Abstract
In recent years, with the effect of globalization, many domestic and foreign investments have been made in the construction sector in Istanbul. Along with the advantages of these activities, there are also some disadvantages; such as uncontrolled urban growth and certain changes in the urban areas. One such example is the Levent area which contains the most important business center of Istanbul. Today, we can assume the Levent area to be divided into three regions. In the 1950s, after the construction of houses and establishment of industrial facilities in the north side of Istanbul, these three regions were developed as residential, industrial and slum areas. The industrial region became a central business district and its environment was developed independently in the form of market areas. As a result, the functions of the houses of Levent’s residential area were changed as these become the buildings that were used for business activities or which served the subsidiary sectors. These three areas, adjacent to one other, are still undergoing very rapid changes in all physical, cultural and functional senses. Therefore, the urban regeneration of these districts has been investigated in detail along with their historical developments and space syntax methodology has been applied to quantify the spatial configurations in the region. The changes in physical, cultural and functional characteristics in the region have been observed to affect the relationship between the spaces in the urban system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbulut, (2012). Kemal Ahmet Aru ve misyon kusagi. Tasarim + Kuram,8(14), 8–21.
Altinok, E. (2006). Yasadisi yapilasan alanlarda donusturme kapasitelerinin tukenisi ve kentsel yoksulluk: Celiktepe ornegi. Master’s thesis, Yildiz Techical University, Istanbul.
Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., & Istek, C. (2001). Characterization of the street networks in the traditional Turkish urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,28, 777–795.
Baba, E. C. (2010). Tasarim surecinde katilimci yaklasimlara dair bir degerlendirme: Istanbul Levent bolgesinde alan calismasi. Tasarim + Kuram,6(9-10), 21–53.
Barros, A. B. G., Kneib, E. C., Paiva, M., & Tedesco, G. M. I. (2014). Analysis of trip generating developments by space syntax: A case study of Brasília, Brazil. Journal of Transport Literature,8(3), 7–36.
Baser, B., & Kubat, A. S. (2007). A new landscape design strategy for creating continuous, perceptible and productive urban green: A case study of Kadikoy-Istanbul. Paper presented at the 6th international space syntax symposium, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, June.
Baydar, O. (1994). Levent. In Dunden bugune Istanbul ansiklopedisi (Vol. 5, pp. 207–209). Istanbul: Kultur Bakanligi ve Tarih Vakfi Yayinlari.
Cakmak, B. Y., & Topcu, M. (2018). An evaluation of urban open spaces in historical city center of Konya in the context of pedestrian mobility. International Journal of Human Sciences,15(4), 1827–1846.
Can, I., & Heath, T. (2016). In-between spaces and social interaction: a morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,31(1), 31–49.
Can, I., Ince, I., & Yamu, C. (2015). The rationale behind growth patterns: Socio-spatial configuration of Izmir, Turkey 1700 s–2010. Paper presented at the 10th international space syntax symposium, University College London, London, UK, July.
Cil, E. (2005). Space syntax analysis of the twentieth century transformation of Kula. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University,23, 283–293.
Ciravoglu, A. (2015). The impact of urban pattern on claiming ‘place’: Case studies from Istanbul. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development,7(1), 1–14.
Erbas, A. E. (2012). Ornek bir prestij konut alani olarak Levent Mahallesi. Tasarim + Kuram,8(14), 5–7.
Ercoskun, C., & Yalciner, O. (2004). Istanbul kent merkezinin donusumu ve finans merkezlerindeki ofis alanlarının gelisimi: Maslak-Buyukdere aksi. Paper presented at the 8 Kasim Dunya Sehircilik Gunu 28. Kolokyumu, Ankara, Turkey, November.
Eyuboglu, E., Kubat, A. S., & Ertekin, O. (2007). A new urban planning approach for the regeneration of an historical area within Istanbul’s central business district. Journal of Urban Design,12(2), 295–312.
Gulen, M. (2006). Stratejik planlama yaklasimi cercevesinde kentsel projeler-kamusal alan iliskisi: Buyukdere Aksi Levent plazalar alanı ornegi. Master’s thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul.
Guney, Y. I., Kubat, A. S., Ozer, O., & Ucar, H. (2009). A syntactic analysis of recent changes in the CBD of Balikesir, Turkey. Paper presented at the 7th international space syntax symposium, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, June.
Hanson, J., & Hillier, B. (1987). The architecture of community: Some new proposals on the social consequences of architectural and planning decisions. Architecture et Comportement/Architecture and Behaviour,3(3), 251–273.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Hillier, B. (1989). The architecture of the urban object. Ekistics,56, 5–21.
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1987). Creating life: Or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture et Comportement/Architecture & Behaviour,3(3), 233–250.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B,20(1), 29–66.
Jeong, S. K., Lee, T. H., & Ban, Y. U. (2015). Characteristics of spatial configurations in Pyongyang, North Korea. Habitat International,47, 148–157.
Kahraman, E. D., & Kubat, A. S. (2015). In the effects of accessibility factors on land values in the CBD of Izmir. Paper presented at the 10th international space syntax symposium. University College London, London, UK, July.
Karabey, H. (2009). Kullan tuket terket: Levent. Mimarlik,349, 31–36.
Karimi, K. (2012). A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. Urban Design International,17(4), 297–318.
Klarqvist, B. (1993). A space syntax glossary. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research,2, 11–12.
Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (2006). Urban social geography: An introduction. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
Koohsari, M. J., Kaczynski, A. T., Mccormack, G. R., & Sugiyama, T. (2014). Using space syntax to assess the built environment for physical activity: Applications to research on parks and public open spaces. Leisure Sciences,36(2), 206–216.
Kubat, A. S. (2010). The study of urban form in Turkey. Urban Morphology,14(1), 31–48.
Lungo, M., & Baires, S. (2001). Socio-spatial segregation and urban land regulation in Latin American cities. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Segregation in the City, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, July.
Oktem, B. (2005). Kuresel kent soyleminin kentsel mekani donuşturmedeki rolu: Buyukdere-Maslak hatti. In H. Kurtulus (Ed.), Istanbul’da kentsel ayrisma: Mekansal donusumde farkli boyutlar. Istanbul: Baglam Yayınlari.
Oktem, B. (2011). The role of global city discourses in the development and transformation of the Buyukdere–Maslak axis into the international business district of Istanbul. International Planning Studies,16(1), 27–42.
Onder, D. E., & Gigi, Y. (2010). Reading urban spaces by the space-syntax method: A proposal for the South Halic Region. Cities,27, 260–271.
Ozbaki, C., & Onder, D. E. (2009). The spatial alteration of Istanbul: Celiktepe District. Paper presented at the 7th international space syntax symposium, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, June.
Ozbil, A., Peponis, J., & Stone, B. (2011). Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design International,16(2), 125–141.
Ozer, O. (2017). Accessibility of spatial networks: Using ArcGIS network analyst and space syntax to investigate accessibility to urban facilities. Paper presented at the 11th international space syntax symposium, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, July.
Ozer, O., Koramaz, T. K., & Kisar-Koramaz, E. (2015). The effects of spatial relations in property-led regeneration. Paper presented at the 10th international space syntax symposium, University College London, London, UK, July.
Ozer, O., & Kubat, A. S. (2015). Measuring walkability in Istanbul Galata Region. ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture,12(1), 15–29.
Penn, A., Hillier, B., Banister, D., & Xu, J. (1998). Configurational modelling of urban movement networks. Environment and Planning B,25(1), 59–84.
Peponis, J., Hadjinikolaou, E., Livieratos, C., & Fatouros, D. A. (1989). The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics,56, 43–55.
Peponis, J., Ross, C., & Rashid, M. (1997). The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta. Geoforum,28(3–4), 341–358.
Psarra, S. (2003).Top-down and bottom-up characterisations of shape and space. Paper presented at the 4th international space syntax symposium, University College London, London, UK, June.
Tasan-Kok, T. (2015). Analysing path dependence to understand divergence: Investigating hybrid neo-liberal urban transformation processes in Turkey. European Planning Studies,23(11), 2184–2209.
Topcu, M. (2009). Accessibility effect on urban land values. Scientific Research and Essay,4(11), 1286–1291.
Topcu, M., & Kubat, A. S. (2007). Morphological comparison of two historical Anatolian towns. Paper presented at the 6th international space syntax symposium, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, June.
Topcu, M., & Kubat, A. S. (2009). The analysis of urban features that affect land values: The case of Istanbul. Paper presented at the 7th international space syntax symposium, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, June.
Topcu, M., & Kubat, A. S. (2012). Old and new city: Morphological analysis of Antakya. Paper presented at the 8th international space syntax symposium, PUC, Santiago, Chile, January.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agirbas, A. Characteristics of social formations and space syntax application to quantify spatial configurations of urban regeneration in Levent, Istanbul. J Hous and the Built Environ 35, 171–189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09671-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09671-1