Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 197–205 | Cite as

Does subjective well-being show a relationship between parents and their children?

  • Ferran CasasEmail author
  • Germà Coenders
  • Robert A. Cummins
  • Mònica González
  • Cristina Figuer
  • Sara Malo
Research Paper

Abstract

The relationship between the subjective well-being of parents and their own 12–16-year-old children was explored in a Spanish sample of N = 266 families. A positive relationship was expected due to both a shared environment and the possibility of the genetic transmission of subjective well-being ‘set-points’. A positive significant relationship was found for the summated scale of satisfaction domains forming the Personal Well-being Index, and for the specific domains of health and security for the future. However, no relationship was found for the other five domains that make up this Index or for satisfaction with life as a whole. We conclude while these results provide some evidence for the expected influence of a shared environment, they have failed to provide evidence for high heritability of set-points for subjective well-being.

Keywords

Adolescents Children Well-being Life satisfaction Life domain satisfaction Family 

References

  1. Astill, B. R., Feather, N. T., & Keeves, P. (2002). A multilevel analysis of the effects of parents, teachers and schools on student values. Social Psychology of Education, 5, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casas, F., Buxarrais, M. R., Figuer, C., González, M., Tey, A., Noguera, E., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2005). Values and their influence on the life satisfaction of adolescents aged 12 to 16: A study of some correlates. Psychology in Spain, 9(1), 21–33. Online journal. Available at http://www.psychologyinspain.com.Google Scholar
  3. Casas, F., Figuer, C., González, M., & Coenders, G. (2004). Satisfaction with life domains and salient values for future: Data from children and their parents in five different countries. In W. Glatzer, S. von Below, & M. Stoffregen (Eds.), Challenges for quality of life in the contemporary world. Advances in quality-of-life studies, theory and research (pp. 233–247). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Coenders, G., Casas, F., Figuer, C., & González, M. (2005). Relationships between parents’ and children’s salient values for future and childrens overall life satisfaction. A comparison across countries. Social Indicators Research, 73(2), 141–177.Google Scholar
  5. Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummins, R. A.. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard of life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43, 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., van Pallant, J., Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian Unity Well-being Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Lo, S. K., Okerstrom, R., Hunter B., & Woerner J. (2004). Australian Unity Well-being Index: Report 12.0—The Well-being of Australians—Job Security (Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne), http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/index_wellbeing/index.htm.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., & Knapp, T. (2005). The Wellbeing of Australians—Personal Relationships. Report 14, Part B, http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/Survey_14_Part_B.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. González, M. (2006). A non-linear approach to psychological well-being in adolescence: Some contributions from the complexity paradigm. Girona: Documenta Universitaria.Google Scholar
  12. González, M., Casas, F., & Coenders, G. (2007a). A complexity approach to psychological well-being in adolescence: Major strengths and methodological issues. Social Indicators Research, 80, 267–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. González, M., Coenders, G., & Casas F. (2007b). Using non-linear models for a complexity approach to psychological well-being. Quality & Quantity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9032-8.
  14. Fay, R. E. (1985). A jackknifed chi-square test for complex samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, L. V., & Thurstone, L. L. (1955). The psychophysics of semantics: An experimental investigation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 39(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, E. S., Forthofer, R. N., & Lorimor, R. J. (1989). Analyzing complex survey data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.Google Scholar
  18. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  19. Quenouille, M. H. (1956). Notes on bias in estimation. Biometrika, 43, 353–360.Google Scholar
  20. Roysamb, E., Tambs, K., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T., Neale, M. C., & Harris, J. R. (2003). Happiness and health: Environmental and genetic contributions to the relationship between subjective well-being, perceived health, and somatic illness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (6), 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). Life satisfaction, parenting, and adolescent behaviour. Social Indicators Research, 66, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2002). Young people, social change and the negotiation of moral authority. Children and Society, 16, 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tukey, J (1958). Bias and confidence in not-quite large samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ferran Casas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Germà Coenders
    • 1
  • Robert A. Cummins
    • 2
  • Mònica González
    • 1
  • Cristina Figuer
    • 1
  • Sara Malo
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultat de Ciències Econòmiques i EmpresarialsInstitut de Recerca sobre Qualitat de Vida (IRQV), Universitat de GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.Australian Center on Quality of Life, Deakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations