ABSTRACT
Narrow hedonism is defined and defended, as a view according to which pleasurable states are individuated as concrete and total experiential situations of a sentient being at a time. Typical of such situations is that, when we are in them, we are at a certain hedonic level. They feel in a certain way for the creature in them. On this understanding of narrow hedonism, which is the only one making good sense of the theory and which was probably also intended by classical hedonists such as Bentham and Edgeworth, standard objections to hedonism, based on the claim that different pleasures have nothing in common, can be set to one side as misplaced and irrelevant. It is also hard to see how this kind of hedonism can be refined, or revised, in the direction indicated by J.S. Mill, when he wants to distinguish “higher” pleasures from “lower” ones. On this understanding of hedonism, we must claim that, those who want to follow Mill will have to rely on non-hedonistic intuitions and thus desert the hedonist camp altogether.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alston, W.: 1967, ‘Pleasure’, in Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 6 (Macmillan Publishing Co. & The Free Press, New York), pp. 341–347
Bentham, J.: 1973, ‘Value of a pain or pleasure’, in Bikhu Paresh (ed.), Bentham’s Political Thought (Croom Helm, London)
Brandt, R.B.: 1967, ‘Hedonism’, in Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 4 (Macmillan Publishing Co. & The Free Press, New York), pp. 432–435 and Alston, W., ‘Pleasure’, in the same encyclopaedia, Vol. 6, pp. 341–347
Dahl, N.: 1973, ‘Is Mill’s hedonism inconsistent?’, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Number 7 (Basil Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 37–54
Feldman, F.: 1996, ‘Mill, Moore, and the consistency of qualified hedonism’, in Peter French, Theodore Uehling Jr. and Howard Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy XX (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame), pp. 318–331
Glover J.: 1984, What Sort of People Should There Be? Harmondsworth Penguin
Griffin J.: 1986, Well-being, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Mill, J.S.: 1962, ‘Utilitarianism’, in Mary Warnock (ed.), Utilitarianism (Collins/Fontana, London and Glasgow)
Moore G.E.: 1962, Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Nozick R.: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell
Nozick R.: 1989, The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations. New York: Simon and Schuster
Parfit D. 1984, Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Tännsjö T.: 1998, Hedonistic Utilitarianism Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press/Columbia University Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
TÄNNSJÖ, T. NARROW HEDONISM. J Happiness Stud 8, 79–98 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9005-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9005-6