Abstract
Two of the most common types of housing in Poland are single-family houses and flats in blocks of flats. Overall, more than 80 per cent of Poles live in either individual houses or blocks of flats, almost in equal proportions across the country. Houses can be found in rural and urban areas, while flats are mainly located in towns. This study aims to explore the differences in the way residents of these two types of dwellings engage with their home spaces and to try to explain these differences in terms of architectural factors. Using the psycho-sociological lenses of preferences and the architectural tools of spatial syntax, we surveyed a sample of Polish people living in single-family houses (n = 209) and flats in blocks of flats (n = 215). Our participants drew their floor plans and indicated their favourite and most frequented places at home, they also expressed their emotional attitude towards home and its surroundings and explained their feelings and choices. Drawing on space syntax theory, the home plans were analysed in terms of the structural depth of (1) the home as a whole, (2) the respondent's favourite place at home, and (3) the respondent's private room at home. We found that emotional engagement with the home was higher among house dwellers than among flat dwellers, and that there were also differences in the patterns of use of specific home spaces, mostly related to the division of the home into shared and private areas and the impact of the overall spatial depth of the home layout. Gender and occupational differences were particularly pronounced among participants living in houses, whereas they largely disappeared among participants living in blocks of flats. The study contributes to a better understanding of the way home space is psychologically constructed in these two types of housing in the Polish context, but also beyond, not least by inviting scholars to mobilise the tools of spatial syntax analysis to understand residents' engagement with their home space.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
On request, the data are available with the first author.
References
Bhatti, M., & Church, A. (2004). Home, the culture of nature and meanings of gardens in late modernity. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000152168.1
Bonnaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2003). Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachement in urban environments: A confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00236-0
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2014). The habitus and the space of life-styles (1984). In J. J. Gieseking & W. Mangold (Eds.), The people, place and space reader (pp. 139–144). Routledge.
Boumová, I., & Zdráhalová, J. (2016). The apartment with the best floor plan layout: Architects versus non-architects. Critical Housing Analysis, 3(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.13060/10.13060/23362839.2016.3.1.264
Brade, I., Herfert, G., & Wiest, K. (2009). Recent trends and future prospects of socio-spatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.001
Brzostek, B., Mika, G. (2019). Przestrzeń władzy. Ideologia i urbanistyka Warszawy 1939–1956 (Space of Power. Ideology and urban planning of Warsaw 1939–1956). In B. Stelmach & K. Andrzejewska-Batko (Eds.), Tożsamość: 100 lat polskiej architektury (Identity: 100 years of Polish architecture, pp. 111–126). Narodowy Instytut Architektury i Urbanistyki.
CBOS. (2022). Jak Polacy chcieliby mieszkać? (How do Poles want to live?), Nr. 108/2022. https://www.cbos.pl.
Clapham, D. (2011). The embodied use of the material home: An affordance approach. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(4), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2011.564444
Costello, L. (2005). From prisons to penthouses: The changing images of high-rise living in Melbourne. Housing Studies, 20, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000308723
Dekker, K., De Vos, S., Musterd, S., & Van Kempen, R. (2011). Residential satisfaction in housing estates in European cities: A multi-level research approach. Housing Studies, 26(4), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2011.559751
Douglas, M. (2007). The idea of a home: A kind of space. In B. Millner Lane (Ed.), Housing and dwelling: A perspective on modern domestic architecture (pp. 61–67). Routledge.
Drozda, Ł. (2017). Urbanistyka socmodernistyczna na przykładzie polskich blokowisk z lat 70. i 80. XX wieku (Socialist modernist urban planning on the example of Polish blocks of flats from the 1970s and 1980s). Studia Miejskie, 26, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.25167/sm2017.026.08
Easthope, H., Liu, E., Judd, B., & Burnley, I. (2015). Feeling at home in a multigenerational households: The importance of control. Housing, Theory and Society, 32(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2015.1031275
Easthope, H., Liu, E., & Burnley, I. (2017). Changing perceptions of family: A study of multigenerational households in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316635850
Eurostat. (2024). Distribution of population by tenure status, type of household and income group - EU-SILC survey. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/page/ILC_LVHO02.
Feldman, R. M. (1996). Constancy and change in attachments to types of settlements. Environment and Behaviour, 28(4), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659628400
Fortry, A. (2000). Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture. Thames & Hudson.
Gabriel, M., & Jacobs, K. (2008). The post-social turn: Challenges for housing research. Housing Studies, 23(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802101666
Galster, G., & Hesser, G. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behaviour, 13, 735–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391658113600
Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemn, W., & Shaw, K. T. (2002). Why architects and laypersons judge buildings differently: Cognitive properties and physical bases. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19(2), 131–148.
Gifford, R. (2007). The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review, 50(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5002
GUS (2018). 100 lat Polski w liczbach (100 years of Poland in numbers). https://stat.gov.pl
GUS (2019). Sytuacja gospodarstw domowych w 2019 r. w świetle wyników badania budżetów gospodarstw domowych (Household situation in 2019 in the light of the results of the household budget survey. https://stat.gov.pl
GUS (2022). Incomes and living conditions of the population of Poland – report from the EU-SILC survey of 2020. https://www.stat.gov.pl
Hanson, J. (2003). Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, D. (1976). Labor, capital, and class struggle around the built environment in advanced capitalist societies. Politics and Society, 6(3), 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927600600301
Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Graham, H. (1987). Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning b: Planning and Design, 14, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140363
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1993). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press.
Horelli, L. (1997). Autokreacja przestrzeni mieszkalnej a odtwarzanie wzorów płci i poczucia tożsamości (Self-creation of living space and reproduction of gender and identity patterns). Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 3(1), 23–27.
Howard, E. (1902). Garden cities of to-morrow. Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Ltd.
Hummon, D. M. (1990). Commonplaces Community ideology and identity in American culture. State University of New York Press.
Imamoglu, Ç. (2000). Complexity, preference and familiarity: Architecture and non-architecture Turkish students’ assessments of traditional and modern house façades. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0155
Ishikawa, T., Nakata, S., & Asami, Y. (2011). Perception and conceptualization of house floor plans: An experimental analysis. Environment and Behavior, 43(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165093568
Jaroszewski, T.S. (1996). Od klasycyzmu do nowoczesności: O architekturze polskiej XVIII, XIX I XX wieku (From classicism to modernity: On Polish architecture of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kährik, A., & Tammaru, T. (2010). Soviet prefabricated panel housing estates: Areas of continued social mix or decline? The Case of Tallinn, Housing Studies, 25(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903561818
Kearns, A., Whitley, E., Mason, Ph., & Bond, L. (2012). ‘Living the high-life’? Residential, social and psychosocial outcomes for high-rise occupants in a deprived context. Housing Studies, 27(1), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.632080
Kemeny, J. (1981). The myth of home ownership: Private versus public choices in housing tenure. Routledge.
Kerr, S.-M., Gibson, Ch. R., & Klocker, N. (2018). Parenting and neighbouring in the consolidating city: The emotional geographies of sound in apartments. Emotion, Space and Society, 26, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2,017.11.002
Kerr, S.-M., Klocker, N., & Gibson, Ch. (2019). From backyards to balconies: Cultural norms and parents’ experiences of home in higher-density housing. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1709625
Klima, E. (2013). Dwelling or living in a block of flats Towards the Polish geography of home. Quaestiones Geographicae, 32(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2013-0015
Kohlrausch, M. (2019). Brokers of Modernity: East Central Europe and the Rise of Modernist Architects, 1910–1950. Leuven University Press.
Korniłowicz, J. (2009). Stan mieszkalnictwa w Polsce (Housing condition in Poland). Problemy Rozwoju Miast, 6(23), 86–101.
Korzeniewski, W. (1989). Budownictwo mieszkaniowe: Poradnik projektanta (Housing architecture: A designer's guide). Arkady.
Kovács, Z., & Herfert, G. (2012). Development pathways of large housing estates in post-socialist cities: An international comparison. Housing Studies, 27(3), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.651105
Kuoppa, J., Nieminen, N., Ruoppila, S., & Laine, M. (2019). Elements of desirability: Exploring meaningful dwelling features from resident’s perspective. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1680812
Lees, L. (2001). Towards critical geography of architecture: the case of an ersatz colosseum, Ecumene, 8 (1), 55–86.
Lees, L., & White, H. (2020). The social cleansing of London council estates: Everyday experiences of ‘accumulative dispossession.’ Housing Studies, 35(10), 1701–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1680814
Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighbourhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.004
Lewicka, M. (2012). Psychologia miejsca (Psychology of place). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Lewis, C., May, V., Hicks, S., Costa Santos, S., & Bertolino, N. (2018). Researching the home using architectural and social science methods. Methodological Innovations. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118796006
Macedo, P. F., Ornstein, S. W., & Elali, G. A. (2022). Privacy and housing: Research perspectives based on a systematic literary review. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09939-z
Mantey, D. (2020). Utility value of suburban public spaces – new methodological approach. Prace i Studia Geograficzne, 65(3), 115–124.
Manzo, L. C. (2014). Exploring the shadow side: Place attachment in the context of stigma, displacement, and social housing. In L. C. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications (pp. 178–190). Routledge.
Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0178
Musterd, S., & Van Kempen, R. (2007). Trapped or on the springboard? Housing careers in large housing estates in European cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00345.x
Nowak, M., & Siatkowski, A. (2021). The late modernist community in the late socialist block of flats: The issue of urban neighbourhood vitality in Poland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 37, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-021-09844-x
Opit, S., Witten, K., & Kearns, R. (2019). Housing pathways, aspirations and preferences of young adults within increasing urban density. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1584662
Oseland, N., & Donald, I. (1993). The evaluation of space in homes: A facet study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80177-X
Parker, B. (1986). Modern country homes in England (1912), edited and introduced by Dean Hawkes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piątek, G. (2019). Stulecie szklanych domów. Czy inna tożsamość jest możliwa? (A century of glass houses. Is another identity possible?). In B. Stelmach & K. Andrzejewska-Batko (Eds.), Tożsamość: 100 lat polskiej architektury (Identity: 100 years of Polish architecture, pp. 25–33). Narodowy Instytut Architektury i Urbanistyki.
Preece, J., Crawford, J., McKee, K., Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (2020). Understanding changing housing aspirations: A review of the evidence. Housing Studies, 35(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1584665
Rechavi, T. B. (2009). A room for living: Private and public aspects in the experience of the living room. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.001
Ruonavaara, H. (1996). The home ideology and housing discourse in Finland 1900–1950. Housing Studies, 11(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039608720847
Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential Environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 655–690). John Wiley & Sons.
Toruńczyk-Ruiz, S., & Lewicka, M. (2017). Perceived social diversity and neighbourhood attachment: The role of intergroup ties and affective appraisals of the environment. Evidence from Poland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2209
Sebba, R., & Churchman, A. (1983). Territories and territoriality in the home. Environment and Behaviour., 15(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583152004
Smiley, D. (2001). Making the modified modern. In B. Miller Lane (Ed.), Housing and Dwellimng Perspective on Modern Domestic Architecture (pp. 285–296). Routledge.
Smith, S. G. (1994). The essential qualities of a home. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 13–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80196-3
Soaia, A. M. (2014). Overcrowding and ‘Underoccupancy’ in Romania: A case study of housing inequality. Environment and Planning A, 46(1), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45718
Soaita, A. M. (2015). The meaning of home in Romania: Views from urban owner-occupiers. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9396-3
Soaita, A. M., & McKee, K. (2020). Researching home‘s tangible and intangible materialities by photo-elicitation. Housing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1738543
Soaita, A. M., & Dewilde, C. (2021). Housing stratification in Romania: Mapping a decade of change. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36, 1055–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09788-8
Sommerville, P. (1997). The social construction of home. Journal of Architecture and Planning Research, 14(3), 226–245.
Stanilov, K. (2007). Housing trends in central and eastern European cities during and after the period of transition. In K. Stanilov (Ed.), The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in central and eastern europe after socialism (pp. 173–190). Springer.
Steets, S. (2016). Taking Berger and Luckmann to the realm of materiality. Cultural Sociology, 10(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/174997551561665
Syrkus, H. (1984). Społeczne cele urbanizacji: człowiek i środowisko. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Wilk, E. (2023). Niewiele Ci mogę dać (There’s not much I can give you). Polityka, 3402(8), 26–29.
Żeromski, S. (1925). Przedwiośnie (Early spring), Wydawnictwo J. Mortkowicza.https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics.
Funding
The study was not financed by external funds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not know about competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. The questionnaire did not have any negative impact on the participants' well-being or self-concept.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lasiewicz-Sych, A., Lewicka, M. The engagement of Polish residents with their home space in single-family houses and flats in multi-family blocks of flats. J Hous and the Built Environ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10112-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10112-x