Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 243–271 | Cite as

Looking to happy tomorrows with friends: Best and close friendships as they predict happiness

  • Melikşah DemirEmail author
  • Metin Özdemir
  • Lesley A. Weitekamp


Friendships are an important source of happiness. The present study (n = 280) investigated the role of friendship quality and conflict in happiness and examined the feature of friendship that best predicted happiness. Information was gathered about the quality and conflict of the best, first and second close friendships of the individual. Results revealed that best friendship quality was the only significant predictor of happiness; however, individuals were happier when they experienced high quality first close friendships in conjunction with a high quality best friendship. Results also revealed that first close friendship quality buffered the negative impact of first close friendship conflict. The companionship feature of the best and first close friendship appeared as the strongest predictor of happiness. Findings were discussed in light of the literature and suggestions for future research were made.


best friendship buffering effect close friendship companionship happiness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



Authors would like to thank to Selim Alpmen, Hüseyin Akbay, Özlem Tulunay and Evren Uğur for their comments on a prior version of the paper.


  1. Abbey A., Abramis D.J., Caplin R.D. (1985). Effects of different sources of social support and social conflict on emotional well-being. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken L.S., West S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle M. (2001). The Psychology of Happiness. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagwell C.L., Bender S.E., Andreassi C.L., Kinoshita S.A., Montarello S.A., Muller J.G. (2005). Friendship quality and perceived relationship changes predict psychosocial adjustment in early adulthood. Journal of Social Personal Relationships, 22, 235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldassare M., Rosenfield S., Rook K.S. (1984). The types of social relations predicting elderly well-being. Research on Aging, 6, 549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baltes B.B., Parker C.P., Young L.M., Huff J., Altmann R. (2004). The practical utility of importance measures in assessing the relative importance of work related perceptions and organizational characteristics on work related outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 326–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blieszner R., Adams R.G. (1992). Adult Friendship. New York: SAGE publicationsGoogle Scholar
  8. Bukowski W.M., Boivin M., Hoza B. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bukowski W.M., Hoza B. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In Berndt T.J., Ladd G.W. (Eds.), Peer Relationships in Child Development (pp. 15–45). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt R.S. (1987). A note on strangers, friends, and happiness. Social Networks, 9, 311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis K.E., Todd M.J. (1985). Assessing friendship: Prototypes, paradigm cases and relationship description In Duck S., Perlman D. (Eds.), Understanding Personal Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Approach (pp. 17–38). London: SageGoogle Scholar
  12. Demir, M. and L.A. Weitekamp: 2006, ‚I am so happy ‚cause today I found my friend: Friendship and personality as predictors of happiness’, Journal of Happiness Studies, DOI 10.1007/s10902-006-9012-7Google Scholar
  13. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener E., Seligman M.E.P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener E., Suh E.M., Lucas R.E., Smith H.L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erdley C.A., Nangle D.W., Newman J.E., Carpenter E.M. (2001). Children’s friendship experiences and psychological adjustment. In D.W. Nangle, C.A. Erdley (Eds.). New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development: The Role of Friendship in Psychological Adjustment (pp. 5–24). San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  17. Fehr B. (1996). Friendship Processes. London: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  18. Fujita F., Diener E., Sandvik E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furman W. (1996). The measurement of children and adolescents’ perceptions of friendships: Conceptual and methodological issues. In W.M. Bukowski, A.F. Newcomb, W.W. Hartup (Eds.) The Company they Keep: Friendships in Childhood and Adolescence (pp. 41–65). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Furman W., Buhrmester D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the personal relationships in their social network. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furman W., Buhrmester D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furman W., Robbins P. (1985). What’s the point?: Selection of treatment objectives. In B. Schneider, K.H. Rubin, J.E. Ledingham (Eds.), Children’s Peer Relations: Issues in Assessment and Intervention (pp. 41–54). New York: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  23. Gangestad S., Snyder M. (1985). To carve nature at its joints: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gladow N.W., Ray M.P. (1986). The impact of informal support systems on the well-being of low income single parents. Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family and Child Studies, 35, 113–123Google Scholar
  25. Hays R.B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 909–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hays R.B. (1988). Friendship. In Duck S. (ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research, and Interventions (pp. 391–408). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  27. Hills P., Argyle M. (2000). Happiness, introversion-extroversion and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 595–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinde, R.A.: 1997, Relationships: A Dialectical Perspective. (Psychology Press: Taylor & Francis Ltd) Google Scholar
  29. Hussong A.M. (2000). Perceived peer context and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 391–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson P.B. (1992). Specifying the buffering hypothesis: Support, strain, and depression. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 363–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kasser T., Sheldon K.M. (2002). What makes for a merry Christmas? Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 313–329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laursen B. (1993). Percieved impact of conflict on adolescent relationships. Merill-Palmer Quarterly, 39, 535–550. Google Scholar
  33. Lee G.R., Ishii-Kuntz M. (1987). Social interaction, loneliness, and emotional well-being among the elderly. Research on Aging, 9, 459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lepore S.J. (1992). Social conflict, social support, and psychological distress: Evidence of cross-domain buffering effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 857–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyubomirsky S., Sheldon K.M., Schkade D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyubomirsky S., C. Tkach and M.R. DiMatteo: 2006, ‚What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem?’, Social Indicators Research 78, pp. 363–404Google Scholar
  37. Menard S.: 1995, ‚Applied logistic regression analysis’, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-106 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)Google Scholar
  38. Mendelson M.J., Aboud F.E. (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 31, 130–132Google Scholar
  39. Mendelson M.J., Kay A.C. (2003). Positive feelings in friendship: Does imbalance in the relationship matter? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Myers R. (1990). Classical and Modern Regression with Applications (2nd edition). Boston, MA: DuxburyGoogle Scholar
  41. Myers D.G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people. American Psychologist, 55, 56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myers D.G., Diener E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Okun M.A., Keith V.M. (1998). Effects of positive and negative social exchanges with various sources on depressive symptoms in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 53, P4–20Google Scholar
  44. Oldenburg C.M., Kerns K.A. (1997). Associations between peer relationships and depressive symptoms: Testing moderator effects of gender and ageJournal of Early Adolescence, 1997, 319–337Google Scholar
  45. Parker J.G., Asher S.R. (1993) Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parlee, B.: 1979, ‚The friendship bond’, Psychology Today October, pp. 42–54Google Scholar
  47. Rathur, R.: 2004, March, ‚Relations between friendship quality and measures of well-being’, Paper Presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Reis H.T., Collins W.A., Berscheid E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Requena F. (1995). Friendship and subjective well-being in Spain: A cross-national comparison with the United States. Social Indicators Research, 35, 271–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rook K.S. (1987). Social support versus companionship: Effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluations by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1132–1147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruehlman L.S., Wolchik S.A. (1988). Personal goals and interpersonal support and hindrance as factors in psychological distress and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sheldon K.M., Kasser T., Houser-Marko L., Jones T., Turban D. (2005). Doing one’s duty: Chronological age, felt autonomy, and subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 19, 97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sullivan H.S. (1953). Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: NortonGoogle Scholar
  54. Tabachnik B.G., Fidell L.S. (1999). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins, College Publishers, New York. Google Scholar
  55. Walen H.R., Lachman M.E. (2000). Social support and strain from partner, family, and friends: Costs and benefits for men and women in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weiss R.S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Rubin Z. (Eds.), Doing Unto Others (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  58. Wright P.H. (1985). The acquaintances description form In Duck S., Perlman D. (Eds.), Understanding Personal Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Approach (pp. 39–62). London: SageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melikşah Demir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Metin Özdemir
    • 2
  • Lesley A. Weitekamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Maryland-Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations