Happiness, Rationality, Autonomy and the Good Life

Abstract

The paper starts with a general discussion of the concepts of happiness and the good life. I argue that there is a conceptual core of happiness which has to do with one’s life as a whole. I discuss affective and attitude or life satisfaction views of happiness and indicate problems faced by those views. I introduce my own view, the life plan view, which sees happiness as the ongoing realizing of global desires of the person. I argue that on such a view one’s life could be happy without a high level of rationality or a high level of autonomy; such rationality and autonomy are not built into the concept of happiness. So while happiness is a final value, and good for the person, it is not the only final value. Rationality and autonomy are also final values and, where they exist, are good as ends for the person, part of the good life.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aristotle, 1962, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. M. Ostwald Bobbs-Merrill Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  2. Austin J., 1968, Pleasure and happiness Philosophy 43: 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bentham J., 1967, The principles of morals and legislation in Melden A.I., (eds.) Ethical Theories Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs p. 367–390

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn, S.: 1994, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (Oxford)

  5. Brandt R., 1969–1970, Rational desires Proceedings and Addresses of he American Philosophical Association 43: 43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brickman P., Coates D., Janoff-Bulman R., 1978, Lottery Winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(8):917–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chekola, M.: 1974, The Concept of Happiness (Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan. Available at www.mnstate.edu/chekola)

  8. Diener E., 1984, Subjective well-being Psychological Bulletin 95(3): 542–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diener E., 1994, Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and oppurtunities, Social Indicators Research 31: pp. 103–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dworkin G., 1988, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dworkin R., 1999, Foundations of liberal equality in S. Darwall (ed.) Equal Freedom: Selected Tanner Lectures on Human Freedom University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor pp. 190–306

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foot P., 2001, Natural Goodness Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frankfurt H., 1971: Freedom of the will and the concept of a person Journal of Philosophy 68: 5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldman A., 1970: A Theory of Action Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffin J., 1986: Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hardimon M., 2003, The concept of race Journal of Philosophy 50(9): 437–455

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haybron D., 2000, Two philosophical problems in the study of happiness Journal of Happiness Studies 1: 207–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Headey B, Wearing A., 1989, Personality, life events and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(4): 731–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Headey B, Wearing A., 1992, Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-Being Longman Cheshire Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mill J., 1923, Autobiography Oxford University Press London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mill J., 1963, Utilitarianism in Levi A., (eds) The Six Great Humanistic Essays of John Stuart Mill Washington Square Press New York pp. 243–310

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rawls J., 1971, A Theory of Justice Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  23. Royce, J.: 1908, The Philosophy of Loyalty (Macmillan, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sen A., 1987, On Ethics and Economics Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sen, A.: 1999, Commodities and Capabilities (Oxford University Press)

  26. Sumner L.W., 1996, Welfare, Happiness and Ethics Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taylor C.C.W., 1963, Pleasure Analysis, Supplement 23: 2–19

    Google Scholar 

  28. Veenhoven R., 1997, Advances in understanding happiness Revue Québecoise de Psychologie 18: 29–79

    Google Scholar 

  29. Veenhoven R., 1988, The utility of happiness Social Indicators Research 20: 333–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Von Wright G.H., 1963, The Varieties of Goodness Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson J., 1968, Happiness Analysis 29: 13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Bengt Brülde and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on previous drafts of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Chekola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chekola, M. Happiness, Rationality, Autonomy and the Good Life. J Happiness Stud 8, 51–78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9004-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • good life
  • happiness
  • life plan
  • rationality