Skip to main content

Triple understanding of Guanzhong Narrow Courtyard and its house space

Abstract

Architecture itself is a witness to social and cultural development, so the study on it should not only focus on the material symbols but also pay more attention to the multiple roles played by its material space in a specific social–cultural construction from multiple perspectives, residential buildings are no exception. Based on the dialectical analysis of Levi Strauss’s house society concept and Lefebvre’s spatial ternary theory, this paper attempts to sort out the triple theory of the house space; taking Chinese well-preserved Guanzhong Narrow Courtyard in the Ming and Qing Dynasties (1368–1912) as an example, it starts from the three aspects of housing space which are material presentation, reconstruction and innovation, and potential circulating capital in the social production and reproduction to explore a qualitative research of the house space, and tries to reappear the metaphorical relationship between housing space of Chinese Guanzhong Narrow Courtyard and social–cultural construction in a historical period of social and cultural development, and explain its profound connotation; from the perspective of sociology, it provides inspiration and lays a foundation for the research on the design of the house space in the transition from the traditional society to the modern society in the specific area.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Notes

  1. Room is a special term for Chinese architecture, which is a unit used to express the width of a building's plane. The size of a room is 3 meters or so.

  2. Adobe house is the house that uses mud for a wall, the inside and outside of the wall material is mud.

  3. Sha room is a term named by people in the Guanzhong area. It is usually used for son and daughter's living, which has a single-sloped roof facing the yard.

  4. Zhuge Liang (181–234), courtesy name Kongming, was a politician, military strategist, writer, engineer and inventor in ancient China.

  5. Xunzi (third century BCE) was a Confucian philosopher, sometimes reckoned as the third of the three great classical Confucians (after Confucius and Mencius).

References

  • Bourdieu, P. (1965). The sentiment of honor in Kabyle Society. In J. G. Peristiany (Ed.), Honor and shame: The values of Mediterranean Society (pp. 191–241). London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchli, V. (2018). An anthropology of architecture (X. Pan, & G. Z. Li, Trans.). Beijing: China Building Industry Press.

  • Carsten, J. (1987). Woman, kinship and community in a Malay fishing village: On Pulau Langkawi, Kedah Malaysia. Dissertation, University of London.

  • Carsten, J., & Hugh-Jones, S. (1995). About the house: Levi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z. H. (2019). House and home: The meaning production of house and family. Modern Anthropology, 7(2), 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J. W. (2006). Family vicissitude in Guanzhong area. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 6(4), 128–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington, S. (1987). Incestuous twins and the house societies of insular southwest Asia. Cultural Anthropology, 2(4), 403–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, T. (1995). Having your house and rating it: House and siblings in Ara, South Sulawesi. In J. Carsten & S. Hugh-Jones (Eds.), About the house: Levi-Strauss and beyond (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H. Y. (2016). Inheritance and innovation on tradition of Guanzhong residential buildings. Dissertation, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology.

  • Henderson, H., & Ostler, N. (2005). Muisca settlement organization and chiefly authority at Suta, Valle de Leyva, Colombia: A critical appraisal of native concepts of house for studies of complex societies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 148–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugh-Jones, S. (1995). Inside-out and back-to-front: The androgynous house in Northwest Amazonia. In J. Carsten & S. Hugh-Jones (Eds.), About the house: Levi-Strauss and beyond (pp. 226–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (English version). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1965). The future of kinship studies. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1965, 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1982). The way of the masks (S. Modelski, Trans.). Seattle: University of Washington Press.

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1987). Anthropology and myth: Lectures 1951–1982, First Printing edition. Basil: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (2017). House and the social structure of Jiarong Tibetan. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C. L. (2018). Discussion on the embodiment of shaanxi merchant culture in the architecture of Guanzhong Folk houses. Appreciation, 36, 232–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. L., & Li, X. F. (2003). Sociology view of vernacular architecture research. Huazhong Architecture, 21(4), 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. J. (2015). Report on the development of Shaanxi entrepreneurs. Xi’an: Shanxi RenminPublishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2003). Sociology and anthropology (B. P. She, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.

  • Mckinnon, S. (1995). House and hierarchy: The view from a South Moluccan Society. In J. Carsten & S. Hugh-Jones (Eds.), About the house: Levi-Strauss and beyond (pp. 170–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. H. (2003). Houses and house-life of the American Aborigines (P. Z. Zhu, Trans.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

  • Sun, S. Z. (2011). Morphological analysis of courtyard space in Guanzhong region. Dissertation, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology.

  • Wiseman, B. (2009). The Cambridge companion to Levis-Strauss. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C. P., & Li, B. (2017). Businessmen group born by pressure and opportunity—On the rise of Shaanxi Businessmen in Ming and Qing Dynasties. West Journal, 4, 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. (2007). ‘Bailu Plain’ and the folk culture. Dissertation, Shaanxi Normal University.

  • Zhang, B. T., & Liu, Z. Y. (2017). Shaanxi folk house. Beijing: China Building Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiao Ning.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Ning, Q. Triple understanding of Guanzhong Narrow Courtyard and its house space. J Hous and the Built Environ 36, 521–537 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09764-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09764-2

Keywords

  • House space
  • Guanzhong Narrow Courtyard
  • Triple understanding
  • Social–cultural construction
  • Circulating capital