is really a “productive” worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research, 53, 182–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dobni, D. (2004). A marketing related framework for understanding service worker productivity. Journal of Services Marketing, 18, 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 151.Google Scholar
  14. Epstein, S. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues in the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Estrada, C. A., Isen, A. M., & Young, M. J. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 72, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, C. D. (2000). Mood and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 185–2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, C. D. (2003). Why do lay people believe that satisfaction and performance are correlated? Possible sources of a commonsense theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 753–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviour at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Keyes, C. L. (2003). Well-being in the workplace and its relationship to business outcomes: A review of the Gallup studies. In J. Haidt & C. L. Keyes (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 205–224). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hersey, R. B. (1932). Workers’ emotions in shop and home: A study of individual workers from the psychological and physiological standpoint-short title only in data base. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hodgkinson, A. (1999). Productivity measurement and enterprise bargaining—the local government perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(6), 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Isen, A. M., & Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive affect as a factor in organizational-behavior. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–53). Greenwich, CR: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  27. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Thoresen, C. J., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time sequential framework of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kornhauser, A. W., & Sharp, A. A. (1932). Employee attitudes: Suggestions from a study in a factory. Personnel Journal, 10, 393–404.Google Scholar
  30. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1999). Happiness and productivity revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loeppke, R., Hymel, P. A., Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L. T., Konicki, D. L., Anstadt, G. W., et al. (2003). Helath related workplace productivity measurements: General and migraine specific recommendation from the ACOEM expert panel. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2003). The happy worker: Hypotheses about the role of positive affect in worker productivity. In M. R. Barrik & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 30–59). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and non-work creativity support to employee’s creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 757–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nagy, M. (2002). Using a single item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petty, M. M., McGee, G. W., & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A metaanalysis of the relationship between individual job satisfaction and individual job performance. Academy of Management Review, 9, 712–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prasad, M., Wahlqvist, P., Shikiar, R., & Shih, Y.-C. T. (2004). A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related productivity. Pharmacoeconomics, 22, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quinn, R. P. (1979). The 1977 Quality of Employment Survey; descriptive statistics, with comparison data from the 1969–70 and the 1972–73 surveys. Ann Arbour, MI: Institute for Social Researcher, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossiter, J. R., & Bergkvist, L. (2007). Predictive validity of mulitiple item versus single item measures of the same construct. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanna, L. J., Turley, K. J., & Mark, M. M. (1996). Expected evaluation, goals, and performance: Mood as input. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seligman, M. E. P, Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Staw, B. M., & Barsade, S. G. (1993). Affect and managerial performance: A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 304–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Staw, B. M., Sutton, R. I., & Pelled, L. H. (1994). Employee positive emotion and favourable outcomes at the workplace. Organizational Science, 5, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart, W. F., Ricci, J. A., Leotta, C., & Chee, E. (2001). Self-report of health-related lost productive time at work: Bias and the optimal recall period. Value in Health, 4, A421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vora, J. (1992). Productivity and performance measures: Who uses them? Production and Inventory Management Journal, 33, 46–49.Google Scholar
  51. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wright, T. A., & Bonnet, D. G. (1997a). The contribution of burnout to work performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 18, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright, T. A., & Bonnet, D. G. (1997b). The role of pleasantness and activation-based well-being in performance prediction. Journal of Occupational Health, 2, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2004). The role of psychological well-being in job performance: A fresh look at an age old quest. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., & Meyer, D. G. (2004). State and trait correlates of job performance: A tale of two perspectives. Journal of Business & Psychology, 18, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright, T. A., & Staw, B. M. (1999). Affect and favourable work outcomes: Two longitudinal tests of the happy-productive worker thesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (2000). The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Zelenski
    • 1
  • Steven A. Murphy
    • 2
  • David A. Jenkins
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Sprott School of BusinessCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Public Works and Government Services CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations