Abstract
This study is aimed to provide an organized view of the causes and outcomes of low-income housing stigma (LIHS) and to analyze them by considering the housing type, target group, spatial scale, and methodology. This study has reviewed the background with the content analysis method; 7 databases were searched to identify the literature on the stigma of different types of low-income housing. The causes of LIHS were extracted in three dimensions (physical, socio-economic, and structural) and its outcomes in four dimensions (health and well-being, perceptual, socio-economic, and physical). The results showed that the socio-economic dimension had the greatest effect on the production of LIHS (52.2%), and also stigma had the greatest effect on this dimension (57.6%). However, considering the importance of visual perception on external evaluations, it is necessary to consider the physical dimension. On the other hand, the focus of research has been mostly on the neighborhood scale (62.9%) and the type of social housing (19.4%). 47% of the researchers also selected the residents as the target group while it is also important to evaluate outsiders. The use of qualitative methods is also observed in 71% of studies. There are gaps in these studies that need to be addressed: attention to the architecture scale, use of mixed research methods, considering evaluation and attitudes of the external group.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Notes
The Changing Image of Affordable Housing, Design, Gentrification and Community in Canada and Europe.
References
Ahmadi, D. (2018). Diversity and social cohesion: The case of Jane-Finch, a highly diverse lower-income Toronto neighbourhood. Urban Research and Practice, 11(2), 139–158.
Ahmedani, B. K. (2011). Mental health stigma: Society, individuals, and the profession. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 8(2), 4–1.
Arthurson, K. (2010a). Social inclusion, neighbourhood reputation and stigma: Residents’ experiences from within. 5th Australasian Housing Researchers’ Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
Arthurson, K. (2010b). Social inclusion, neighbourhood reputation and stigma: Residents’ experiences from within. 5th Australasian Housing Researchers’ Conference, Auckland, New Zealand.
Arthurson, K. (2012). Social mix, reputation and stigma: Exploring residents’ perspectives of neighbourhood effects. Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives, Springer: 101–119.
Arthurson, K. (2004). From stigma to demolition: Australian debates about housing and social exclusion. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 255–270.
Arthurson, K. (2010b). Operationalising social mix: Spatial scale, lifestyle and stigma as mediating points in resident interaction. Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 49–63.
Arthurson, K. (2013). Mixed tenure communities and the effects on neighbourhood reputation and stigma: Residents’ experiences from within. Cities, 35, 432–438.
Arthurson, K., Darcy, M., & Rogers, D. (2014). Televised territorial stigma: How social housing tenants experience the fictional media representation of estates in Australia. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1334–1350.
Atkinson, R., & Jacobs, K. (2008). Public housing in Australia: Stigma, home and opportunity: University of Tasmania, Housing and Community Research Unit.
August, M. (2014). Challenging the rhetoric of stigmatization: The benefits of concentrated poverty in Toronto’s regent park. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1317–1333.
Barry, C. L., McGinty, E. E., Pescosolido, B. A., & Goldman, H. H. (2014). Stigma, discrimination, treatment effectiveness, and policy: Public views about drug addiction and mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 65(10), 1269–1272.
Bartz, N., Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. (2011, July). The new stigma of relocated public housing residents: Challenges to social identity in mixed-income developments. In Enhr Conference, 5–8 July 2011, Toulouse.
Beck, K. (2016). Building social cohesion with bricks and mortar: The environmental determinants of trust in New York City’s Public Housing. UC San Diego Department of Sociology Working Paper.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.
Blokland, T. (2008). “You got to remember you live in public housing”: Place-making in an American housing project. Housing, Theory and Society, 25(1), 31–46.
Borell, K., & Westermark, Å. (2018). Siting of human services facilities and the not in my back yard phenomenon: A critical research review. Community Development Journal, 53(2), 246–262.
Boschman, S. (2015). Selective mobility, segregation and neighbourhood effects A+ BE| Architecture and the Built Environment 11, 1–190.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
Butler-Warke, A. (2020). Foundational stigma: Place-based stigma in the age before advanced marginality. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 140–152.
Carnegie, A., Byrne, Michael and Norris, Michelle. (2017). Changing Perceptions Stigma and Social Housing in Ireland. School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice.
Carnegie, A., & Norris, M. (2015). Strengthening communities, building capacity, combating stigma: Exploring the potential of culture-led social housing regeneration. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(4), 495–508.
Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2013). ‘Positive’ gentrification, social control and the ‘right to the city’ in mixed-income communities: Uses and expectations of space and place. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 480–502.
Chaskin, R. J., Khare, A. T., & Joseph, M. L. (2012). Participation, deliberation, and decision making: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 48(6), 863–906.
Cheshire, L., & Zappia, G. (2016). Destination dumping ground: The convergence of ‘unwanted’populations in disadvantaged city areas. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2081–2098.
Corrigan, P. W., & Nieweglowski, K. (2019). How does familiarity impact the stigma of mental illness? Clinical Psychology Review, 70, 40–50.
Coulombe, S., Radziszewski, S., Morin, P., Leloup, X., Bohémier, H., & Houle, J. (2018). Using neighborhood observation to support public housing tenants’ empowerment. Action Research, 16(4), 376–395.
Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. O. (2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1–11.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed. Vol. 2, pp. 504–553).
Curley, A. M. (2010). “Neighborhood institutions, facilities, and public space: A missing link for Hope VI Residents' Development of Social Capital?” Cityscape: 12(1), 33–63.
Davison, G., Legacy, C., Liu, E., & Darcy, M. (2016). The factors driving the escalation of community opposition to affordable housing development. Urban Policy and Research, 34(4), 386–400.
de Decker, P., & Pannecoucke, I. (2004). The creation of the incapable social tenant in Flanders Belgium. An appraisal. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 293–309.
Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 288–302.
Dear, M. J., & Taylor, S. M. (1982). Not on our street: community attitudes to mental care. Pion.
Devereux, E., Haynes, A., & Power, M. J. (2011). At the edge: Media constructions of a stigmatised Irish housing estate. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26(2), 123–142.
Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426–441.
Dudley, J. R. (2000). Confronting stigma within the services system. Social Work, 45(5), 449.
Du Preez, M., & Sale, M. (2013). The impact of social housing developments on nearby property prices: A N elson M andela B ay case study. South African Journal of Economics, 81(3), 451–466.
van Duin, L., Tzaninis, I., Snel, E., & Lindo, F. (2011). Marginality and stigmatization: Identifying with the neighbourhood in Rotterdam. In Paper fot the Annual RC21 Conference: The struggle to belong. Dealing with diversity in 21st century urban settings. Amsterdam (The Netherlands), July 7–9 2011.
Duncan, D. T., Ruff, R. R., Chaix, B., Regan, S. D., Williams, J. H., Ravenell, J., Bragg, M. A., Ogedegbe, G., & Elbel, B. (2015). Perceived spatial stigma, body mass index and blood pressure: A global positioning system study among low-income housing residents in New York City. Geospatial Health, 11(2), 164–173.
Earnshaw, V. A., Kidman, R. C., & Violari, A. (2018). Stigma, Depression, and substance use problems among perinatally HIV-infected youth in South Africa. AIDS and Behavior, 22(12), 3892–3896.
EPPI-Centre. (2007). EPPI-Centre methods for conducting systematic reviews.
Fox, A. B., Earnshaw, V. A., Taverna, E. C., & Vogt, D. (2018). Conceptualizing and measuring mental illness stigma: The mental illness stigma framework and critical review of measures. Stigma and Health, 3(4), 348.
Franzini, L., Caughy, M. O., Nettles, S. M., & O’Campo, P. (2008). Perceptions of disorder: Contributions of neighborhood characteristics to subjective perceptions of disorder. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 83–93.
Garcia, C., Golay, P., Favrod, J., & Bonsack, C. (2017). French translation and validation of three scales evaluating stigma in mental health. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8, 290.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ganeshkumar, P. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(1), 9.
Gourlay, G. S. (2006). Neighbourhood stigma and social exclusion: the case of two Scottish peripheral estates. Department of Urban Studies, Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow. Doctoral dissertation.
Gourlay, G. (2007, September). It’s got a bad name and it sticks…’Approaching stigma as a distinct focus of neighbourhood regeneration initiatives. In EURA Conference,‘The Vital City (pp. 12–14).
Graham, L. F., Padilla, M. B., Lopez, W. D., Stern, A. M., Peterson, J., & Keene, D. E. (2016). Spatial stigma and health in postindustrial Detroit. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 36(2), 105–113.
Griffin, E. (2012). A First Look at Communication Theory McGraw-Hill. New York, NY.
Hancock, L., & Mooney, G. (2013). “Welfare ghettos” and the “broken society”: Territorial stigmatization in the contemporary UK. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(1), 46–64.
Hastings, A. (2004). Stigma and social housing estates: Beyond pathological explanations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 233–254.
Hastings, A., & Dean, J. (2003). Challenging images: Tackling stigma through estate regeneration. Policy and Politics, 31(2), 171–184.
Hatzenbuehler, M., & Link, B. (2014). Introduction: Structural stigma and health. Social Science and Medicine, 103, 1–6.
Horgan, M. (2020). Housing stigmatization: A general theory. Social Inclusion, 8(1), 8–19.
Hughen, W. K., & Read, D. C. (2014). Inclusionary housing policies, stigma effects and strategic production decisions. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 48(4), 589–610.
Hulse, K., Jacobs, K., Arthurson, K., & Spinney, A. (2011). At home and in place? The role of housing in social inclusion. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
Jacobs, K., & Flanagan, K. (2013). Public housing and the politics of stigma. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 48(3), 319–337.
Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Rev., 42(3), 369–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406294043
Junnilainen, L. (2020). Place narratives and the experience of class: Comparing collective destigmatization strategies in two social housing neighborhoods. Social Inclusion, 8(1), 44–54.
Katz, I. T., Ryu, A. E., Onuegbu, A. G., Psaros, C., Weiser, S. D., Bangsberg, D. R., & Tsai, A. C. (2013). Impact of HIV-related stigma on treatment adherence: Systematic review and meta-synthesis. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 16, 18640.
Kearns, A., Kearns, O., & Lawson, L. (2013). Notorious places: Image, reputation, stigma. The role of newspapers in area reputations for social housing estates. Housing Studies, 28(4), 579–598.
Keene, D. E., & Padilla, M. B. (2018). Neighborhoods, Spatial Stigma, and Health. Neighborhoods and Health, 279.
Keene, D. E., & Padilla, M. B. (2010). Race, class and the stigma of place: Moving to “opportunity” in Eastern Iowa. Health and Place, 16(6), 1216–1223.
Keene, D. E., & Padilla, M. B. (2014). Spatial stigma and health inequality. Critical Public Health, 24(4), 392–404.
Kelaher, M., Warr, D. J., Feldman, P., & Tacticos, T. (2010). Living in ‘Birdsville’: Exploring the impact of neighbourhood stigma on health. Health & place, 16(2), 381–388.
Kirkness, P. (2013). Territorial stigmatisation of French housing estates: from internalisation to coping with stigma. Geography and the Lived Environment, University of Edinburgh. PhD. Thesis.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33 (TR/SE-0401), 28.
Koschinsky, J. (2009). Spatial heterogeneity in spillover effects of assisted and unassisted rental housing. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(3), 319–347.
Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2014). Stigma and social inequality. In Handbook of the social psychology of inequality (pp. 49–64). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385.
Link, B. G., Yang, L. H., Phelan, J. C., & Collins, P. Y. (2004). Measuring mental illness stigma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 511–541.
Lucas, P. J., Baird, J., Arai, L., Law, C., & Roberts, H. M. (2007). Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 4.
Madden, D. J. (2018). Pushed off the map: Toponymy and the politics of place in New York City. Urban Studies, 55(8), 1599–1614.
Maschaykh, U. (2015). The changing image of affordable housing: Design, gentrification and community in Canada and Europe. Ashgate Publishing.
McCormick, N. J., Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. J. (2012). The new stigma of relocated public housing residents: Challenges to social identity in mixed-income developments. City and Community, 11(3), 285–308.
McLeod, J. D., Uemura, R., & Rohrman, S. (2012). Adolescent mental health, behavior problems, and academic achievement. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 482–497.
Morris, A. (2012). Social housing and social problems. University of New South Wales.
Motley, C. M., & Perry, V. G. (2013). Living on the other side of the tracks: An investigation of public housing stereotypes. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32(1_suppl), 48–58.
Mu, S. (2016). Community building in social-mix public housing: participatory planning of Ankang redevelopment plan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 755–762.
Nelson, S. K. (2014). A social construction of affordable housing and nimby in a Southern California County. Electronic Theses, Projects, and Dissertations. Paper 92.
Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does affordable housing detrimentally affect property values? A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(1), 15–26.
Nguyen, M. T., Basolo, V., & Tiwari, A. (2013). Opposition to affordable housing in the USA: Debate framing and the responses of local actors. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(2), 107–130.
Nguyen, M. T., & Payton Scally, C. (2019). Affordable housing and its residents are not pollutants. Housing Policy Debate, 29(2), 363–368.
Norris, M., Byrne, M., & Carnegie, A. (2019). Combatting stigmatisation of social housing neighbourhoods in Dublin. Ireland. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(2), 254–266.
O’brien, K. M. (2016). Design morphology in public housing the intersection of design and poicy. (Master of Architecture), The Pennsylvania State University.
Palmer, C., Ziersch, A., Arthurson, K., & Baum, F. (2004). Challenging the stigma of public housing: Preliminary findings from a qualitative study in South Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 22(4), 411–426.
Palmer, C., Ziersch, A., Arthurson, K., & Baum, F. (2005). “Danger lurks around every corner”: Fear of crime and its impact on opportunities for social interaction in stigmatised Australian suburbs. Urban Policy and Research, 23(4), 393–411.
Papadopoulos, C., Lodder, A., Constantinou, G., & Randhawa, G. (2019). Systematic review of the relationship between autism stigma and informal caregiver mental health. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(4), 1665–1685.
Pendall, R. (1999). Opposition to housing: Nimby and beyond. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 112–136.
Pereira, V. B., & Queirós, J. (2014). “It’s Not a Bairro, is It?”: Subsistence sociability and focused avoidance in a public housing estate. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1297–1316.
Permentier, M., Bolt, G., & Van Ham, M. (2011). Determinants of neighbourhood satisfaction and perception of neighbourhood reputation. Urban Studies, 48(5), 977–996.
Permentier, M., van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2007). Behavioural responses to neighbourhood reputations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(2), 199–213.
Permentier, M., van Ham, M., & Bolt, G. (2008). Same neighbourhood… different views? A confrontation of internal and external neighbourhood reputations. Housing Studies, 23(6), 833–855.
Pescosolido, B. A., Manago, B., & Monahan, J. (2019). Evolving public views on the likelihood of violence from people with mental illness: Stigma and its consequences. Health Affairs, 38(10), 1735–1743.
Pescosolido, B. A., & Martin, J. K. (2015). The stigma complex. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 87–116.
Piat, M. (2000). The NIMBY phenomenon: Community residents’ concerns about housing for deinstitutionalized people. Health and Social Work, 25(2), 127–138.
Pinkster, F. M., Ferier, M. S., & Hoekstra, M. S. (2020). On the stickiness of territorial stigma: Diverging experiences in Amsterdam’s most notorious neighbourhood. Antipode, 52(2), 522–541.
Price, C. R. (2017). Alleviating Affordable Housing Stigma by Design. Graduate Program in City and Regional Planning, The Ohio State University. Ph. D Dissertation.
Public Health Resource Unit (2006). Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP): qualitative research (www.pillole.org/public/aspnuke/downloads/documenti/strumentiappraisal.pdf ).
Purdy, S. (2005). Framing regent park: The national film board of Canada and the construction of ‘outcast spaces’ in the inner city, 1953 and 1994. Media, Culture and Society, 27(4), 523–549.
Ramzanpour, M., & Nourtaghani, A. (2019). Impact of four physical design factors on mixed-income housing. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 25(1), 05018006.
Ramzanpour, M., Sharghi, A., & Saleh Sedghpour, B. (2020). Identifying and prioritizing the social and physical criteria of heterogeneous neighborhood based on the perception of neighbors (Case Study: Hassan Abad-Zargandeh Neighborhood). Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism, 11(2), 153–176.
Raynor, K., Panza, L., Ordóñez, C., Adamovic, M., & Wheeler, M. A. (2020). Does social mix reduce stigma in public housing? A comparative analysis of two housing estates in Melbourne. Cities, 96, 102458.
Redd, V. A. (2010). What can be done about homelessness and society’s nimby attitude? —America needs a way to eliminate the stigma of public housing. Poverty and Public Policy, 2(1), 175–185.
Richman, L. S., Martin, J., & Guadagno, J. (2016). Stigma-based rejection and the detection of signs of acceptance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 53–60.
Rofe, M. W. (2016). The city of corpses? Contested urban identity and the stigma of crime in Adelaide, South Australia. Landscape Research, 41(8), 966–979.
Rogers, D., Darcy, M., & Arthurson, K. (2017). Researching territorial stigma with social housing tenants: Tenant-led digital media production about people and place. In Negative Neighbourhood Reputation and Place Attachment (pp. 178–193). Routledge.
Ruff, R. R., Ng, J., Jean-Louis, G., Elbel, B., Chaix, B., & Duncan, D. T. (2018). Neighborhood stigma and sleep: Findings from a pilot study of low-income housing residents in New York City. Behavioral Medicine, 44(1), 48–53.
Ruiz-Tagle, J. (2017). Territorial stigmatization in socially-mixed neighborhoods in Chicago and Santiago: A comparison of Global-North and Global-South urban renewal problems☆ (pp. 311–349). A Cross-National Perspective, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Sakizlioglu, N. B., & Uitermark, J. (2014). The symbolic politics of gentrification: The restructuring of stigmatized neighborhoods in Amsterdam and Istanbul. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1369–1385.
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Neighborhood stigma and the perception of disorder. Focus, 24(1), 7–11.
Scally, C. P. (2013). The nuances of NIMBY: Context and perceptions of affordable rental housing development. Urban Affairs Review, 49(5), 718–747.
Scally, C. P., & Koenig, R. (2012). Beyond NIMBY and poverty deconcentration: Reframing the outcomes of affordable rental housing development. Housing Policy Debate, 22(3), 435–461.
Scally, C. P., & Tighe, J. R. (2015). Democracy in action: NIMBY as impediment to equitable affordable housing siting. Housing Studies, 30(5), 749–769.
Schultz Larsen, T., & Nagel Delica, K. (2019). The production of territorial stigmatisation: A conceptual cartography. City, 23(4-5), 540–563.
Seeman, N., Tang, S., Brown, A. D., & Ing, A. (2016). World survey of mental illness stigma. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190, 115–121.
Sharghi, A., Nourtaghani, A., Ramzanpour, M., & Gorji, R. B. (2022). Low-income housing location based on affordable criteria Using AHP Model and GIS Technique (Case Study: Babolsar City). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(8), 10337–10377.
Sharghi, A., Zarghami, E., & Ramzanpour, M. (2021). The effect of house facade signs on the stigma of residents socio-economic status (Case Study: Tehran municipal district 4). Hoviatshahr, 15(1), 81–96.
Sibley, D. (1995). Geographies of exclusion: Society and difference in the West. Psychology Press.
Silva, D., Ferreira, L., Melo, L., Silva, C., & Oliveira, A. (2018). Systematic literature review: Customer’s requirements for social housing design. In Proceedings of International Conference for Sustainable Design of the Built Environment-SDBE London (pp. 355–365).
Slater, T. (2013). Expulsions from public housing: The hidden context of concentrated affluence. Cities, 35, 384–390.
Slater, T., & Hannigan, J. (2017). Territorial stigmatization: Symbolic defamation and the contemporary metropolis (pp. 111–125). Sage.
Smets, P., & Kusenbach, M. (2020). New Research on Housing and Territorial Stigma: Introduction to the Thematic Issue. Social Inclusion, 8(1), 1–7.
Stepanova, E. V., & Strube, M. J. (2012). The role of skin color and facial physiognomy in racial categorization: Moderation by implicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 867–878.
Stevenson, C., McNamara, N., & Muldoon, O. (2014). Stigmatised identity and service usage in disadvantaged communities: Residents’, community workers’ and service providers’ perspectives. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 24(6), 453–466.
Tajti, T. (2018). Bankruptcy stigma and the second chance policy: The impact of bankruptcy stigma on business restructurings in China, Europe and the United States. China-EU Law Journal, 6(1–2), 1–31.
Talen, E. (2018). The relentless link between neighbourhoods and segregation: what are the alternatives?. Town Planning Review, 89(5), 443–463.
Tersteeg, A. K., & Pinkster, F. M. (2016). “Us up here and them down there” how design, management, and neighborhood facilities shape social distance in a mixed-tenure housing development. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5), 751–779.
Tighe, J. R. (2010). Public opinion and affordable housing: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 25(1): 3–17.
Tyler, I., & Slater, T. (2018). Rethinking the sociology of stigma. The Sociological Review, 66(4), 721–743
Van Brakel, W. H. (2006). Measuring health-related stigma—a literature review. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 11(3), 307–334.
Van Gent, W. P., Boterman, W. R., & van Grondelle, M. W. (2016). Surveying the fault lines in social tectonics; Neighbourhood boundaries in a socially-mixed renewal area. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(3), 247–267.
Van Ingen, C., Sharpe, E., & Lashua, B. (2018). Neighborhood stigma and the sporting lives of young people in public housing. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(2), 197–212.
Vassenden, A., & Lie, T. (2013). Telling others how you live—refining Goffman’s stigma theory through an analysis of housing strugglers in a homeowner nation. Symbolic Interaction, 36(1), 78–98.
Vázquez, J. J., Suarez, A., & Berríos, A. (2018). “Stigma, extreme poverty and residential situation: Residential segregation, household conditions and social relationship satisfaction among trash pickers in León, Nicaragua.” International Social Work: 0020872818788122.
Verdouw, J., & Flanagan, K. (2019). ‘I call it the dark side’: Stigma, social capital and social networks in a disadvantaged neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 56(16), 3375–3393.
Wacquant, L., Wacquant, L., & Howe, J. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced marginality: Polity.
Wacquant, L. (2015). Class, ethnicity, and state in the making of marginality: Revisiting territories of urban relegation. A. Roy, & ES Crane, Territories of poverty, 247.
Wacquant, L. (1993). Urban outcasts: Stigma and division in the black American ghetto and the French urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17, 366–383.
Wacquant, L. (2008). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. In Symbolic power in cultural contexts (pp. 43–52). Brill Sense.
Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethnicity and penality in the neo-liberal city: An analytic cartography. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1687–1711.
Warr, D. (2005a). There goes the neighbourhood: The malign effects of stigma. Social City, 19(3), 1–11.
Warr, D. (2005b). Social networks in a ‘discredited’ neighbourhood. Journal of Sociology, 41(3), 285–308.
Wassenberg, F. (2004a). Large social housing estates: From stigma to demolition? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 223–232.
Wassenberg, F. (2004b). Renewing stigmatised estates in the Netherlands: A framework for image renewal strategies. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), 271–292.
Wassmer, R. W., & Wahid, I. (2019). Does the likely demographics of affordable housing justify NIMBYism? Housing Policy Debate, 29(2), 343–358.
Watt, P. (2020). Territorial stigmatisation and poor housing at a London ‘Sink Estate.’ Social Inclusion, 8(1), 20–33.
Wutich, A., Ruth, A., Brewis, A., & Boone, C. (2014). Stigmatized neighborhoods, social bonding, and health. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 28(4), 556–577.
Yang, L. H., & Link, B. G. (2015). Measurement of attitudes, beliefs and behaviors of mental health and mental illness. Retrieved on November, 10, 2016.
Yang, S., Kim, H., Kim, S. N., & Ahn, K. (2018). What is achieved and lost in living in a mixed-income neighborhood? Findings from South Korea. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33(4), 807–828.
Funding
This article is based on the doctoral thesis of the first author, which is conducted by Dr. Ali Sharghi and consultant Dr. Abdolmajid Nourtaghani in Dept. of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Iran.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A
Method | Technique | Analysis | Sample/ size | Area | Future research | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualitative | In-depth (semi-structured) interview | NUD*IST | 17 participants (6 renters and 11 homeowners) | Adelaide, South Australia | Creating social mix—examining different aspects of regional stigma and evaluated interventions to respond to it | Palmer et al. (2004) |
Transcripts were collated by drawing together thematic issues in order to identify patterns, similarities and differences | 40 residents (16 homeowners or buyers, 14 social housing tenants, 10 renting in the private sector) | Mitchell Park, Hillcrest and Northfield, Adelaide, South Australia | Past policies challenge to integrate about local peoples, and we need to know their culture and perspectives. And whether we are affected by class segregation in the mix of housing and neighborhood reconstruction? | Arthurson (2010a) | ||
– | 27 people who are excluded from access to Homeownership (Refugee Families, Drug Dependency and/or Mental Health Problems, D´eclass´e) | Oslo and Stavanger, Norway | "Multiple stigma" not clearly seen by Goffman should be considered a key consideration in stigma studies—comparative studies of different stigma groups or different stigmas | Vassenden and Lie (2013) | ||
Transcribed and coded with the use of NVivo | 50 residents | Jane-Finch neighborhood of Toronto, Canada | An in-depth study of the relationship between racial, cultural and religious diversity and social cohesion- More attention to how diversity affects social cohesion, social capital and security in neighborhoods | Ahmadi (2018) | ||
Community mapping, and go-along interviews | Using a new analytic framework called “ecometrics”(Ecometrics moves beyond individual-centred questions and surveys, or “methodological individualism”). We engaged in thematic and theoretical analysis to identify patterns of meanings across these datasets | 14 young people between the ages of 13 and 22 years old | Redcrest, Niagara, Canada | – | Ingen et al. 2018 | |
In-depth interview, Statistics Census | NUD*IST | 17 participants (renters and homeowners) | Adelaide, South Australia | Policies that make residents feel more secure and confident, and integration—examining the social composition of the problems of margins | Palmer et al. 2005 | |
Interview, film analysis | – | Residents, activists, local politicians and planners | Regent Park, Toronto, Canada, | The physical design of the project provides only an understanding of some of problems. Social, economic and political contexts are important | Purdy (2005) | |
In-depth semi-structured interviews supplemented with reviews of local media, participant observation, | Open-coding of interview transcripts, followed by focused-coding using a set of fixed codes and the data analysis software ATLASTI | 25 African American men and women who relocate to Iowa, social-service providers | Eastern Iowa, USA | Investigating the Relationship between Health and Immigrant Experience—Considering the reasoning processes involved in the production of spatial stigma, such as poverty deconcentration in an area | Keene and Padilla (2010) | |
Semi-structured interview; Review of newspapers; | Audio files transcribed for analysis then reviewed and coded; Newspapers grouped into three general categories (physical characteristic of the housing units, neighborhood characteristics and tenant characteristics) | 37 interviews (19 affordable housing developers and 18 local government staff); 38 California newspapers (1996–2006), 146 articles | California, USA | Understand the impact of these decisions on city form, regional performance, and social equality. For example, the distance and time between work and home for low-income people- research on the impact of social deprivation on affordable housing residents and their family outputs | Nguyen et al. (2013) | |
In-depth semi-structured interviews; (participant) Observation | Coding was undertaken through multiple reviews of the interview and observation transcriptions, with categorizing and creation of summary matrices using basic word processing software | 35 relocated residents, 184 field observations from community meetings and events | Oakwood Shores, Park Boulevard, and Westhaven Park, Chicago, USA | Mixed-income housing seem to be leading to a new form of stigma and increasing the isolation of the public housing residents who have been brought there | McCormick et al. (2012) | |
– | 32 residents, 12 key informants (including TCHC staff, politicians, developers, and community workers); participant observation at community events and meetings (including updates, consultations, Tenant Council, and other meetings) | Regent Park, Toronto, Canada | Social mix cannot answer the problems of marginalization. Topics to consider: Reducing housing maintenance budgets, upgrading social security networks, opportunities for the labor market, poverty and racial inequality | August(2014) | ||
Interview: assumed three axes of differentiation; established/ newcomers, low-income/higher-income, and black/white … and classifying | 100 interviews with residents and institutional actors; 40 sessions of observations of several spaces of intergroup encounter, and 20 “spatial inventories” in which I located the traces of the symbolic presence of each group | Cabrini Green-in Chicago and La Loma-La Florida in Santiago | The social mix is very questionable and is complicated by the symbolic perception and reputation of the living environments of the poor | Ruiz-Tagle (2017) | ||
In-depth semi-structured interviews; literature review about cases | Interviews:—literature review: text analysis; and analysis of data on exchequer investment | Interviews with 6 key actors in the regeneration project design and implementation; text analysis of the case study estates’ regeneration plans and evaluations of their achievements if available; analysis of data on exchequer investment in the culture-led regeneration programs | Ballymun, Fatima Mansions, and Moyross in Dublin, Ireland | Further study on the impact of cultural revival on social cohesion and cultural capital | Carnegie and Norris (2015) | |
In-depth semi-structured interviews | coding of interview data, highlighted a number of concepts, themes and topics taken from the documentary analysis | 65 participants (39 residents, 26 lived in other neighborhoods) | Nîmes, France | Paying more attention to gender and age and differentiating between young people and other people—Surveying neighborhoods with minority ethnic groups—Doing research on a larger scale—Using visual techniques in the method | Kirkness (2013) | |
Discussions about television series | Analysis was initially conducted collaboratively by a tenant–academic team drawing on the panel | A panel including 19 Participants (residents of a number of inner-city and suburban estates; community workers who work on estates; and self-nominated viewers of the show) | Sydney and Adelaide, Australia | – | Arthurson et al. 2014 | |
Collaborative research; residents voice through social media: Digital storytelling project, “housos” series project, “lost in the woods” film project | – | Collaborative between researchers and tenants | Australia | Residents should be involved in the research process, in policy discussions and in response to stigma | Rogers et al. 2017 | |
Ethnographic and case study approach; In-depth interview and open-ended questionnaire; | Transcripts of data, word processing software | 45 Residents, 25 Non-residents or former resident, 29 Non-resident professional or institutional | Easthill and Westhill estates, Dundee, Scotland | Investigation of stigma over time and after regeneration and change | Gourlay (2006) | |
Wider social influences such as the media and popular discourses on poverty and deprivation | Gourlay (2007) | |||||
Ethnographic and case study approach; participant observation unstructured Interview, Structured interview, Community Meeting | discourse analysis for interview data | Structured interview with 36 residents; Community Meeting with public officials and residents | New England college town, USA | – | Blokland (2008) | |
Ethnographic and case study approach; In-depth interview, observation, analyze newspaper | Interview: transcribed and coded | Interview: 60 residents. Census and archival records and analyzed 560 newspaper articles from the 1960s | Helsinki and Turku, Finland | Social housing stigma should be understood as a form of "non-recognition." And the collective nature of stigma strategies has so far been underestimated | Junnilainen (2020) | |
Ethnographic and case study approach | – | Public Library, and other collections that include materials on neighborhood history (2007–2010) | Brooklyn, New York | – | Madden (2018) | |
Descriptive-analytical/ Review | Exploring the debates that emerged about housing and inequality | – | New South Wales, Australia | Accurate definition of issues related to Australian social exclusion and housing policies | Arthurson (2004) | |
Image of large housing estates | – | Netherlands | – | Wassenberg (2004) | ||
– | – | Flanders, Belgium | – | Decker and Pannecoucke (2004) | ||
– | 17 research | USA | Investigating housing trends before and after the construction of affordable housing—Comparing the same housing policies in different cities- Investigating the impact of ethnic/ racial factors in relation to this type of housing and property value—Using qualitative methods In this regard—study the effects of different types of affordable housing | Nguyen (2005) | ||
Lawrence Vale viewpoint | – | USA | – | Redd (2010) | ||
Outcomes of NIMBY research | 35 research | USA | Government agencies should be involved in data collection and evaluation of outputs so that decisions are based on experience and extend beyond NIMBY | Scally and Koenig (2012) | ||
Utilizing Loïc Wacquant’s recent work on “territorial stigmatization” and his thesis on the “ghetto” | – | UK | Punishment and control of crime must be done to grow a weak society and ghetto concepts in the context of social and economic inequality | Hancock and Mooney (2013) | ||
Problem of stigmatization and reduce public housing stigma | Base on the findings of a research panel investigation (three academics, a journalist, two practitioners from the housing sector and a doctoral student) | Australia | – | Jacobs and Flanagan (2013) | ||
Offer some critical reflections on the central analytical and political/ policy issues emerging the special issue of Cities focused on the Right To The City Alliance’s report We Call These Projects Home (WCTPH) | – | UK | Developments in subsidized housing are associated with high levels of crime, antisocial behavior, and declining social capital. They must be addressed. Policies need to be aimed at dispersing the rich | Slater (2013) | ||
Territorial stigma | – | Edinburgh, Scotland | Focus on ambiguities in dominance / resistance—Understand how gentrification theory can be used to spatial stigma | Slater and Hannigan (2017) | ||
Social responses to, and coping strategies | This thematic issue originated in a session titled “Housing Stigma” co-organized by the editors of this volume for the 19th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, July 2018; based on 7 articles | Toronto, Canada | Most recent research on territorial stigma has made no distinction between stigmas attributed to neighborhoods, types of housing, and occupations that should be considered- a more detailed study of this stigma in different places | Smets and Kusenbach (2020) | ||
Housing stigmatization | Literature | The need to build experimental tools to measure residential stigma- neglect of the elements affecting residential stigma in non-Western contexts- Given the underlying diversity in residential stigma, its reduction requires strategies appropriate to that particular context | Horgan (2020) | |||
Content analysis (a tripartite approach to media analysis, incorporating content, production and reception), semi-structured interviews | Theory driven coding. we triangulate the findings of our content analysis with those generated from research with residents and media professionals | 4 newspapers analysis; interview: 1. with Two focus groups Each involved six participants (2 non-resident community activist, 10 residents) 2. 5 media professionals | Moyross, Limerick City, Ireland | Future research in Ireland should consider the perception of neighborhoods by non-residents and the factors that mediate between them and media messages | Devereux et al. 2011 | |
Content analysis | Articles were categorized according to the image they onveyed. random sample of the articles were then categorized by a second researcher to ensure validity. Distinguishing between direct and indirect articles | 7 newspapers over the period January 1998 to August 2011; online media databases were used to identify articles | Sighthill and Red Road, Glasgow, USA | The relationship between reputation and the health and well-being of residents—A study of the social, psychological and psychosocial effects of reputation- Research on journalists to what extent they are aware of the impact of their approach on disadvantaged areas | Kearns et al. 2013 | |
Case-study (In-depth semi-structured) Interview | – | Households, outsiders, local employers, journalists and regeneration agencies | UK | Conduct other in-depth research in this field | Hastings (2004) | |
Data analyzed content coded to reflect various dimensions of NIMBY attitudes and actions | Six case studies; interviews with more than 25 public officials and developers and/or managers of affordable rental housing | New York, USA | How this attitude can change and diminish over time- the need for generalizable research that can go beyond states- trying to change public opinion and unravel the nuances of this attitude | Scally (2013) | ||
– | Amsterdam: 63 interviews (39 regular tenants, 1 representative of the housing corporation, 22 temporary residents, and 1 with a squatter); Istanbul: 48 interviews) 9 formal tenants, 9 informal tenants, 21 property owners, 3 squatters, 2 representatives of the municipality, and 1 a representative of GAP (The government worked with a private investor, GAP, to transform the renewal area) | Comparative study: Ceramplein and the Van der Pek Blocks in Amsterdam, Tarlabaş in Istanbul | Comparative study of differences and commonalities in other case studies | Sakizlioglu and Uitermark (2014) | ||
– | Interview with 16 participants (residents, community activists and social service providers) | Ballymun, Clarion Quay, and Fatima Mansions in Dublin, Ireland | Strategies that limit the potential for internal stigma to achieve a proper neighborhood mix and design public housing so that it is indistinguishable | Norris et al. 2019 | ||
Case-study, In-depth semi-structured interview with the method of narrative mapping | Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using the software Atlas.ti | 20 residents; 8 neighborhood professionals (project developers and managers, and housing officers) | IJburg, Amsterdam, Netherlands | "Blame" is not only influenced by design, but also by management and facilities at the neighborhood scale—the need for a more integrated approach to planning and managing mixed neighborhoods and more opportunities for positive interaction between groups | Tersteeg and Pinkster (2016) | |
Case-study; Semi-structured interview | – | 41 residents | Bijlmer, Amsterdam, Netherlands | The distinction between the production of stigma by outsiders and residents is very clear. It is suggested that unequal power relations, which are at the core of the territorial stigma process, be clarified, both outside and inside the neighborhood | Pinkster et al. 2020 | |
Review, Case-study | – | – | Bijlmermeer, Amsterdam, Netherlands | Changing the stigma of a large residential complex is a long process. Due to this limitation, working on image enhancement is useful in the reconstruction process | Wassenberg (2004a) | |
Participatory research and planning methods; participatory observation, in-depth interview, focus group workshops | – | Observe the community’s daily life; interview with households, experts and social welfare groups who working on community affairs; four workshops for youth renters, Ankang households, property management professionals and city government sectors | AnKang welfare Housing, Taipei | Management mechanisms must be more inclusive and comprehensive with the principles of social integration life | Mu (2016) | |
Collective environment fit, peer-research, and Participatory observation | The observations were then discussed in decision-making sessions | 9 residents | Montreal, Canada | Improving the living environment and wel-being of these communities | Coulombe et al. (2018) | |
Quantitative | AITS (“Adjusted interrupted time series”)–DID (“Difference-in-difference”) model (this model is a hedonic price model) | Regression analysis | Subsidized and unsubsidized apartments | Seattle, Washington, USA | Further research in this area by examining the impact of low-income apartments or rental single-family homes | Koschinsky (2009) |
Survey; Questionnaire | Factor analysis, Regression model, | 571 residents | Afrikaanderwijk, Westpunt and Schiemond, Rotterdam, Netherlands | The importance of time and familiarity and its effect on the severity of stigma—in this case, people feel belonging to their neighborhood | Duin et al., 2011 | |
Participants were given a hypothetical scenario; Regression analysis, Logistic Regression analysis | 144 participants (university students) | USA | Investigating the Relationship Between Tendency to Diversity and Demographic Characteristics—Examining Other Types of Low-Income Housing in This Field- Investigating stereotyped beliefs related to emergency shelters- Investigating this research in other geographical contexts and with other examples- Investigating the impact of attitudes and stereotypes on residents | Motley and Perry (2013) | ||
Descriptive statistics for sociodemographic variables; for Sleep duration using linear regression and sleep quality using GLM; Regression models; using Stata software | 120 residents | New York, USA | Examining Neighborhood Stigma and Sleep Disorders, as well as Objective Measurements of Sleep Duration- The main effects and effects correction hypotheses could be examined in more detail in a larger article | Ruff et al. 2018 | ||
Hedonic pricing method | Regression analysis | Social housing developments | Walmer neighborhood, South Africa | Examining the impact of this housing on more than one neighborhood and how far its impact extends—Examining the impact of another type of housing (such as informal settlements) | Du Preez and Sale (2013) | |
Affordable housing developments | Sacramento County, California, USA | Consider cap and trade to build more affordable housing. The possible result is that more affluent communities will shift their share of this type of housing to less affluent communities | Wassmer and Wahid (2019) | |||
Model | Mathematical procedure | Inclusionary housing | New York, USA | These findings can help make real choices by examining the relationship between property development decisions and inclusionary housing policies in different economic environments | Hughen and Read (2014) | |
Mixed-method | Longitudinal resident survey; questionnaire, In-depth semi-structured interviews | Quantitative data: linear regression models; Qualitative data: deductive/inductive approach used for coding | Question from 304 residents; interview with 30 women who were relocated | Maverick Gardens HOPE VI program in Boston, Massachusetts, USA | Assess the role of a neighborhood's various resources and determine whether some institutions or public spaces provide more useful meeting places, enhance familiarity and trust, or better access to opportunity—to what extent different features of public space design, neighborhood structure, and facilities increase or reduce the accidental contact of residents with non-residents | Curley (2010) |
Survey; In-depth interviews, questionnaire | Quantitative data: Chi-square test; Qualitative data: recorded and transcribed, in order to identify patterns, similarities and differences | Interview with 40 residents (16 homeowners or buyers, 14 social housing tenants, 10 renting in the private sector), Question from 325 residents | Mitchell Park, Hillcrest and Northfield, Adelaide, South Australia | Studies show that in mixed neighborhoods, stigma is usually present by owners who associate social housing tenants with social problems and crime | Arthurson (2010) | |
Reconstruction policies should focus on making neighborhoods attractive to outsiders | Arthurson (2012) | |||||
The importance of social cohesion and collective effectiveness in mixed neighborhoods | Arthurson (2013) | |||||
Social network analysis (SNA); Survey | SNA: UCINET 6 and visualizing in Netdraw. Interview: NVivo 10 | Interview: 25 households from each of the four recruitment areas. Questionnaire: 628 residents | Tasmania, Australia | There is a need to identify criteria for building relationships between small domains that are at risk of internal stigma | Verdouw and Flanagan 2019 | |
Survey; in-depth interview, ethnographic account of day-to-day interactions | Though, Hirschman’s ‘exit-voice’ model is more a descriptive tool than an analytic lens: we use it to frame the myriad of actually existing ways of dealing with territorial stigma | Survey of about 120 local families, 15 interviews of residents | Bairro do Viso, Porto, Portugal | – | Pereira and Queirós (2014) | |
Survey; questionnaire, analyze LIHTC housing | Questionnaire: descriptive statistics only; LIHTC analyze: correlation between affordable housing location and … | Online question from 74 affordable housing developers; analyze all of the LIHTC housing that has been developed between 2006 and 2011 | New York, USA | Providing appropriate information to people and informal meetings with them and building trust will lead to better outcomes in this area | Scally and Tighe (2015) | |
Online survey; photo questionnaire, open-ended questionnaire | Qualitative: content analysis and coding. Quantitative: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA); logistic regression; ANOVA; variance and a Kruskal–Wallis H Test; post hoc analysis | 718 homeowners | Ohio, USA | Relationship between behavior and built environment- Using Eye tracking tools to detect low-income housing | Price (2017) | |
Online survey; questionnaire, map question | Cronbach's alpha; Descriptive statistics; regression analyses | Questionnaire placed approximately in an 800 m radius from each of the stigmatized estates | Kensington Estate and the mono-tenure Flemington Estate in Melbourne, Australia | Examining the difference between "social desirability bias" during interviews and questionnaires—is the lack of social housing related to its acceptance? | Raynor et al. (2020) | |
Case-study (empirical findings from Local Government Area of Parramatta); surveys, interviews | Opposition to planned affordable housing developments in the study period were coded, with key extracts recorded verbatim | 47 affordable housing projects, data from: 397 written submissions, 155 doorstep surveys (60 homes around each of the nine projects were visited and 14–20 surveys were completed for each), interviews (with government and the non-profit sector, planning officers, …) and newspaper articles (2009–2011) | Parramatta, Sydney, Australia | More research is needed in these areas before the housing planning process | Davison et al. 2016 | |
Case-study; Participant observation, Community meetings, In-depth interviews, newspaper analysis | Repetitive newspaper phrases. - | Interview: 5 long-term residents–2 secure council tenants and 3 leaseholders, 2 charity workers, shorter interviews in 2015 with 3 council tenants and 3 temporary tenants. Newspaper: web-based sources (local and national press) and 2 local newspapers. 18 community meetings (12 tenants and leaseholders) | Aylesbury estate in south London | – | Watt (2020) |
Appendix B
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramzanpour, M., Sharghi, A. & Nourtaghani, A. Low-income housing stigma, results and outcomes: a systematic review. J Hous and the Built Environ 38, 861–930 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09967-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-022-09967-9