Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction

Article

Abstract

Research on well-being can be thought of as falling into two traditions. In one—the hedonistic tradition—the focus is on happiness, generally defined as the presence of positive affect and the absence of negative affect. In the other—the eudaimonic tradition—the focus is on living life in a full and deeply satisfying way. Recognizing that much recent research on well-being has been more closely aligned with the hedonistic tradition, this special issue presents discussions and research reviews from the eudaimonic tradition, making clear how the concept of eudaimonia adds an important perspective to our understanding of well-being.

Keywords

eudaimonia fully functioning hedonism subjective well-being 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport G.W. 1961 Pattern and Growth in Personality Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle: 1985, Nichomachean Ethics (T. Irwin, translator) (Hackett, Indianapolis, IN)Google Scholar
  3. Avery R.R., Ryan R.M. 1988 Object relations and ego development: Comparison and correlates in middle childhood. Journal of Personality 56: 547–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer, J.J., D.P. McAdams, and J.L. Pals: 2006, `Narrative identity and␣eudaimonic well-being’, Journal of Happiness Studies (this issue), DOI␣10.1007/s10902-006-9021-6Google Scholar
  5. Diener E. 1984, Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 95: 542–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jung C.G. 1933 Modern Man in Search of a Soul (W.S. Dell and C.F. Baynes, translators) Harcourt, Brace and World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Kahneman D., Diener E. and Schwarz N. (eds) 1999, Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, NewYork)Google Scholar
  8. Kraut R. 1979 Two conceptions of happiness. Philosophical Review 87: 167–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Loevinger J. 1976 Ego Development Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Maslow A.H. 1968, Toward a Psychology of Being (2nd ed) Van Nostrand, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogers C.R. 1962 The interpersonal relationship: The core of guidance. Harvard Educational Review 32: 416–429Google Scholar
  12. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. 2000 Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ryan R.M. and E.L. Deci: 2001 `On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being’, in S. Fiske (ed.), Annual Review of Psychology (Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 52, pp.␣141–166Google Scholar
  14. Ryan R.M., Sheldon K.M., Kasser T., Deci E.L. 1996 All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation in Gollwitzer P.M., Bargh J.A. (eds) The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior Guilford, NewYork pp. 7–26Google Scholar
  15. Ryff C.D. 1989 Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57:1069–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tooby J., Cosmides L. 1992 The psychological foundations of culture in Barkow J.H., Cosmides L., Tooby J. (eds) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture Oxford University Press, NewYork pp. 19–136Google Scholar
  17. Waterman A.S. 1993 Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaemonia) and hedonic enjoyment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 678–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Waterman, A.S., S.J. Schwartz and R. Conti: 2006, ‘The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation’, Journal of Happiness Studies (this issue), DOI␣10.1007/s10902-006-9020-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations